We are pleased to announce the release of the Issue of ELT Choutari (October-December 2025). This issue presents a collection of reflective accounts from English language teachers and practitioners, offering diverse perspectives on teaching, learning, and research.
Since it is a generic issue, it includes articles from diverse fields of English language teaching in the context of Nepal. ELT Choutari is a platform to share the English language teachers’ experiences regarding their practices and experiences. This issue is the result of the same. For this, we are grateful to all the contributors. We encourage English language teachers and practitioners to contribute in the future issues as this can share and document our reflective practices.
The following section includes the contributors with the gist of their reflections. We hope their experiences and anecdotes will benefit our esteemed readers.
Mr. Dev Ram Joshi, in his article, explores the engagement of learners in English language learning through project-based learning integrated as internal assessment in the secondary level curriculum. His technical action research reflects that his students increased the time to study English subject, developed their writing skill including handwriting and composition skills and presentation skills such as pronunciation, clarity, and confidence. Meanwhile, they started to learn English by studying other reference materials as well.
Likewise, Mr. Dammar Singh Saud in his article drawing on personal experience and educational theories, argues for reflective, context-sensitive, collaborative, and well-resourced Teacher Professional Development. He advocated that, learning from countries like Finland and Singapore, Nepal must prioritise teacher agency, mentorship, digital readiness, and long-term systemic reform.
Similarly, Mr. Khem Raj Rauteda, in his article, reflects his experience implementing translanguaging pedagogy to enhance learner engagement in a multilingual secondary classroom in Nepal. Through reflecting on his role as a facilitator and co-learner, he found that translanguaging nurtured culturally responsive pedagogy, strengthened relationships, and empowered students, providing valuable insights for inclusive English language teaching in multilingual contexts.
Similarly, Mr. Janak Sigdel, in his article, explores the ongoing challenges of implementing Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in rural community schools in Nepal. His reflection highlights key barriers, including inadequate infrastructure, lack of electricity, limited internet access, and low digital literacy among teachers. His article underscores the growing digital divide between urban and rural schools, advocating for policy interventions and capacity-building programmes to promote more equitable and sustainable ICT integration in education.
Likewise, Mr. Nar Bahadur Bist, in his article, deals with the complicated and changing nature of English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) in language planning and policy in Nepal. He discusses how English has established a dominant presence in the education system, as well as a larger presence in society, despite Nepal’s non-colonial relationship with Britain, shaping ideologies, creating inequalities, and affecting cultural identity.
Moreover, Mr.Arjun Jung Rayamajhi, in his article, discusses the integration of ChatGPT in English language teaching in Nepalese community schools with its opportunities and challenges. He argues that ChatGPT offers the possibility to experience a personalized learning process and support engagement growth in the underprivileged setting. However, it also emphasizes the significance of the human factor, critical thinking, and ethical competence.
For your convenience, here are the hyperlinks to the blog posts:
Lastly, we extend heartfelt gratitude to all our editors and reviewers — Ganesh Kumar Bastola, Jeevan Karki, Dr. Nani Babu Ghimire, Dr. Jnanu Raj Poudel, Sagar Poudel, Binod Duwadi, Puskar Chaudhary, Dr. Yadu Prasad Gnawali, and Dasharath Rai—for their dedicated efforts in bringing this issue to completion.
ELT Choutari is a platform for researchers, scholars, educators, and practitioners to share insights, practices, and narratives from classrooms and communities. We invite you to contribute to our upcoming issue by submitting your articles and reflections to 2elt.choutari@gmail.com.
English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) is the educational approach in which English is used to teach all subjects. The use of EMI involves teaching subjects from the academic curriculum, for example, Science, Maths, and History in English, where English is neither the native nor the dominant language in school, college, or university. Consequently, English becomes the medium through which a student learns, instead of being taught as a subject itself. I focus on English as a medium of teaching in language policy and planning. When I look back at the history of Nepal, the English have no colonial past. However, it has maintained a major ideological influence since the Rana dictatorship. When Rana Prime Minister Jung Bahadur Rana first visited Britain, he was drawn to the use of the English language. He brought two Englishmen, Mr. Ross and Canning, to teach English to his children. Since then, English has become widely used and popular in Nepal. It has caused societal division by reinforcing inequalities in education, opportunity, and cultural identity. At the time, Rana Prime Minister, including Jung Bahadur Rana, created a schism among his family members when he stated that he would forsake everything and teach his children English. Nepal cannot remain unaffected by the global growth of the English language. It is included as one of the languages spoken in Nepal in the Constitution of Nepal 2015. In Nepal, English is taught as both a topic and a medium of education. Since their inception, most private schools have used English as their primary medium of instruction. Community schools are primarily Nepali medium schools, although EMI is now considered a need in many schools as well. EMI is causing friction between private and community schools in Nepal. There is a common notion that private schools celebrate good results because of EMI. However, their success is due to a variety of circumstances. As we all know, Nepal is celebrating its diverse language, religion, ethnicity, and race. Despite its modest size, the country is rich in language and culture. The documents include the Nepalese Constitution 2072, the National Curriculum Framework 2076, the Education Act 2028, the School Sector Development Plan, and the School Sector Reform Plan 2072. Multilingual education initiatives focus on mother tongue-based multilingual education, particularly at the primary level. However, these documents, notably the Basic Level Curriculum 2076 (Grade 1-3), expressly state that English can be used as the medium of instruction for subjects like as Science and Mathematics. So, these materials are confusing educators.
Institutionalization and Socio-economic Impact of English
Institutionalization and Socio-economic Impact of English, the introduction of English into Nepal’s Schools has drastically shifted the educational and social landscape of the country. Initially introduced in Nepal during the Rana regime as a sign of elite status and modernity, today, the English language is a powerful form of social mobility and academic status (Bhattarai & Basnet, 2020; Pennycook, 2018; Saud, 2020). English is now being taught and is increasingly being used as the medium of instruction in private schools, and for teaching in public schools. This shift shows the belief that knowledge of English brings quality education, global prospects (Adhikari, 2021; Sharma & Thapa, 2022). English is a language linked with power and a similar form of status in society. Even less advantaged families like to send their children to private schools as a result of EMI opportunities. The spread of EMI in private schools happened very quickly, and now private schools are popping up everywhere. Even at the local government level, they are encouraging EMI in Dipayal, Silgadhi Municipality and Doti by making EMI compulsory at the local government level. Such efforts surely show their enthusiasm for English. The establishment of English in the institutional context of Nepal has profoundly changed the educational space and society in Nepal. English, which was introduced into the country during the Rana regime as a marker of elite status and modernity, has evolved into a powerful vehicle for social mobility and academic prestige. English is now taught and is also frequently used as the medium of instruction in private schools, and increasingly in public schools. This shift reflects an underlying belief that proficiency in English brings quality education, global opportunity, and upward social mobility. It is connected with power and distinguished status in society. Even low-income families prefer to send their children to private schools due to EMI. It has spread quickly, and private schools are mushrooming. Even the local government is encouraging the English language in Dipayal, Silgadhi Municipality and Doti, and they have made EMI compulsory at the local level. This kind of exercise certainly demonstrates a love of the English language.
Social Justice through EMI
The use of EMI in Nepal’s education system affects the potential for social justice. It creates unequal access to the quality of teaching provided by EMI. Students from urban, high backgrounds admitted in present-day private schools receive a rich education, while students from rural, i.e. low-income backgrounds have limited access to and practice with English, especially in community schools. Students from urban, high-income backgrounds who are admitted to private schools. Recently, they received a wealth of educational resources, while students from rural, low-income backgrounds have little access to and practice of English, particularly in community schools (Bhattarai & Basnet, 2020; Timsina & Rai, 2019). This is not just an academic disadvantage for community school students, but a social reproduction disadvantage. English is a vital and crucial part of employment and the upper social class (Sharma & Thapa, 2022). Likewise, EMI is associated with colonialism, Western culture. This is the disadvantage of community school students in terms of not simply academic outcomes, but also social reproduction. English is a major and essential part of employment and higher social standing. Similarly, EMI is linked with colonial influence and Western culture. Hence, EMI develops the disintegration of multiple indigenous languages and cultures, with destruction, linguistic inequality and cultural detachment of Nepalese students. Language and culture are interrelated with each other when language enters the nation; it inherently brings its culture. Not all students have the same access to English. Children from rich or urban families often go to private schools where they learn English. But many poor or rural students go to local schools where English is not taught well, or not at all. This creates a big gap in learning. I have mentioned subtopics about social injustice below.
Access and Variation in Education
Ethnic and linguistic minority students’ experiences show that the separation between private and public education in Nepal deepened by the introduction of EMI. Private schools as one of the most well-resourced and culturally competent educational forms in the country, which offer high-quality EMI programmes for wealthy and prosperous families. Community schools, in contrast, work with families representing rural, low-income people. The inequalities linked with education lead to collected effects on the lives of oppressed families and students who cannot afford private schools and are unable to get quality education.
Neglecting people and Cultural perception
The practice of English-only instruction in education and public life results in the social disuse of languages like Doteli, Maithili, Tamang, Newari, and others. As parents work to give their children better opportunities, they encourage their children to speak English, and younger generations are abandoning their languages altogether. These parents are unknowingly sending messages of cultural disconnection and eventually loss of language. The emphasis on individual economic advancement negates Nepal’s multilingual identity and values. The present generation is taught English, leaving their mother tongues.
Socioeconomic Stratification and Symbolic Power
In Nepal, the ability to speak English is becoming a social marker for intelligence, achievement, and social status. Students with fluent English abilities will command a greater amount of respect and access to higher education, government work, and business opportunities in society. The symbolic power of English establishes class boundaries, because only individuals who are recognized can afford EMI-based education. Thus, another protector of advantage is language, namely, the exclusion of individuals who cannot engage.
In Nepal, the importance of English has led to the marginalization of other native languages. Marginalization means the inconsequence associated with what is not major, not central, and not powerful. In Nepal, English is preferred in every sector, including education, banking, hospitals, and so on. Private schools teach in English, and students who speak good English are often given more respect and better opportunities. Because of this, many parents want their children to learn English instead of their own mother tongue. As a result, local languages like Doteli, Newari, Maithili, Tamang, Tharu and many others are being used less, especially by young people.
In higher education, government jobs and business English are often liked. This makes it harder for people who speak only Nepali to compete. When one language becomes more powerful, others slowly lose their importance. This is how English, even without meaning to, is pushing local languages aside. The government even mandates English as a subject in the early grades. It has been made a compulsory subject from grade 1 to the bachelor’s level. It has secret power in Nepalese society. In the context of Nepal, many parents prefer to send their children to private schools. English is synonymous with high-quality education in Nepal. Privatization in education is widespread in Nepal. Private schools are proliferating and offer English-medium teaching. Such private schools reflect English culture, including Halloween. English has had a significantly greater influence on the local language, culture, and identity.
Conclusion
Overall, the article analyses the essentialist celebration of English as a neutral instrument of development. It advocates for a more critical and socially just approach to language planning that recognizes English’s potential for global utility while also protecting linguistic rights, cultural heritage, and equitable access to education. Stunning, this balance is essential in supporting Nepal as it negotiates its multifaceted identity and aspirations in a globalized landscape. In Nepal, many local schools are switching mediums of instruction from local languages to English as the medium of instruction. While Nepal is a UN state that has a language in education policy, which was developed upon recommendations to educate children in their mother tongue and promote bilingualism for better long-term learning, the policy is hardly followed in practice. The official approach, as mother tongue-based multilingual education is encoded, has been replaced with EMI, which runs counter to its intentions. The transition to EMI was fast-tracked after Nepal adopted a federal system of government in 2015, where local governments had power over local language policy. Although this national plan (2016-2023) sought to endorse local languages, almost all local governments, especially in urban areas, have chosen EMI.
References
Adhikari, R. (2021). The impact of English as a medium of instruction on indigenous languages in Nepal. Language Policy and Society, 7(3), 210–225.
Bhattarai, M., & Basnet, J. (2020). English Language Teaching and Social Stratification in Nepal. Nepalese Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 78–95.
Kafle, N. P. (2023). Language policy and practice in Nepal: English as a medium of instruction. Journal of Language and Education, 9(1), 45–62.
Pennycook, A. (2018). The cultural Politics of English as an international language. Routledge.
Saud, M.S. (2020). English medium public schools in Nepal: A new linguistic market in education. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language,23(2), 319-333.
Sharma, S., & Thapa, D. (2022). English-Medium education and social inequality in Nepal: A critical overview. International Journal of Multilingual Education, 14(2), 102–118.
Timsina, L., & Rai, P. (2019). Multilingual education and policy challenges in Nepal. Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 33–47.
Author’s Bio: Mr. Nar Bahadur Bist is an ELT practitioner from Doti, Nepal. He is currently pursuing an MPhil in ELT from Kathmandu University, School of Education. He is an English instructor at Seti Technical School, Rajpur, and a secondary-level teacher at Martyrs Memorial Residential Secondary School, Doti. His areas of interest include English language teaching, linguistic study, EMI and ELT study of language, and teacher professional development. He can be reached at narbist22@gmail.com.
Project-based language learning is a procedural approach of language learning activities through the planning, exploring, analyzing, and synthesizing, in which the learners present their findings in the class either orally or in written form (Beckett, 1999). Dhungana (2025) believes that the project-based learning (PBL) model encourages students to learn actively by using different strategies to develop their language skills and improve achievement. He further supported this model as an opportunity and a transformative method to develop the 21st-century skills in the learners to maintain international standards. Furthermore, PBL creates a productive environment for learning, but the projects are to be selected rigorously, students are to be guided in each step, and there should be proper assessment of the students to encourage all of them for meaningful learning and cosy presentation in the class (Fleming, 2000). PBL can be taken as an innovative and inquiry-based learning method that fosters learners’ active engagement in language learning through continuous guidance of teachers and exploration of students. This framework of learning develops not only the language skills but also the soft skills during the process of conducting and completing the project works (Ecuador, 2019; Maulina, 2024; Nasir & Dermawan, 2021).
The concept of PBL was developed by stepping on the project method (Kilpatrick, 1918), experiential learning and teaching (Dewey, 1938), and sociocultural theory (Vygotsky, 1978). Similarly, the historical steps for this approach began after the 1980s, when a task-based approach to language learning took place in ELT (Beckett & Slater, 2005; Wang, 2020). In the context of Nepal, this method gained value in the Nepalese education system when the national curriculum framework (2076 B.S.) envisioned life skill-based and competency-based subject-wise curricula. Then, the English curricula and textbooks, including other subjects, incorporated project works after each chapter of the textbooks from grades six to twelve. Additionally, the curriculum development centre has designed an internal evaluation guideline (2080 B.S.), which provides rubrics to evaluate students’ project works and other academic activities objectively and reliably.
Regarding empirical studies on project-based learning (PBL), the existing literature focuses on the effectiveness, challenges, and possibilities of PBL in the EFL classroom (Dhungana, 2025; Sanchez, 2019; Maulina, 2024; Devkota et al., 2017; Guslyakova et al., 2021; Aldabbus, 2018). Likewise, other studies have focused on how PBL fosters learner active participation and confidence of students in EFL classrooms (Aubrey, 2021; Giri, 2016; Nasir & Dermawan, 2022). Furthermore, Bastola (2021) examined how PBL can guide students to solve problems while learning English. Acharya (2023) analyzed the perceptions, practices, and challenges while applying PBL in health education. Gibbes and Carson (2014) scrutinized PBL from learners’ perspectives, Yuliani (2017) studied how PBL can enhance learner autonomy, and Somani and Rizvi (2018) compared PBL and traditional approaches of language teaching under a quasi-experimental design. However, I could not find the studies on PBL that investigated it to promote English language learner investment and integration of internal assessment with it.
I found my students avoiding investing in English language learning, which led them to low performance in all skills and aspects of language activities. Then, I asked them how much time they invest in English, and they replied that they only spent five to twenty minutes on English, and they again added that they usually do not pay much attention to the English subject, as they can pass it. I thought that if they depend only on classroom teaching and do not put in extra efforts outside the class, they might not perform what the are capable of. Similarly, overconfidence and exam-focused preparation in any subject is not good for knowledge and personal development. Therefore, this study aims to enhance learner investment through PBL incorporated with internal assessment techniques in secondary level students of Nepalese public schools by using the following research questions.
How does PBL, integrated with internal assessment, enhance learner investment in learning English?
What are the challenges and possibilities while implementing PBL in the EFL classroom?
Methods
As a practitioner teacher, I improve my professional practices with the help of action research by following the steps: planning, acting, observing, and reflecting (PAOR) (Burns, 2010). In this research, I have employed a project-based language learning approach integrated with an internal assessment system as the interventional technique to increase the time, effort, and dedication of my secondary level students in English language learning under the framework of technical action research by following the PAOR structure (Kemmis et al., 2014). The students of grade nine and ten (e.g. English medium sections of 9A and 10A), who numbered thirty and fifty students respectively, were the participants. I got my students to complete the projects mentioned in the textbook in regular teaching. Here I have presented projects: reading, writing, observing, and giving a speech project and peer/classroom teaching as the integrated project works, which I had provided during two long vacations, and I supported them to present their projects in the class. I observed how they have prepared and what resources they have studied, I collected their reports and looked at them closely, and I observed their classroom presentation by following the rubrics. Similarly, I had surveyed the status of students about their time, efforts, and dedication that they have about English language learning by asking open-ended questions. Finally, I analyzed the reflections that occurred in the class based on thematic analysis, followed by research questions and themes generated from classroom performance of students (Burns, 2010; Kemmis, McTaggart, & Nixon, 2014; Mertler, 2019).
Results and Discussion
Reading, Writing, Observing, and Giving Speech Project
As I had assigned the task of preparing a long essay, most of the students had prepared the essay as per the instructions, and a few students expressed the reasons for not completing the project work. And I provided them a few days to complete the task. Meanwhile, I provided feedback on their essays and guided them to make a final draft of the essay to record them in the file of project work. To make a clear understanding of the topic, we discussed the topic, and most of the students took part in the conversation actively. After the reading, writing, and observing (i.e., watching and listening) activities, students were taken towards preparing a draft of a speech to present in the class and one day, public speaking training was conducted by using multimedia and teaching the techniques of giving a speech. Students presented their speeches one by one every day. I evaluated their speech based on the modified criteria of internal assessment (e.g., report preparation-5, accuracy and clarity-5, confidence and style-5, content coverage-5, Timing-5), and I converted 25 marks into 16 marks to match the criteria of the internal assessment guideline, as there is a provision of testing listening and speaking for 16 marks. Thus, this project work contributed to the development of not only all language skills and aspects but also collaboration, confidence, creative, and interpretive skills as the students got help from peers, teachers, and other references during the process.
There was a girl who was unable to buy a copy for making notes, but she bought a grammar book and practice book, being encouraged to learn English after I conducted public speaking training for a week. I asked her, “Why and how did you manage the money for all these things?” She happily answered that she went to work on the farm as a labourer for five days and earned twenty five hundred rupees, which was enough for her. After such a long preparation, huge efforts, and investment of time, effort, and dedication, she was able to give such a nice performance. The integrated and task-based activities encourage students to be involved in learning activities for a long time (Joshi, 2024). He further claimed that the writing proficiency gaps could be maintained through continuous support to the students and involving them in publishing booklets of their project works. Similarly, Joshi (2025) claimed that the empathetic communication and supportive environment in the class help students to cope with stress during the preparation and presentation of academic activities. Furthermore, active participation and confidence of students can be enhanced through balanced project work in EFL classrooms (Aubrey, 2021; Giri, 2016). To sum up, it is certain that the PBL enhances the learner investment if the project works are designed carefully and if the students are supported in each step, not only in the classroom but also through technology and library resources.
Classroom/Peer Teaching Project
My English medium students were good at reading and average at speaking and writing skills. Therefore, I guided them to select any reading text and prepare for teaching to develop all their language skills integratively. Therefore, I provided this project work during the long holiday of Dashain and Tihar. When the classes began, I checked my students’ project works and provided feedback on their word meanings, answers to the comprehension questions, and other tasks that they had worked on. Before getting them to present their lessons, I explained and clarified their confusion related to the texts. I guided my co-teachers (students) to present their lessons at the beginning of the class within the timeframe of ten to twenty minutes, but some students requested the whole period of 45 minutes, and then I checked their preparation first and allowed them to take the whole class, ensuring detailed preparation. Meanwhile, I facilitated and judged them during their presentations. Some of the students presented excellent, and some did average. However, the hopeful point was that they maximized their time, efforts, and devotion in English language learning activities.
There was a boy in grade ten who used to stay passive in the class, but he used to ask questions related to English, not related to the current topic. When I provided him a chance to teach, he taught in such a way that students exclaimed with delight that his performance was perfect. After the presentation, I asked him how much time he had spent preparing for the lesson, and he replied with pride that he had spent a week for the preparation; consulting extra books, watching YouTube videos, and discussing with Chat GPT to prepare the lesson. Similarly, there was a girl in grade nine who was assumed to be fussy as she used to remain passive but talkative with her friends. She was average in subject matter, quiet, and not interested in communicative activities in English. However, when she got a chance to present her lesson, she used a clear, confident, commanding voice while teaching and used English most of the time. I asked her the same question, and she replied that she had worked two weeks to prepare a lesson. Rusli et al. (2021) accepted that peer teaching is significant to enhance the academic achievement of students as it creates an environment that develops confidence and motivation. Yuliani (2017) also supported this and claimed that PBL promotes learner autonomy.
Integration of Internal Evaluation with PBL
National Curriculum Framework (2076), Secondary Level Curriculum (2078), and Internal evaluation criteria (2080) recommend the incorporation of internal evaluation of English from nine to twelve with regular learning facilitation process through creative tasks and project works. Similarly, there are listening and speaking skills to be tested separately for 16 marks. However, the curriculum’s intention is for integrated language learning activities. Therefore, I decided to test language skills integratively through project works that I discussed earlier. I tested listening and speaking skills as per the curriculum during the classroom teaching. Saud et al. (2024) also emphasized the modification of internal assessment rubrics to contribute to learning language with a holistic approach rather than just evaluating students’ achievement.
Challenges and Possibilities of PBL in EFL Classrooms
Besides the unlimited benefits of project-based learning, due to more closures of schools and frequent holidays, not all of the students got a chance to present their projects by taking the sufficient time they wanted. Additionally, the lack of time challenged me as well because I could not conduct learning activities by covering all the projects mentioned in the textbook. Although the students were motivated to engage in project work, a few students got frustrated due to the lack of resources that they required to prepare for the projects. Some students have neither access to additional materials nor the library (e.g., physical or digital), in the initial stage, they did not accept these PBL techniques as it was new and had never been presented in class before as a regular part of learning, so the lack of confidence prevented them from smooth learning. Similarly, the students with a poor language base tried to avoid the project works, but they did so after the huge support and encouragement.
Despite the challenges, the project-based language-learning model creates space for an open, context-specific, and active learning environment if we can manage the challenges mentioned earlier. Similarly, the effective implementation of internal evaluation incorporated with regular teaching and PBL techniques can ensure the required investment and engagement of all learners and support for proficiency gaps as well. The internal evaluation criteria are used for providing marks to prepare results, but these have not been incorporated effectively with classroom teaching and internal evaluation in many schools, due to students feeling threatened in project works without a support system (Saud et al., 2024). Therefore, only after creating supportive mechanisms and effective implementation of internal evaluation can learning opportunities be provided (Joshi, 2025). Devkota et al. (2017) explored the challenges and opportunities, and their findings are also similar to my study, as they mentioned that the time and school environment play vital roles in making PBL more fruitful in EFL classrooms.
Conclusion
As the purpose of the study, the investment in students for the English subject increased at a satisfactory level. I wanted my students to spend at least an hour every day. However, some of them provided up to two to three hours, two weeks, and most of them gave an hour happily, although they used to give only five to twenty minutes. Similarly, they increased their efforts and invested money not only in reference materials but also invested time to consult the library. As a result, they performed better in the class, their handwriting improved, clarity and confidence increased, and they learnt collaborative skills to give and take help in the learning process. Although the project work was new and unique, and the previous trend was just a repetition of the course content in vacations, my students accepted the plan for project work easily after they observed some project works in videos. Not only during the project work but also in regular teaching, the technique (e.g., encouraging students to share their learning in the class as a task or a project) made students alert and prepared. This study will be helpful and a reference for those English language teachers who want to implement PBL in EFL classrooms to enhance learners’ active participation, and for language policy designers to revise the internal assessment guideline in the coming days. This study only presented the reflections of two project works, just for internal assessment and fostering learner investment, and further investigations can be conducted to integrate soft skills in the language learning process through project-based learning.
References
Acharya, S. (2023). Perceptions, practices, and challenges of applying project-based learning in health education.Journal of Education and Practice, 14(2), 112–121.
Aldabbus, S. (2018). Project-based learning: Possibilities and challenges in primary classrooms.International Journal of Education and Research, 6(4), 75–88.
Aubrey, S. (2021). Enhancing English language learner engagement through project-based learning.TESOL Quarterly, 55(3), 780–804.
Bastola, B. (2021). Project-based learning to develop problem-solving skills in English language classrooms.Journal of NELTA, 26(1–2), 45–58.
Beckett, G. H. (1999). Project-based instruction in a Canadian secondary school’s ESL classes: Goals and evaluations [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of British Columbia, Canada.
Burns, A. (2009). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge.
Curriculum Development Centre. (2019). National curriculum framework for school education. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
Curriculum Development Centre. (2021). Secondary level (Grades 9–10) English curriculum. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
Curriculum Development Centre. (2023). Internal evaluation guideline for school education. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2023). Investment and motivation in language learning: What’s the difference?. Language Teaching, 56(1), 29-40.
Devkota, B., Karki, R., & Shrestha, S. (2017). Challenges and possibilities of implementing project-based learning in EFL classrooms in Nepal.Journal of Education and Research, 7(1), 32–49.
Dhungana, A. (2025). Investigating the effectiveness and implementation challenges of project-based learning: A case study of public school teachers in Chitwan, Nepal. Journal of Balkumari College, 14(1), 89-96.
Dhungana, K. (2025). Effectiveness and implementation challenges of project-based learning in English language teaching.Nepal Journal of Language Education, 10(1), 15–28.
Gibbes, M., & Carson, L. (2014). Project-based language learning: Learners’ perspectives.Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 171–189.
Ginting, D. (2021). Student engagement and factors affecting active learning in English language teaching. Voices of English Language Education Society, 5(2), 215-228.
Giri, R. A. (2016). Project-based learning as a 21st-century approach in English language teaching.NELTA Journal, 21(1–2), 12–25.
Guslyakova, L., Kuznetsova, N., & Ivanova, E. (2021). Problems of implementing project-based learning in EFL classrooms.European Journal of Education Studies, 8(10), 34–46.
Joshi, D. R. (2024). Teachers’ experiential strategies for bridging writing proficiency gaps among secondary level students. Far Western Review, 2(2), 91-105.
Joshi, D. R. (2025). Exploring counselling-based pedagogy in EFL classrooms: Perceived values of English language teachers in Nepal. Far Western Journal of Education, 2, 57-73.
Karki, S. (2018). Effectiveness of project work in developing students’ speaking skills. Journal of NELTA, 23(1–2), 101–113.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer.
Maulina, M. (2024). Empowering English language learners through project-based learning for language proficiency.Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 66–78.
Mertler, C. A. (2019). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Nasir, M., & Dermawan, A. (2022). Enhancing learners’ participation and confidence through project-based learning in EFL contexts.Asian EFL Journal, 24(5), 90–104.
Rusli, M., Degeng, N. S., Setyosari, P., & Sulton. (2021). Peer teaching: Students teaching students to increase academic performance. Teaching Theology & Religion, 24(1), 17-27.
Sanchez, R. (2019). Effectiveness of project-based learning to improve students’ speaking skills.English Language Teaching Journal, 12(6), 123–134.
Saud, M.S., Aryal, S., & Sapkota, J.L. (2024). Student assessment in formal education: Nepali community school teachers’ perspectives. Prithvi Academic Journal, 7, 67-77.
Somani, R., & Rizvi, M. (2018). A comparative study of project-based and traditional approaches in English language teaching: A quasi-experimental design.International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 15–30.
Yuliani, S. (2017). Promoting learner autonomy through project-based learning in EFL classrooms.Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(2), 68–77.
Author’s Bio: Dev Ram Joshi is an English language teacher at Mahunyal Secondary School, Bhajani-1, Kailali and the MPhil scholar at Far Western University, Nepal. He has been teaching English at the secondary level for over ten years. His areas of research interest include language proficiency gaps, psycholinguistics, motivation, transformative pedagogy, learner empowerment, self-directed learning and professional development, ecosystem in language education, and ELT material development. He can be reached at teacherdrjoshi@gmail.com.
Teaching English in a linguistically diverse classroom presents a complex challenge, particularly in a multilingual context like Nepal, where students bring with them rich linguistic backgrounds from their homes and communities. I teach at Sharada Secondary School, a community school located in Itahari, Sunsari. Since 2022, I have been working with students from various ethno-linguistic backgrounds, including Tharu, Rai, Limbu, Maithili, and Nepali. Reflecting on my experience of teaching English in such a diverse setting, I initially employed an English-only approach as the medium of instruction, instituting rules that enforced speaking only English in the classroom. I felt a sense of satisfaction as the class remained silent. However, after some time, I began to realize that the students’ silence and passivity were not conducive to effective learning. This reflection prompted me to adopt more reflective practices, which are essential for teachers’ professional growth and for addressing the everyday challenges that arise in teaching (Rauteda, 2024b).
The disengagement of my students became a significant concern for me. I encountered numerous challenges during class, particularly regarding student motivation and engagement. I observed that many students were hesitant to speak, fearful of making mistakes, and often remained passive throughout the lessons. This situation forced me to reflect critically on my teaching methods and seek alternative pedagogical approaches. Consequently, I adopted translanguaging as an intervention in the classroom—an approach that allows students to utilize their full linguistic repertoire in the learning process (Gaarcia & Wei, 2014; Phyak, 2018; Rauteda, 2022; 2024a). This reflective writing aims to provide an in-depth analysis of a moment when my teaching successfully engaged the majority of my students through a planned intervention using translanguaging pedagogy within a PAR framework. In this discussion, I outlined what I did, what the students did, and the reasons I believe the lesson was effective, supported by theoretical insights and research findings.
The Problem Identified: A Disengaged and Struggling Classroom
At the beginning of my career, I worked at private colleges in the Kathmandu Valley, where monolingual instruction was preferred in ELT classrooms. This practice shaped my teaching habits. After passing the Teacher Service Commission (TSC) examination, I became a permanent teacher at a government school, where I attempted to apply the methods I had previously used in private colleges. Initially, my English classes were dominated by monolingual practices, focusing solely on English instruction, as dictated by the traditional curriculum. However, I quickly noticed that my students were hesitant to participate. Even basic questions often went unanswered. Their lack of confidence and visible anxiety toward English created a barrier to meaningful engagement. I found my students completely silent in the classroom. Despite using various materials such as pictures, slides, and English-language videos, the students remained passive and showed little interest. I then realized that this silence was a result of implementing a monolingual instructional approach in a multilingual setting. In this context, Garcia and Wei (2014) argue that monolingual methods in multilingual environments can alienate learners and limit their ability to express their understanding.
The students’ silence, lack of participation, and poor writing skills indicated a need for change. I realized that their home languages were being ignored in the classroom, causing English to feel disconnected from their everyday lives. As a teacher in a multilingual community, this contradiction deeply troubled me. One day, I asked my learners in the Nepali language why they remained silent in my class. They explained that they did not understand the language I used during lessons. The majority of them requested that I incorporate both Nepali and English in the classroom to enhance their understanding. Consequently, their demands and my realizations prompted me to seek alternative ways of teaching English in a multilingual context. This led me to consider translanguaging pedagogy through participatory action research (PAR).
Planning for Change: Participatory Action Research as a Tool
In response to students’ disengagement and lack of motivation, I chose to conduct action research within my ELT classroom to address the identified issues. I made this decision with the belief that action research provides practical solutions to everyday challenges and fosters professional growth for teachers (Rauteda, 2025a). Subsequently, I planned to implement PAR, which is a cyclical process comprising planning, acting, observing, and reflecting (Cohen et al., 2018). PAR allowed me to include my students as co-participants in the learning process. I designed a translanguaging-based intervention that enabled students to utilize their full linguistic repertoires (Garcia, 2009; Rauteda, 2022). According to Garcia and Wei (2014), translanguaging involves deploying students’ complete linguistic abilities without strictly adhering to the boundaries typically associated with named languages (national and state languages). Based on the benefits of using hybrid language practices in ELT classrooms, I aimed to employ translingual practices to create space for students’ home languages in the learning environment. Through PAR, I sought to transform my pedagogical approach by engaging students in a culturally and linguistically responsive manner. Additionally, my goal was to enhance student engagement in classroom activities through empowerment, while also seeking pedagogical empowerment for myself.
Conceptual Understanding of Translanguaging
Translanguaging is a language practice used by bilingual and multilingual speakers, wherein individuals naturally, dynamically, and purposefully utilize various languages and linguistic resources simultaneously (Garcia, 2009). This concept was first developed by Cen Williams in 1994, who created opportunities for students to alternate languages in their reading and writing, as well as in their receptive and productive skills (Garcia & Leiva, 2014). Translanguaging refers to the intentional mixing of different languages (Rauteda, 2024a). As Garcia (2009) notes, translanguaging involves the use of multiple linguistic practices by bilingual individuals to navigate their bilingual environments. Multilingual speakers can fluidly transition between languages, viewing their linguistic repertoire as a cohesive system (Canagarajah, 2011). Scholars have referred to translanguaging using various terms, including ‘polylingualism’ (Jorgenson, 2008), ‘metrolingualism’ (Pennycook, 2010), ‘codemeshing’ (Canagarajah, 2011), and ‘pluriliteracy’ (Garcia, 2009). From a language use perspective, translanguaging is a flexible and strategic approach that employs multiple languages (Garcia & Wei, 2014). This approach can assist students in developing both their cognitive and socio-emotional skills while leveraging the diverse and dynamic language practices of learners (Garcia & Kleyn, 2016; Vogel & Garcia, 2017). Consequently, translanguaging serves as a valuable practice for multilingual learners, addressing diversity in the classroom and promoting social justice by maximizing the use of each learner’s linguistic repertoire. It can also empower disadvantaged students who face barriers solely due to language differences. Moreover, Li Wei (2011) introduces the concept of a “translanguaging space,” which serves as a framework illustrating the setting in which students can utilize all their linguistic, cultural, and epistemic assets in the learning process. In my classroom, instead of separating languages, I embraced them as complementary resources. I encouraged students to use languages they are familiar with, such as Tharu, Maithili, Limbu, or Nepali, to express their thoughts, scaffold their learning, and produce creative outputs.
Implementing Translanguaging Pedagogy
As a teacher-researcher, I implemented translanguaging using various strategies at different stages. In the following sections, I present details on how I enacted translanguaging within a PAR framework, the impact of this intervention on my teaching, and what the intervention achieved. This information is organized into themes and subthemes.
Designing the Activity
I designed an activity focused on creating or collecting stories in the languages that students are proficient in. The purpose of this activity was to enhance their writing skills, encourage interaction, and appreciate local knowledge. Additionally, it aimed to promote co-learning and bridge the gap between the classroom, content, and community.
For this task, I divided the class into eight heterogeneous groups, mixing students from different language backgrounds. This grouping encouraged peer learning and cross-cultural dialogue. Each group created and collected stories in their preferred languages. They then presented these stories in the classroom and discussed them among group members. After the discussions, the stories were translated into multiple languages, including Tharu, Nepali, English, and Rai. Finally, the stories were compiled and presented as multilingual, multimodal storybooks. As a post-method teacher, I aimed to theorize my practice and apply theoretical concepts, using these activities to scaffold my students’ learning. I wanted to connect them with their culture, language, and community. Consequently, this activity aligned with Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory, particularly the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), which emphasizes the importance of social interaction and scaffolding in learning (Vygotsky, 1978).
What the Students Were Doing
Students engaged in various activities both individually and in groups. They created and collected stories, participated in discussions, made presentations, translated texts, transformed stories into multimodal formats, and even organized them into a book. Their involvement in these activities led to significant changes in their behavior and attitudes. The intervention fostered collaboration, cooperation, engagement, and motivation among the students, helping them develop a sense of agency (Rauteda, 2022; 2024; Rauteda & Luitel, 2025; Rauteda, 2025b). Moreover, this experience transformed the students’ behavior. Those who had previously remained silent became active participants, displaying excitement while collecting stories from elders in their communities. Sharing these stories in class instilled a sense of pride in them. They began to view their languages and cultures not as obstacles but as bridges to learning English. In their groups, students discussed word choices, translated idioms, and assisted one another in crafting coherent narratives. The classroom evolved into a lively, collaborative space filled with energy and multilingual dialogue. Students not only practiced English but also enhanced their thinking, reading, and writing skills.
What I Was Doing as a Teacher
As a teacher, I shifted my role from the sole authority to a facilitator and co-learner. I moved around the groups, providing language support, answering questions, and encouraging dialogue. I praised their efforts in both languages and emphasized the value of their home languages. Instead of correcting every mistake, I focused on meaning-making and creative expression. I also created space for students to present their stories to the whole class, which boosted their confidence. This student-centered pedagogy reflects Freire’s concept of dialogic education (Freire, 1970), where learning emerges through mutual dialogue and respect.
Classroom Outcomes of Translanguaging Pedagogy through PAR
The primary objective of implementing this pedagogical strategy was to enhance student engagement in ELT classrooms and to develop students’ writing proficiency in English. The integration of translanguaging pedagogy within a PAR framework proved to be particularly effective in a multilingual and culturally diverse classroom. This approach not only supported students’ linguistic and academic growth but also improved classroom management by fostering greater learner participation, collaboration, and empowerment. Through this intervention, students were encouraged to draw upon their full linguistic repertoires, which made learning more inclusive, dynamic, and responsive to their lived experiences. The following sub-sections illustrate the transformative outcomes of this pedagogical approach, highlighting how translanguaging through PAR contributed to culturally and linguistically responsive teaching, enhanced literacy and language development, increased learner agency, and strengthened classroom relationships.
Culturally and Linguistically Responsive Pedagogy
Teaching is more effective when it is closely connected to culture and language. Research studies (Garcia & Wei, 2014; Phyak, 2023; Rauteda, 2022) have shown that language instruction is most effective when linguistic and cultural diversity are celebrated and respected in the classroom. Furthermore, these practices can lead to increased engagement, motivation, and academic achievement (Gay, 2010). During the project, the students worked on local phenomena. They wrote, collected, and translated stories from their local context and even used their home language. This practice helped them connect with their culture. By validating cultural norms and local languages, I was able to teach in a culturally and linguistically responsive way. It fostered the students’ identities and made them proud of their culture and language, which boosted their confidence. Throughout the project, the students became more motivated and confident, and they developed a more positive attitude towards their learning. By integrating home languages into the classroom, I created a safe space where students felt seen, respected, and capable. Thus, translanguaging enabled me to be accountable to local culture and language, enhancing my students’ engagement and motivation in the classroom.
Enhanced Literacy and Language Skills
The intervention significantly enhanced both literacy and language skills among the students. Through activities such as storytelling, translation, and group discussions, students cultivated a range of literacies. They learned to navigate between languages, structure narratives, and articulate complex ideas. This aligns with Hornberger’s (2003) “Continua of biliteracy” model, which advocates for literacy development across diverse languages and modalities. Furthermore, as students engaged in tasks like searching for equivalent words in online dictionaries and Google, they also improved their digital literacy. Ultimately, they became more familiar with the structure and organization of books. This experience demonstrates that involving students in multilingual activities can effectively foster both language skills and digital literacy.
Increased Participation and Agency
Agency refers to an individual’s capacity to act, initiate actions, self-regulate, or effect change in their circumstances. It can also be viewed as a form of resistance (Giddens, 1984; Ortner, 1984). Additionally, agency encompasses an individual’s ability to apply principles or theories in specific contexts. In this case, the intervention served to enhance the agency of both the teacher and the students, as they challenged the monolingual instruction and enacted micro-level resistance in the classroom through translanguaging (Rauteda & Luitel, 2025). Moreover, the students assumed greater ownership of their learning. Group work fostered accountability and collaboration, empowering them to become autonomous learners willing to take risks in their education. Consequently, they developed a stronger connection with each other and the classroom environment. Their engagement increased as they transitioned from passive recipients of knowledge to active creators of knowledge.
Building Relationships
Establishing a good rapport is crucial for effective teaching and learning. In my research, the intervention played a significant role in fostering positive relationships between the teacher and students, as well as among the learners themselves. The activities allowed me to connect with my students on a deeper level, enabling me to learn about their lives, traditions, and communication styles. This emotional connection not only built trust, which is vital for successful learning, but also encouraged students to share personal experiences, which has proven beneficial for their psychological well-being. As they began to support one another, share ideas, and collaborate, they expressed a preference for group work as part of their assignments. As a result, teaching became more effective, promoting linguistic inclusivity, collaborative learning, real-world applications, a redefined role for teachers and students, and opportunities for creative expression.
Conclusion
This reflective narrative demonstrates how the implementation of translanguaging pedagogy within a PAR framework significantly enhanced learner engagement in a multilingual English classroom. By integrating students’ home languages alongside English, I was able to create a culturally responsive environment where learners felt valued, confident, and motivated. The intervention not only promoted active participation, literacy development, and student agency but also transformed my own role from a traditional authority figure to a facilitator and co-learner.
The experience reveals several key insights. First, monolingual approaches can silence learners in linguistically diverse classrooms, whereas translanguaging affirms students’ linguistic and cultural identities. Second, translanguaging fosters collaboration and mutual respect, enabling learners to connect classroom activities with the knowledge they bring from their communities. Third, these practices contribute to broader educational goals by promoting equity and social justice in language teaching.
For teachers in similar contexts, this reflection suggests that translanguaging can serve as a potent pedagogical tool for bridging gaps between students’ lived experiences and classroom learning. Although this account is based on a specific classroom experience, it emphasizes the importance of embracing multilingual resources in ELT. Future reflective and research-based studies could further explore how translanguaging can be systematically integrated into classroom practices across Nepal.
References
Canagarajah, S. (2011). Translanguaging in the classroom: Emerging issues for research and pedagogy. Applied Linguistics Review, 2(1), 1–28.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. Routledge.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Herder and Herder.
Garcia, O. & Leiva, C. (2014). Theorizing and enacting translanguaging for social justice. In Blackledge, A., & Creese, A. (eds.), Heteroglossia as practice and pedagogy (pp. 199-216). Springer.
García, O. (2009). Bilingual education for the 21st century: A global perspective. Wiley Black-Well.
Garcia, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. Palgrave Macmillan.
Garcia, O., and Kleyn, T. (2016). Translanguaging theory in education. In O. Garcia and T. Kleyn (eds), Translanguaging with multilingual students, (pp. 23–47). Routledge.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
Giddens, A. (1984). Constitution of society polity press. Cambridge.
Hornberger, N. H. (2003). Continua of biliteracy. Multilingual Matters.
Jorgensen, J. N. (2008). Polylingual languaging around and among children and adolescents. International Journal of Multilingualism, 5(3), 161–176.
Li, W. (2011). Moment analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(5), 1222-1235.
Ortner, S. B. (1984). Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26(1), 126-166.
Pennycook, A. 2010. Language as a local practice. Routledge.
Phyak, P. (2018). Translanguaging as a pedagogical resource in English language teaching: A response to unplanned language education policies in Nepal. In K. Kuchah & F. Shamim (Eds.), International Perspectives in Teaching English in Difficult Circumstances (pp. 49-70). Palgrave.
Phyak, P. (2023). Translanguaging as a space of simultaneity: theorizing translanguaging pedagogies in English medium schools from a spatial perspective. Modern Language Journal, 107(1), 289-307.
Rauteda, K. R. (2022). Translanguaging as a pedagogical resource in multilingual ELT classrooms: Exploring perceptions and practices [Master’s Thesis]. Tribhuvan University.
Rauteda, K. R. (2024a). Unveiling pedagogical translanguaging: Investigating teachers’ translingual practices and purposes in ELT classrooms. English Language Teaching Perspectives, 9(1-2), 51–66.
Rauteda, K. R. (2024b). Bending back to the professional activities: Unveiling the role of reflective practice in teachers’ professional development. Journal of NELTA Gandaki, 7(1-2), 98–110.
Rauteda, K. R. (2025a). English language teachers’ knowledge, use, and perceived effectiveness of action research for professional development. Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS), 11(1), 39-52.
Rauteda, K. R. (2025b). Translanguaging for transformation: Identity, equity, and pedagogical resistance in Nepalese ELT classrooms. Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS), 11(2), 150-162.
Rauteda, K. R., & Luitel, B. (2025). Teachers’ pedagogical resistance of EMI through classroom translanguaging in Nepalese science classrooms. IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching), 9(2), 441-456.
Vogel, S., & García, O. (2017). Translanguaging. In G. Noblit & L. Moll (Eds.). Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Author’s Bio: Mr. Khem Raj Rauteda is an MPhil scholar at the Graduate School of Education, Tribhuvan University, and a Lecturer of English Education at Janta Multiple Campus, Itahari. He has been actively involved in academic publishing for over five years, contributing research articles to both national and international journals. Rauteda has also served as a reviewer for several scholarly publications and has presented numerous papers at national and international conferences. His areas of interest are Translanguaging, CDA, Multilingualism, and Teachers’ Professional Development. He can be reached at krauteda@gmail.com.
Writing a thesis has always been a difficult and involved undertaking, especially for someone with a technical background like me. As an Electronics and Communication Engineer with further degrees in Technology and Innovation Management, and now concentrating in Information System Engineering, I frequently found communicating complicated technical thoughts in written academic form difficult. During my first master’s degree, I depended extensively on a friend with an English degree to help me polish my assignments. However, the development of artificial intelligence (AI) applications such as ChatGPT, QuillBot, and Grammarly transformed my academic path. These tools not only helped me write, but also gave me the confidence and inventiveness to handle the difficulties of thesis writing on my own. In this paper I reflect on my academic writing during thesis journey and explore how AI tools have influenced my experience and approach throughout the process.
What and Why AI in Academic Writing
Historically, academic writing relied mainly on human editors and static grammar tools. Today, AI has progressed into interactive and sophisticated writing assistants. In addition to thesis writing, AI techniques are now being used in language schools (Li, Xu, Li, and Shi , 2025). They help students with vocabulary development, grammatical checking, real-time feedback, and even conversation practice. This democratization of AI tools enables students from all language origins to confidently participate in academic writing and communication.
Artificial intelligence (AI), a dynamic subject of computer science, is intended to mimic human intelligence in activities such as problem solving, language understanding, and decision making (Russell & Norvig, 2016). With the advancement of advanced natural language processing (NLP) models, AI is becoming more integrated into academic writing. Tools like OpenAI’s GPT models have transformed the way scholars create, refine, and polish academic articles. The application of AI in academic writing increases productivity, ensures clarity, and assists writers with varied levels of linguistic proficiency.
AI as a Tool to Enhance Creativity in Academic Writing
AI has played an important role in improving the quality and clarity of my work. For example, ChatGPT helped me analyze data and draft complex thoughts. It guided me throughout the process of researching, writing, and publishing. To be specific, I used it to identify research gaps, decide on research design, review relevant literature and develop research tools, analyze data, and sharpen my language. While engaging in this prompt engineering, creating detailed and unambiguous instructions was critical to achieving the best outcomes. That is to say, making prompts with unambiguous instructions would allow getting an accurate result. A prompt like “Continue writing in a formal tone, maintaining coherence with the previous paragraphs” ensured that my writing style remained consistent throughout.
I used QuillBot, a paraphrasing tool, to reorganize and enhance my phrases. It ensured that my ideas remained original and well-articulated, which considerably improved the fluency and coherence of my arguments. . Its contribution to my thesis writing journey was critical in achieving clarity, coherence, and originality. The ability of QuillBot to improve the fluidity of my arguments while maintaining the integrity of my ideas has significantly improved the quality of my thesis content. It’s worth noting that, in some cases, I used ChatGPT to help with initial drafts, and QuillBot was invaluable in paraphrasing and fine-tuning the text. The seamless collaboration between ChatGPT and QuillBot ensured that the ideas generated by ChatGPT were refined and tailored to meet the desired excellence in academic writing. This collaboration produced a thesis that not only reflects my original ideas but also demonstrates a refined and coherent presentation of ideas, demonstrating the complementary nature of these AI tools in writing.
Grammarly provided linguistic precision by correcting grammar, punctuation, and stylistic problems in real time. The tool’s real-time suggestions and in-depth analysis not only saved my time, but also improved my document’s overall language proficiency, resulting in a polished and professional academic work.
As I progressed through the thesis writing process, a critical checkpoint for a plagiarism test held at Tribhuvan University’s Central Library. The researcher meticulously examined the document for any potential instances of plagiarism using the iThenticate software. The software revealed a commendable similarity index of 4%, which is significantly lower than the acceptable threshold of 20%. This success highlighted the prudent use of AI tools in ensuring the research’s originality and authenticity.
Apart from these, various AI- powered tools have emerged recently. These AI assistants ; Jenni (assists to devise precise heading and outlines for your research, Paperpal ( gives real time academic writing feedback and while Brainstorming, creating headings paraphrasing and proofreading ) ChatPDF( supports in literature review by summarizing the content), Research Rabbit (helps to review related literature by visualizing research networks), Zotero( manages references and generates notes) and many others have been widely used to reduce human effort and bring efficacy in writing.
Strengths and Challenges of AI in the 21st Century
AI tools can be used as a good research assistant from brainstorming to writing journal articles. Khalifa and Albadawy (2024) outline nine dimensions of using AI in research. They are: Idea development and research design, content development and structuring, literature review and synthesis, data management and analysis, editing, review and publishing support, communication, outreach, and ethical compliance. It increases creativity via idea generation and vocabulary development which in turn helps to enhance autonomy and fluency in writing process. AI has also been supportive to maintain accuracy in research reports and develop readability and refining language.
However, it is to be noted that AI tools are not fault –free. They occasionally generate inaccurate, biased or irrelevant content. Similarly, over-reliance on AI tools may hinder original thinking. It is risky that the author may skip the processes of analyzing, interpreting and evaluating ideas themselves which eventually curtail the skill of independent judgment. Moreover, relaying on the tools and their prompt results may keep the readers’ way from deep reading, reflecting and synthesizing ideas on their own. Moving forward with the advancement of AI tools there is a big question regarding the issues of ethical consideration around authorship and plagiarism. Khalifa and Albadawy (2024) conclude that a careful balance between utilization of AI and human insight is recommended to ensure that while AI invites efficiency and analytical power, the creativity and critical thinking inherent in human intelligence is not overshadowed. Hence, it is recommended that AI should be viewed as a complement to, rather than a replacement for, human critical thinking or intellectual endeavor. Otherwise it is possible that academic works turns into a mechanical exercise hindering in the development of high order skills like critical thinking, and criticizing.
Conclusion
With the proliferation of various advanced AI tools academic research and writing has been simplified, enhanced, efficient, and less labour- intensive. But too much reliance can stifle originality and critical thought. Challenges lies in balancing the benefits of AI with the need to uphold academic integrity. Therefore, it is imperative that they be used critically and ethically. AI tools should be used as a complement to rather than a substitute to academic rigor.
References
Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 100145.
Li X, Xu Y, Li P, Shi Y. Application of artificial intelligence in English teaching content innovation and teaching method optimization. Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering. 2025;25(3):2745-2755. doi:10.1177/14727978251321645
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Author’s Bio: Saban Kumar K.C. is a Senior Lecturer at Kathford International College (Affiliated to Tribhuvan University, Nepal), with a focus on Electronics, Communication, and Information Engineering. His research interests include deep learning, blockchain technology, IoT applications, and engineering education. He has published peer-reviewed papers and actively supervises undergraduate research and innovation projects. He is passionate about bridging technology with local development needs and promoting interdisciplinary approaches in engineering.
Growing up in a middle-class family with five siblings, my formative years were shaped by the love and care of my elders, instilling in me a sense of confidence and freedom. Among them, my father emerged as the most influential figure, guiding me with his hard work and selfless values. As I reflect on my educational journey and professional life, I realize how my father’s schooling continues to resonate, impacting my academic pursuits and shaping me into an educator who seeks to inspire and transform the lives of others.
The Enduring Legacy of My Father: Inspiring Values in My Academic Journey
Growing up in a modest family in the Baitadi district, my father’s determination, love for education, and selflessness left an indelible impact on my values, beliefs, and personal growth.
Despite their humble circumstances, my father’s family recognized the transformative power of education, impressing upon him the importance of prioritizing learning for a brighter future. Embracing this wisdom, he excelled academically and obtained top honours in the Kanchanpur district, the western part of Nepal. Working part-time to support his further studies, he completed B.Ed. in mathematics from Tribhuvan University, Nepal, and devoted over 36 years to teaching secondary-level mathematics in rural areas.
My father’s life experiences taught me the value of hard work, honesty, and unwavering determination to achieve my goals. His struggles also instilled in me a sense of gratitude for the opportunities I have today. His most profound lesson, however, was selflessness, his unwavering dedication to his family and society left an indelible impression on my character. As I pursued my academic journey, my father’s influence continued to guide me. Although my circumstances were more privileged, his lessons taught me that diligence and integrity make success possible.
His teachings not only shaped me as a good person but also as an authentic individual. I am determined to pass these invaluable lessons to my future family and students. With his enduring legacy as my compass, I seek to inspire and transform lives, just as my father has done throughout his remarkable journey.
Empowerment Through Education: A Personal Academic Journey
My academic journey commenced at home, where my family played the role of my first teachers, introducing me to alphabet belts and basic numbers. Though I began my formal education in a government school like my siblings, I had the privilege of studying in private (boarding) school (first in my family). This choice garnered public attention and prestige in our village, underscoring the value of education.
During my primary education, I excelled in memorization-based learning, securing top positions in my class. However, the system of rote learning limited my true understanding of the subjects. Shifting to government education posed initial challenges due to larger and more diverse classes, but I adapted over time, benefiting from a more flexible learning environment, albeit lacking student-centred approaches.
Upon completing my SLC, I went to Nainital India for my I.Sc., however I realized that my I.Sc. didn’t align with my interests, and faced language difficulties and homesickness. My family, understanding my predicament gave me the freedom to decide my academic path, leading me back to Mahendranagar, my hometown.
Embracing my interest in English, I pursued I.A. with English as my major subject. My academic journey continued rapidly, culminating in a B.A. with a major in English from Mahendranagar. My pursuit of higher education led me to Kathmandu, where I completed my M.A. in English literature from the central department of English in Kirtipur, achieving a first division. During my master’s studies, I harboured aspirations of becoming a police officer, inspired by the bold heroes of Hindi movies. However, my passion for teaching gradually surfaced, steering me away from the police force.
In this journey, education has played a pivotal role in empowering me intellectually. It provided me with knowledge, skills, and critical thinking abilities, enabling me to navigate various academic pursuits successfully. Furthermore, education has empowered me economically by opening doors to career opportunities and professional growth, allowing me to contribute meaningfully to society.
Education also fosters social empowerment, equipping me with the ability to share knowledge, mentor others, and contribute to the transformation of education in Nepal. Through my role as an educator, I have had the privilege of training teacher educators, presenting research papers at national and international conferences, and integrating innovative teaching strategies with ICT in language classrooms.
As I reflect on my academic journey, I recognize that education has been the key to my empowerment in multiple dimensions. Not only has it enriched my personal and professional life, but it has also instilled a deep sense of responsibility to empower others through the dissemination of knowledge and a commitment to transformative education.
Empowering Teaching Through Innovative Integration of ICT
As I embarked on my teaching journey at Darchula Multiple Campus, Khalanga, Darchula, Nepal in 2009 after completing my M.A. in English Literature from Tribhuvan University, I initially questioned whether teaching would become my true passion and profession. Not having an ELT background, my first experiences in university-level ELT classes left me feeling somewhat apprehensive. However, the positive responses and appreciation from both students and colleagues ignited a newfound enjoyment in teaching, leading me to realize that teaching was indeed my passion.
To improve my teaching skills and enhance my expertise in English Language Education further, I pursued a one-year B.Ed. and M.Ed. from Tribhuvan University. Determined to stay up to date with the latest pedagogy and educational technologies, I delved into integrating ICT into my ELT classrooms. The availability of ICT infrastructure, including computer labs, laptops, projectors, multimedia smart boards, and internet facilities, provided valuable tools to enrich the teaching and learning process.
The integration of ICT, though initially challenging, proved to be a motivating force in my teaching practices. Participating in various training sessions, workshops, webinars, and conferences, and learning from online resources like YouTube videos, I gradually adapted to using ICT more effectively in language classrooms. My colleagues often sought technical support from me when incorporating educational software such as MS Teams and Zoom during the transition to online classes amidst the pandemic.
Witnessing my students’ satisfaction and a keen interest in my classes further fueled my motivation to innovate in teaching by strategically incorporating ICT. A significant incident that highlights this impact occurred on 5th July 2021 when I was allowed to conduct ICT training for my colleagues at Far Western University Darchula Multiple Campus Khalanga Darchula. The training focused on using MS Team for upcoming online classes, and it became evident that many faculty members lacked familiarity with ICT in education. Their enthusiasm to learn and improve their ICT practices was inspiring. Guiding them through the basic functionalities of MS Team, such as creating class schedules, adding students as members, conducting quizzes, and facilitating group discussions, the session proved to be both engaging and fruitful, garnering appreciative comments from the participants and the dean of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences.
Despite facing challenges within the academic environment and culture, where well-performing teachers are sometimes undervalued or discriminated against based on political affiliations, I have remained steadfast in fulfilling my professional duties honestly and responsibly. The support and belief from my family, friends, and students have been instrumental in sustaining my resilience.
Through the transformative power of education and the innovative integration of ICT, my passion for teaching has flourished, empowering me intellectually and professionally. Beyond my personal growth, I aspire to be an agent of change, promoting the meaningful use of ICT in education and contributing to the advancement of the educational landscape in Nepal.
M.Phil. at Kathmandu University as a Gateway for Transformation
I decided to pursue an MPhil in English language education from Kathmandu University with the unwavering support and encouragement from my family, friends, and students. Their belief in my abilities and the significance of advancing my academic journey propelled me to seek an institution that would catalyze personal growth and transformation. In this esteemed institution, I got amazing mentors, whose mentorship equipped me with both theoretical knowledge and practical competencies, instilling in me the confidence to implement cutting-edge teaching strategies and adapt to the ever-evolving needs of my future students. Through their guidance, I deepened my understanding of English language education and acquired the necessary skills to become a proficient teacher for 21st-century learners. Engaging in teacher professional development activities, I was exposed to innovative teaching methods, educational technologies, and effective pedagogical approaches that are most relevant in today’s dynamic classroom environments.
Furthermore, the vibrant academic environment at Kathmandu University fostered a strong sense of community among fellow students. Collaborative projects, discussions, and academic events enriched my learning experience and provided me with diverse perspectives on educational practices. This supportive network of peers and colleagues further contributed to my personal and professional growth, creating a nurturing environment for exploration and intellectual development.
During my M.Phil. journey at Kathmandu University, I experienced a profound personal transformation and achieved notable professional growth. Embracing innovative teaching strategies, I contributed to the academic field through publications and disseminated knowledge to a broader audience. Additionally, my academic journey extended into teacher education and research, as I provided training and presented research papers at national and international conferences, contributing to the advancement of Nepal’s education system. This transformation has empowered me with the confidence to foster positive change and cultivate a passion for learning among future generations.
Summing up
My academic journey has been a transformative experience, catalyzed by the influence of my father’s dedication to education and selflessness. From the early years of learning at home to my pursuit of higher education at Kathmandu University, I have been intellectually and professionally empowered. By integrating innovative teaching methods and ICT in the language classroom, I have witnessed heightened student engagement and satisfaction. This journey has also enabled me to contribute actively to the field through my publications and knowledge-sharing endeavours with fellow educators. Supported by the unwavering belief of my family, friends, and students, I am determined to leverage the transformative power of education, creating a positive impact on the lives of students, and fostering progress within Nepal’s education landscape as I continue to evolve as an educator and researcher.
About the Author: Dammar Singh Saud is an assistant professor at Far Western University, Nepal. He holds an M.A. in English Literature and an M.Ed. in English Language Education. Currently pursuing an MPhil in English Language Education at Kathmandu University, his research interests include ELT Pedagogy, ICT in ELT, Teacher Professional Development, and Translanguaging.
On the very first day of my teaching career at Shree Bhairab Secondary School, Lamjung where I was appointed as a teacher of English in 1999, I found a book written by Vishnu Singh Rai in the school’s bookshelf. When reading his profile on the cover page, I wished I had had my name as Mr. Rai on the cover page of a textbook. But I had another important responsibility of pursuing Masters Degree and achieving it before starting any other works.
So far I remember the day I found a notice: “call for sample lessons to select grade eight textbook writers” in Gorkhapatra, a national daily newspaper from where my life of writer began. After reading the notice, I contacted my several friends, prepared required documents together and submitted them to Curriculum Development Centre, Sanothimi, Bhaktapur within the notice period. Fortunately, our team was selected to work for Curriculum Development Centre. I still feel how much I was excited to be a part of writers’ team.
We were given a time period of fifteen days to gather necessary materials to develop a textbook. In such a short timeframe, we had to work out of limited sources in rush. As a beginning to develop the textbook framework, the team scheduled a meeting to review national education policy, curriculum and previous textbooks, and in the meeting, the team decided to organize contents into each language skill: reading, writing, listening and speaking. Technically we planned to present contents into three sections based on the framework: Engage yourself-Study-Activate yourself. In the meeting, we distributed tasks of collecting materials to each of us in the team and agreed to meet with assigned works the following week.
Immediately after three weeks of our book development journey, our team briefed our ongoing activities and preparation of the textbook to Curriculum Development Centre. We provided our preliminary drafts of some lessons to CDC. It led us to a meeting with subject committee members in CDC. The committee’s feedback helped us develop a draft of the book. Ultimately we were able to submit our book draft on the 45th day of our book writing journey. Then, we developed a task force including school teachers, collected their feedback and made some changes in the draft of the textbook. The further meeting with subject committee members provided valuable feedback to improve the draft and we included some images and diagrams with their suggestion.
When the final draft was produced as a textbook, it was sent to one hundred government schools for piloting the project. The pilot project provided significant feedbacks and then the comments collected from the school teachers were reviewed subsequently. The feedbacks helped rectify errors in the textbook. Then the textbook was published as a final version and distributed throughout the country.
Main structure of the book
We structured the materials under ESA (Engage -study-activate) lesson sequence in the textbook. Engage activities are presented as motivational activities, study activities as main texts, and activate activities as real-life activities. Reading texts in the textbook provide with opportunities for developing various reading skills such as skimming and scanning, and vocabulary development. Practical activities set in the book provide the students with basic writing skills. Likewise, listening and speaking activities are entirely based on the communicative skills. We also expect that the students enhance grammatical competence through grammatical items presented in each unit. Some project works in the textbook drive teachers and students to field activities such as social events, environmental and community studies which may develop socialisation skills in the learners. Finally, to address the multiple intelligences of the students, fun activities are included in the textbook.
Personal experience in writing textbook
When I was selected and involved in the team of textbook writers, I got a load of priceless joys. Eventually, I started to dream to be a popular writer after being a part of a national level textbook. My dream to publish about my social, cultural and contexts were gradually happening to be actually concrete in real life. This opportunity reminded my teacher, Mr. Kalika Koirala, who encouraged me to study English and start teaching career. Since I became a member of writers’ team of the textbook, I have been popular among many people and my village has been recognised by many.
How I had thought in the beginning of starting to write the textbook did not go easily while gathering materials and working in the textbook. I thought 45 days would be enough for developing a draft of a textbook but actually, it was not. However, it was the allocated time for our team which was a pressure for everyone in the team. I have explained the major difficulties we faced when developing the book draft below:
Word choice: The guidelines for textbook writers had explicitly explained the maximum number of syllables in a word and the number of words in a sentence. We had to follow it strictly. This created problem while selecting the authentic reading texts. We had skipped many interesting texts due to the frequency of sentences consisting of more than twenty-two words and words consisting of many syllables. Therefore, there might not be more interesting reading texts in the book.
Framing the materials within the prescribed number of pages: As per the guidelines, we had to present all the materials within 176 pages. The areas to be addressed were really difficult to squeeze within the prescribed number of pages. To maintain it, we left many interesting texts. Therefore, we had to supply the book with short texts without the careful consideration of the interest of the students.
Searching for texts with prescribed language functions: There were particular language functions to be addressed in the textbook. While selecting the texts for different language functions and aspects, the texts had had at least some language exponents addressing the language functions prescribed in the curriculum. Finding such texts within a limited time was almost impossible. So we wrote some reading texts to address such problems.
Selecting the pictures and drawing in the textbook: When we submitted the draft copy within a given time frame, the textbook designer was handed over the document. The designer was assigned to supply the book with the pictures as per our description. We had no role in drawing pictures. Sometimes we changed the texts due to the lack of some pictures. In some cases, we changed the descriptions too. So we could not present the materials as we wished before.
However, being a textbook writer brought me both pleasure and pain. The pleasure relived the pain and generated more energy to be in the team of Grade 9 and 10 textbook writers. The first writing experience not only strengthened my writing skills but also taught me what the writer should consider while writing a textbook.
* The author is a Lecturer at Sanothimi Campus, Tribuwan University, Nepal and a textbook writer of English textbooks for grade VIII, IX and X (CDC).
I have been working in the mountainous regions for four years in the capacity of teacher trainer for REED (Rural Education and Environment Development Centre) Nepal. It is a national level non-governmental organization, primarily working in the field of teacher training in rural areas of the country for one and a half decade. The organization has been implementing whole school modality where all teachers gather at a venue. This year, I got an opportunity to coordinate a school-based teacher training program in Kharikhola of Solukhumbu district. This model is a new intervention of our organization and a new approach in Nepali context. In this brief essay, I discuss the steps of implementation and my observations toward the training model.
At the initial phase, we had an intensive discussion among teacher trainers, representatives from Ministry of Education (MoE), and experts from other parts of the world. The discussion highlighted the needs to focus on students’ progress through training rather than teachers’ attractive presentation in a simulated environment. The training has been divided into three phases: pre-training, while-training and post-training stages.
Pre-training stage (Preparation)
This is a preparation phase. In the first place, we invited a meeting of the head teachers from 17 schools in Kharikhola area. It was a very good discussion over the basic principles, processes and preparation for the training. I found myself excited as the head teachers were positive toward this model. Then, teachers from 17 schools were invited in three venues, the leader schools in the area. Therefore, the venues were the schools, not the teacher training centers nor were they resource centers. Teachers from two to three academic subjects attended at the assigned venues; other teachers continued teaching in their schools. In this regard, trainers worked with a small number of teachers at a time; it was all six times we worked in these three different venues. A teacher had to work at the venue for three days.
While Training Phase (Operational)
This phase is more collaborative in nature and a real operational phase. Once the teachers attended at the venue, they had to be present in the Morning Prayer with students. Then, they worked with trainers to prepare lesson plans for presentation. The lesson plans were based on learning outcomes specified by the curriculum and followed in Continuous Assessment System (CAS). All the lesson plans were done in terms of identified and analyzed needs. While developing the lesson plan, there was a good discussion among teachers and trainers over learning outcomes, teaching strategies and activities. The trainees also developed necessary teaching materials and set time for each activity of the lesson plan with the help of trainers and fellow trainees. Then, the trainers and teachers in each subject group went to the real classroom. One of the teachers led the lesson in the classroom and rest of them including trainer observed the classroom teaching. In some cases, they assisted teacher and students in various activities. During observation, students’ involvement and learning were the key elements to be considered. No matter how efficient and excellent lesson delivery took place, the key part of observation was to diagnose the learning of students. Mostly, students’ eagerness in learning, their participation in different activities, creativity and engagement in all sorts of learning processes were the major elements of observation in relation with the objectives set in the lesson plan.
Post Training Phase (Reflection)
The third phase was the reflective one. We discussed over the delivered lesson. Firstly, the teacher, who led the lesson, shared his/her feeling on the lesson. Then, every trainee was invited to put their views over the lesson on the basis of observation checklists. If the lesson objectives were not fulfilled, the lesson needed to go for revision, re-plan and deliver next day. Again, the revision went in collaboration with facilitator and fellow participants in some cases. In other cases, participants needed to plan for new lesson.
Major Characteristics
I was involved in this training program in all phases. In my observation, I have found five major features:
Training in real situation: We organized most of the face-to-face training programs and practised teaching skills in artificial settings in previous years. This time the training was organized in a natural situation i.e. in the real classroom. Teachers and trainers got opportunity to work in schools with students.
Focus on students’ progress: How teachers presented lesson does matter little but what learning outcome was seen on students is a major focus of this school-based teacher training model.
Lesson plan: Trainees worked on lesson plans instead of session plans.
Collaborative: The model is highly collaborative in nature as trainees received a lot of opportunities to work and collaborate with fellow trainees and trainers in different phases of the training.
Focus on local context: It is obvious that facilitators and participants work in a specific context in this training model so that it could be more effective and teaching skills are transferable. Sometimes, training received in a different context may not be applicable in other contexts.
Conclusion
The school-based teacher training model we implemented is definitely time consuming than previous face-to-face model. It took twelve days to cover a six-day previous training model. However, the model provided an ample opportunity to teachers to improve their teaching. It is participatory and student-centred as it involved students within the framework. In addition, the training was more economic in terms of money we expended there than previous models. Therefore, school-based teacher training approach could be replicated in other contexts. However, further researches need to be carried out in its theoretical and practical aspects.
Mr. Koirala is an MA in English and an LLB from Tribhuvan University. He has been working in the capacity of a senior teacher trainer of English for REED Nepal. His area of interest also includes writing, theatre performance and art.
English as a medium of instruction (EMI) has been a burning issue in community schools in Nepal these days. Nepali language has been the medium of instruction for the academic subjects like mathematics, science, social studies and so on. Although English is said to be taught in the same language, it is also not found to be fully implemented. In this backdrop, some community schools in Nepal have initiated the practice of EMI for teaching-learning. To support and enhance EMI, NCED has recently launched a project called National Initiative to Improve Teaching in English , known as Project NIITE. The project has made many teachers, academicians and administrators aware of implementing EMI in classrooms. Yet, some regard that content knowledge that students learn is more important than the medium of its delivery.
After the completion of secondary or higher secondary school education, students have to face colleges and universities in English medium. Those students, who want to go abroad for further study need to sit for English language tests like IELTS, TOEFL, SAT and GRE. This is when they realize the importance of English language and feel inferior before their competitors. Students with higher academic scores also cannot meet the entry requirement in language tests and get deprived of international academic opportunities. It is not the knowledge that stops them from such opportunities but the language.
On the other hand, students from English medium private schools find these tests easier in comparison to the students from community schools. The textbooks of community schools do not go any changes and revisions for long, whereas they are modified each year with up- to- date information in private schools.
The policy of the government has given freedom to schools to use either Nepali or English as a medium of instruction. Basically, private boarding schools practice EMI and government public schools use Nepali language. They use Nepali language to teach subjects like English, mathematics, science and social studies. They have limited resources and the teachers ignore their everyday tasks before, while and after they are in their classrooms. The students, though they learn English language from primary level cannot communicate in English and they do not easily comprehend the texts they use. The students and most of the teachers in primary level do not have good command over English language. But many public schools have started introducing English language as a medium of instruction. This has made EMI training to public school teachers a must.
The recently launched project i.e. Project NIITE by NCED with support from British Council has a main objective to enable primary level teachers from all over the nation to use English as a medium of instruction. The EMI training also follows the same modality of TPD training of NCED except for its focus on developing English language proficiency to deliver classes in English language.
The developing craze for English language among students and parents brought most of the students from community schools to private boarding schools. The number of students in public schools has been decreasing gradually in Nepal. According to the latest data, 417 public schools were merged because of having less students than supposed to be. It has also shown the importance of English language and its craze in a developing country like Nepal. It is because of this, most of the community schools not only decided to shift the medium of instruction but also managed school uniform that look similar to English medium private schools. However, implementing EMI has not become comfortable for teachers and the students at once. Therefore, the government decided to run EMI training for primary level teachers as EMI begins from primary.
In Primary level, students cannot understand and use English properly. The teachers know English but they have not used it as a medium of instruction. As they have been using Nepali language, which has lowered their confidence in using English language. The teachers are hesitant to communicate among themselves and in the classrooms. Now, EMI training supports primary school teachers to use English in a simple and clear way. It teaches them how to maximize students’ participation and minimize teachers talking time in class. EMI gives them skills to maximize students talking time and minimize teachers talking time. It helps them better understand that the role of a teacher in classroom is to demonstrate, give clear instructions and engage all students through pair work, small group work or whole class activities. In my experience as a teacher trainer in Nawalparasi and Gulmi districts of Nepal, the EMI training was much favored by the primary level teachers and they looked very much excited after six-days training was over. From the third day onwards, they communicated among themselves in English and used English language to talk with the trainers. The trainee teachers learnt how to use English rhymes and language games in classroom. They learnt to make useful classroom materials and became eager to go to school and implement what they had learnt in the raining. In the last two days of the first phase of the EMI training, they were also involved in a short micro teaching. This micro teaching and the feedback from fellow teachers and the trainers made them confident in six days.
EMI training under Project NIITE lasts at least for three years and a master trainer from NCED and one from British Council work together to train teachers effectively. This project has its own training manual having 12 main units and many sub units under them. EMI covers all the subjects except Nepali. This training mainly focuses on how to give clear, short and simple instruction to the students in English. It focuses on learner-centered classroom where students take active participation in classroom activities. The training focuses on the use of English language as a means of communication between teacher and students, and students and students. EMI focuses on the use of four skills in every class. After the completion of EMI training, the trained teachers can use English as a medium of instruction, plan their own lessons, prepare teaching materials, train other teachers and become more creative.
A good lesson plan with specific objectives, teaching materials, time management of a teacher in classroom, use of classroom language by teacher and students, and the use of language skills are the highlights of EMI training. In the same way, involvement of students in learning activities such as a pair work, small group and whole class work, feedback and error correction, better monitoring, building good rapport between students -students and students -teacher and reflection are also the contents of EMI training. The main focus of the training is the use of classroom language, language for instruction, and evaluation. EMI also focuses on child friendly, anti- racist and gender equality in classroom.
The schools which are willing to shift their medium of instruction must provide EMI training to their teachers so that it equips them with skills to teach subjects like English, mathematics, social studies and science through EMI. This is a pilot project in Nepal aiming to provide training to seven thousand basic level teachers in the country within three years.
Some people think that it makes no difference whether schools use English or Nepali as a medium of instruction but what matters most is the transfer of content knowledge. This is is right but EMI is a demand of school teachers in community schools to stop the huge transfer of students to private English medium schools. EMI is not against using mother language in classroom. It does not promote ‘only-English’ policy in classrooms. However, a teacher can use mother language to help students comprehend the texts and contexts.
Finally, under the project NIITE, EMI training is aiming to make teaching-learning effective basically in primary level in Nepal. The increasing curiosity among teachers regarding EMI training, and their motivation and active participation during the first phase of training has made us optimistic of its upcoming success. It seems to me that, EMI will surely help community schools to minimize the gap noticed in education between private schools and community schools.
—
The author is Master Trainer (Project NIITE) British Council, Nepal.
Since the day I joined M.Ed. ELT program, it was my dream to be an ELT trainer and fortunately for me, it came true recently. As a part of Teacher’s Development course, I conducted training sessions in Janakpur and Tanahun in July and although it was my first experience of delivering training, I gained tremendous knowledge and experience. I experienced that conducting a teacher training session is a very challenging job where a trainer has to manage everything for the sake of in-service teachers’ satisfaction. In this article, I am very glad to share my experience.
I had heard about ELT teachers’ training before getting enrolled in Kathmandu University but when I got an opportunity to be a part of the ELT program here, I learnt many things related to English language teaching, learning and training. I neither had experience of a trainer nor a trainee but once when I got a chance to attend an in-service teacher training delivered by our seniors, I got many ideas about the teacher training and started dreaming to be a trainer. And at the same time, I became more interested in teaching and learning English as a foreign language.
NeltaChoutari organized a workshop titled Behind Academic Publishing: Why, How and What at King’s College, Babar Mahal in Kathmandu on June 28, 2014.
Bal Krishna Sharma, a founder of NeltaChoutari and a Ph. D. scholar at the University of Hawaii at Manoa, USA, facilitated the one-day workshop, attended by over 30 emerging authors, especially English teachers and students from Kathmandu University and Tribhuvan University. Continue reading Choutari Workshop: Photo Blog→
The 19th International Conference of NELTA (Phase II) began on March 3, 2014 in Hetauda.
One of the key speakers, Prof Stephen Stoynoff (US) presented on the theme: Language Assessment and the path to Crystal Mountain. Using the metaphor of a trek through the Himalayan Mountains, the speaker considered the paradigm shift that has occurred in language assessment over the past few decades and its implications for EFL teachers. He emphasized psychometric and socio-cultural perspectives on assessment. Prof. Stoynoff further presented “Classroom based Language Assessment: Improving the Design and Use of Teacher Developed Assessments” during plenary session. He reviewed key trends in language assessment and their complications for teacher constructed assessments of second language ability.
Prof. Keith Morrow (UK) presented on “What does ‘authentic’ assessment mean? How do we do it?” His talked about genuineness and authenticity while focusing on assessment, testing observation, self assessment and individual growth over time. His plenary session proceeded with awareness and activity in ELT. The primary focus was on learners and teachers who need to strengthen awareness and what they could learn from it.
Prof. Z.N. Patil (India) mainly focused on assessment as an integral part of ELT through story telling techniques. He stressed on day to day assessment in teaching by citing some relevant examples of poems and dramas. In the presentation “Enriching Linguistic, Communicative and Pragmatic Competence through Literature”, he presented audio- visual text and interacted with the participants and gave specific procedures to be adopted in classroom activities.
Mr. Brenden Mcsharry (British Council) presented on “21st Century Learning Skills and Assessment: the Implication for Nepal” stressing on thinking skills, working skills, working tools and living skills. Besides, he focused on 21st century themes like global citizenship, human rights, intercultural awareness, equality and diverse, healthy living and peace studies.
Laxman Gnawali and his team of Kathmandu University presented “Pechha Kuchha Fun Show” to all the participants that ultimately focused on insightful learning with innovative ideas.
Apart from the key presenters, there were around thirty presentations from different ELT practitioners from nation and abroad as well for two days. Around 450 English teachers actively took participation in different concurrent session according to their field of interest.
Do English teachers still need dictionaries, especially printed dictionaries? Because internet gives access to the online form of most of the monolingual and some bilingual dictionaries, do English teachers need to buy and ask students to buy dictionaries? Dictionaries are usually bulky and voluminous, so should we ask students not to buy them, but rather suggest them to use mobile or web dictionaries? This write-up will attempt to answer these questions in relation to the talk given by Dr. Elaine Higgleton, in the 19th International Conference, L.A. School, Hattiban, Lalitpur.
Dr. Higgleton, who is one of the chief editors of Collins Advanced Learners’ Dictionary, focused on the importance of dictionary and significance of their use in this age of digital media. She started her talk presenting an account of how the buying of printed dictionaries has declined over the decade from around 250,000 to 35,000 copies annually. She attributes the reason to the easy availability of large free online dictionaries. Having talked about the history of dictionaries, in which she concluded that the notion of dictionary is always changing based on the perceived needs of the users and the intention of the compiler, she went on to say that the online dictionaries complement the print versions of them. Most of the online dictionaries, according to Dr. Higgleton, are traditional in form and are not user friendly. Hence, learners of English as a foreign language might find it very hard to use online dictionaries and make a sense out of them. Yet, on the other hand, millions of hits have been recorded by different online dictionaries web pages, and it is reported that people seem to be contented with what they get from those online dictionaries.
Moreover, learner’s dictionaries also provide free access to their online dictionaries. Most of these dictionaries do serve purpose as they can aid learners in their effort to learn spelling, hear spelling or check grammar. Nonetheless, Dr. Higgleton claimed we should encourage learners to buy dictionaries because most printed dictionaries offer “more bespoke and tailored content” for users having special needs. Secondly, printed dictionaries are user friendly given that we do not need to depend upon lights of internet connectivity to use them. Thirdly, they can be carried to the classroom and used as per the requirement. Also, she stressed that the lexis chain that the dictionaries provide can be useful in creating other vocabulary related activities. Next, the printed dictionaries can be used in creating grammar exercise to simple writing exercise. And, they also aid learners if they would like to score higher in English examination. Lastly, she added that bespoke and tailored designed traditional dictionaries address the specific content needs of learner most of which are driven by their context and L1.
In line with the arguments of Dr. Higgleton, I as a teacher and learner of English feel that dictionaries have a high significance in the successful learning of English. Reflecting back to my language learning experience, I can vividly remember that I used to have oxford dictionary placed near to my bed while I sat on my bed to read. I can recall noting down words, in class while teaching or while attending university classes, to find their meaning and the usage in the dictionary. I have used dictionaries for multiple purposes. I have used them to decide whether I should use one word over another; whether I should use a particular preposition or conjunction after the given words; to find out how a particular word is used in sentence.
One of my fond memories related to the use of dictionary goes back to the first year of my teaching career, when I bought a dictionary and a self-help grammar book to brush my English language with the first salary that I received. Obviously, dictionary alone does not help, but having one may aid language learning task. I used that dictionary for reasons mentioned above. Since then, I have bought multiple copies of dictionaries. I feel that buying dictionaries is an investment, which worth it.
Hence, I conclude that yes we still need dictionaries, and we should encourage our learners to buy printed dictionaries. We can do multiple, language related activities in class if all our learners bring their dictionaries. Further, we can also request the school/college administration to buy newer version of dictionaries. Because, language is dynamic and so are the needs of learners, the newer versions can address those needs.
—-
Suman Laudari
Adjunct Faculty at Kathmandu University, School of Education
Lecturer at Ace Institute of Management, Baneshwor.
On February 23, 2014, I attended a one-day workshop on ‘Language Testing and Assessment’ conducted by NELTA in association with the American Embassy at Kathmandu University, School of Education. The workshop was facilitated by Dr. Stephen J. Stoynoff from Minnesota State University Mankato USA, one of the key note speakers for the 19th International Conference for NELTA.
It was a very lively session by Dr. Stoynoff as he presented on how learners who learn English as the second or third language struggle in learning the language in the classroom. He shared an example of his own friend, Mr. Carlos who had immigrated to America from Nicaragua in 1950s. He belonged to a Spanish speaking community and was already 14 when he joined a school in Texas, US. It was difficult for him to learn and adjust in the classroom with his peers who were much younger by age and he did not know English either. As a result, he could not succeed in his sixth grade and he had to repeat the same grade. As English was not his first language, it was obviously difficult for him to understand what the teachers taught in English medium that followed “sink-or-swim” model.
Dr. Stoynoff asked all the trainees to find out the factors that influenced language development and reasons for Carlos’s failure in grade six. The discussion ended with findings of the factors like home environment, societal environment and individual factors of language learners influence the language development. A learner learns language if the educational level of the family is higher. The families which give priority to learn different languages helps a child to values towards education is also important for the development in a learner. It was amazing to find that Carlos earned a PhD later, though he had tough time in school in the early years of migration. The turning point in his life was at his school where a teacher appreciated his work in Spanish. Those inspiring words from the teacher guided him to choose Spanish for his further education and he earned a PhD in the same area. Now he is regarded one of the important experts in the field of Second Language Learning and Teaching.
It can be inferred from the story of Carlos that a teacher can inspire students to pursue their career in proper field of education and the motivating environment of the family also contributes in effective learning of languages. The interaction of the factors like home environment, societal environment and individual factors of age, proficiency of the first language, attitudes towards the second language and access to the Second Language and culture affects the rate of second language development of the learners. The first session ended with one open topic to debate on the pros and cons of teaching other languages than first language at early age of learning.
The second session of the workshop focused on the current trends in the field of Language Testing and Assessment. Assessment is a process based activity to ensure that a learner is developing his/her learning that continues throughout the daily classroom activities. The trainees were divided in groups to make a student profile having some questions to check the background of students in academics performance and to design the learning environment on the bases of it to expect possible development in the pursuit of the course.
Dr. Stoynoff shared the current practices of Language Testing and Assessment in the USA and some other countries. The trainees were asked to make comparisons between the classroom tests and the standard tests (high stakes tests). The discussion gave us idea about the types of testing in classrooms and beyond classrooms in terms of their procedure of conduction.
Nepal has been following the decade-long practiced assessments and tests in all levels of education from nursery to university level for different purposes whereas the other countries have updated their testing mechanism to enhance the ability and strength of the learners. But there is no such standard test for Nepal to check the ability of Nepalese students. We came to realize that there is enough space for ELT practitioners and language experts for research in Nepal to design a standard test to check the ability of our students in Nepal vis-à-vis the students of other countries.
The one-day workshop was an eye opening program for the participants where we got to know the recent trends of language testing and assessment. I, on the behalf of all trainees would like to thank NELTA President Mr. Hemanta Raj Dahal and Ms. Sara Denne-Bolton, Regional English Language Officer (RELO) from Embassy of the USA for providing such an opportunity to discover our strengths as teachers of English language and find our students’ potentialities in learning second language comfortably.
Photos: Umes Shrestha
—
Ganesh Datt Bhatt Life Member-NELTA Kanchanpur
HimalayanWhiteHouseInternationalCollege, Kathmandu
Email: yrsgdbhatt@gmail.com
We not only use language for daily communication; we also use language to express our identities and cultures and to represent our lifestyles and communities. So, as we all know, the loss of language is loss of both culture and identity of the community speaking the language. Because communities that lose their languages–and thereby their culture, identity, and pride–also lose their status and confidence in society, the process of language loss often leads to broader and adverse social consequences such as marginalization, poverty and poor health, social evils such as drug abuse, and so on. Hence, it is important to preserve languages in the world, especially the languages of the minority groups.
Those who are ignorant about the value of language diversity tend to believe that communities that adopt a more dominant/mainstream language “gain” new power and opportunity; they even go to the extent of arguing that linguistic minorities shed the burden of multiple languages when they leave behind their local languages. The truth about multilingualism, however, makes such understanding absurd. Language is the key to engagement and therefore to sustainable development. The World Bank Research Report titled “Assessing Aid: What Works, What Doesn’t, and Why” (1998) showed that development initiatives that sought beneficiaries’ involvement achieved 68 percent success, while those that did not achieved a success rate of just 10 percent. Engaging with the beneficiaries needs the use of their local languages. Such a linguistic and cultural immersion with the target communities contributes to establish two-way communication for people’s meaningful participation and to adopt bottom up approaches in order to achieve sustainable results. Trying to supplant local languages with outside language (whether that is done for efficiency or in the name of “empowering” local communities) is like trying to make one’s neighborhood greener by cutting down existing trees and planting new ones–or worse.
Language is the key to inclusion and inclusion is a must for democracy. For instance, Nepal being a multiethnic and multilingual country will become a true democratic nation when it fully overcomes more than 250 years legacy of linguistic and cultural discrimination against indigenous and minority groups. It is only possible when children of minority groups are provided with the access to education in their mother tongues. Promoting multilingual education in the country–where minority language communities can build upon their local linguistic, cultural, and knowledge resources even as they learn new languages–is a roadmap for true democracy.
In particular, the promotion of local languages is the key to effective education. Education is a basic human right in international law, widely accepted by governments throughout the world, and language is a medium of instruction as well as a subject matter to achieve the basic human right of expression and self-realization.
MLE Conference in Bangkok
Insights like the above brought together hundreds of educators, linguists, government and civil society delegates and development workers from the Asia Pacific region and beyond at the fourth international conference on language and education recently convened by the consortium of organizations ‘Multilingual Education Working Group (MLE WG)’ in Bangkok, Thailand from Nov 6 to 8, 2013.
Representing a development activist and educationist from Nepal interested in MLE, I attended the conference on the theme ‘Multilingual Education for All in Asia and the Pacific: Policies, Practices and Processes’. The theme was very relevant as it provided a common platform to adopt a common understanding of MLE and its importance in Asian context. This conference did showcase promising practices so as to increase understanding of the importance of expanding access to effective MLE and strengthen the momentum for this issue in the AsiaPacific region. The event did not only determined the factors that enable effective, efficient and sustainable MLE by sharing challenges and lessons learned from current MLE practice but also identified recent policy developments in the Asia-Pacific region. The researches and papers presented in the conference revealed that the role of MLE network and collaboration with the governments, non-government organizations, universities and language association played a significant role in making the government formulate and revise education policies in respective countries and putting the MLE practice into action at schools.
Towards Multilingual Education in Nepal
The research studies and papers on policies and practices towards multilingual education in Nepal occupied a substantial space in the conference. Altogether eight different research studies and papers were presented by Nepalese MLE practitioners, academician and NGO activists. Director General Dr. Lava D. Awasthi from Department of Education, Nepal and profound linguist Prof. Dr. Yogendra Prasad Yadava from Tribhuvan University, Nepal talked on multilingual education in terms of policy manifestations and pedagogical practices in Nepal and MLE policies and practices in Nepal as an appraisal respectively. Both the papers showed the variations, challenges and gaps in MLE practices introduced by Government of Nepal as well as national and international agencies in the country.
Even though Nepal is a multilingual and multiethnic country with 123 languages and more than 103 ethnic communities, children in most ethnolinguistic communities are deprived of basic education in their respective mother tongues. Teaching in unfamiliar languages has hindered cognitive development in the children. Language not only helps promote equality and empowers people but also is a key factor for the social inclusion in ethno-linguistic communities. MTB-MLE is the most important mechanism for achieving the goal of education for all among minority communities. However, the policy adopted by the government is not conducive for such a purpose. Curriculum and textbooks as well as reading materials are not compatible to the socio-cultural setting of the communities. Making these arguments in her paper, Dr. Ambika Regmi from Tribhuvan University concluded her sharing claiming that only appropriate strategies can access to MTB-MLE be guaranteed in all ethno-linguistic communities of Nepal.
Reviewing the education policies addressing minority language use in basic education in Nepal, Pushker Kadel, director of Language Development Centre, an NGO shared the impact on the community, students and teachers of pilot MLE programs initiated by Department of Education in eight languages and MLE projects initiated by I/NGOs. Blending his own experience of MLE initiatives taken by local NGOs and the reported outcomes of the existing MLE projects, kadel made recommendations for effective MLE practices in Nepal.
(NNLPI) an NGO and Kimiko Abe from Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL) Nepal presented a case study of a multilingual education (MLE) program implemented in the Rajbanshi speaking areas of Jhapa and Morang in southeast Nepal. This case study showed how a quality MLE program can provide efficiency, effectiveness, and sustainability of education for students who speak non-dominant languages. The case study also illustrated that high quality program can persuade local governments of the value of providing education in the students’ strongest language, creating a sustainable policy and funding environment for MLE program. The three key factors that made the Rajbanshi program successful included community involvement as implementers of the program, child-friendly teaching methods and environment and capacity building and professional development support to the teachers.
Similarly, undertaking another case study of a Rajbanshi medium school in Jhapa of eastern Nepal, Surya Prasad Yadav from Tribhuvan University Nepal shared MLE practices in Nepal through his paper. The findings of his studies showed that children from Rajbanshi-medium school are more motivated towards education and are more regular in class attendance. Owing to the use of the mother tongue, the rate of their dropouts has decreased and there has been a reduction in the number of out-of-school children. Finally, he discussed the ways to address the challenges of MLE practices in that case and further claimed that such a case could be replica for other similar schools in the country.
MLE: A Case of Rana Tharu
The Rana Tharu language spoken by Rana Tharu community, indigenous inhabitants of Kailali and Kanchanpur districts from far western Nepal, is gradually being lost due to dominant language Nepali, which is only medium of instruction used in schools and literacy class. Children from such community face difficulties in education due to Nepali and English being the medium of government and private schools respectively. Literary rate of the community is lower than that of Nepali-speaking communities. Presenting the above linguistic contexts, Prithivi Chaudhary from Transformation Nepal, an NGO shared another case of MLE practice from Rana Tharu Community, which showed a perspective on language development for the sustainable use of Rana Tharu in schools and literacy classes. The findings carried out from a linguistic survey utilizing participatory tools, informal interviews and observations conducted in Kailali and Kanchanpur in 2012 show that Rana Tharu community lacks access to education, particularly in the mother tongue and lags far behind other Nepali communities in awareness, development and technology.
MLE for Adult Literacy in Nepal: A Case of Lhomi
Literacy programs in rural Nepal are quite common, but practitioners often experience low literacy rates among these rural communities. One difficulty related to literacy programs in Nepal is that many people do not speak Nepali as their first language, but literacy programs are required to teach literacy in Nepali. However, the joint presentation by Yee-may Chan fromSIL Nepal and Chhejap Bhote fromNepal Lhomi Society (NELHOS), an NGO strongly argued that literacy programs are allowed to teach literacy in another language, as long as literacy in Nepali is included at some point. Their paper explained how the Lhomi Mother Tongue-based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE) Adult Literacy program applied principles from MLE programs designed for children to literacy programs for adults. For instance, culturally appropriate mother tongue teaching materials relevant to the participants’ daily lives were created and used; teaching materials used in the classrooms moved from simple to complicated, from known to unknown; the participants’ mother tongue was the medium of instruction. The experience of the program showed that participants mastered basic literacy, numeracy skills, and simple mathematics within five months. Their experience further showed that after participants learned to read in Lhomi, they quickly learned to read Nepali (which uses a similar writing system). Some participants went even further, learning English, which uses a different writing system. The Lhomi program has demonstrated that best practices of language acquisition for children can be relevant for teaching adults as well, a finding that makes the local community, funding partners, and government authorities satisfied.
Alternative models of MTB-MLE for multilingual classrooms in Nepal
The language composition of the local communities in Nepal shows that most of the schools are linguistically diverse, with the presence of two or more languages. And, the mother tongue-based multilingual education (MTB-MLE) program with a single mother tongue as medium of instruction fails to ensure equal access to quality education and linguistic rights for all students. Effective implementation of a MTB-MLE program depends on the appropriateness of the model in each school environment. Some innovative strategies have emerged in the multilingual classrooms from the continuous interaction between the principles of MTB-MLE and classroom language situations during the initial phase of program implementation. These strategies shared by Laxman Ghimire from Tribhuvan University, Nepal include development of multilingual textbooks, preparing multilingual teachers and allocation of school hours for each language in the classroom. His sharing added another insight that some other strategies were employed informally, such as policy negotiation and reformulation in the local context. Although these strategies have been emerged in the local context, it can be crucial for the development of an appropriate model of MTB-MLE in the linguistic and sociolinguistic context of Nepal.
Conclusion
Education acquired through mother tongue alongside other languages, which is termed as multilingual education (MLE), is stable, that it greatly bolsters children’s cognitive development, and that it prepares them to face the challenges of real life through education in much more effective ways. The practice of MLE has shown that it is very useful for addressing global educational challenges like low participation and high dropout rates. The studies have already shown that use of mother tongue has powerful pedagogical and social justifications. Recognizing the profound importance of language for education and development, British Council has recently changed its position to English language teaching with a multilingual framework.
Nepal, where about ten dozen languages are spoken as mother tongue can serve both as opportunities, and by virtue of it being a developing nation with limited resources and sticky political problems, as challenges for the implementation of MLE. Despite of linguistic diversity, Nepali is the sole official language used as the medium of instruction in primary education throughout the country. However, there have been recent initiatives on multilingual education in Nepal’s primary and adult education. The MLE policy is enshrined in the various constitutional and legal provisions in Nepal in relation to MLE-related international laws and human rights obligations. Nepal has recently shifted the monolingual ideologies and established linkage between Nepal’s MLE policies, plans, programs, and interventions and their manifestations in schools. MLE piloting and local-level initiatives have significantly contributed to developing models for MLE expansion and mother tongue based pedagogies in different languages with the focus on creating indigenized materials, setting strategies and processes, and identifying good practices that have shown visible results in multilingual classroom settings.
In the context where community schools are shifting their medium to English from Nepali languages and guardian’s growing tendency of sending their children to English medium private schools, there are a lot of challenges of multilingual education in Nepal. However, the replica of best MLE practices along with local linguistic and cultural immersion, substantial awareness and advocacy at grassroots level and extensive MLE intervention for basic education and literacy class followed by proper joint monitoring by concerned GOs and I/NGOs could be the ways for effective MLE in Nepal.
Acknowledgements: I am grateful to Mahidol University, Thailand and Multilingual Education Working Group (MLE WG) for providing me the scholarship to attend the international conference in Bangkok. I am equally thankful to Plan Nepal for creating conducive environment to attend the event.
Writing creatively is a joyful component of learning a language in real life. Creativity, as creative writers have tasted, adds flavor to writing. Many more language teachers might have a rigid mindset because of having had to be bound to the framework provided by syllabi, textbooks, exams, etc. Anyway, they can be hopeful for the change they really wish by introducing at least some elements of creativity in their teaching.
There are a number of general points which will help make implementing creative writing activities more likely to succeed:
Try to establish a relaxed, non-judgmental atmosphere, where your students feel confident enough to let go and not to worry that their every move is being scrutinized for errors.
Ensure that the students’ work is ‘published’ in some way. This could be by simply keeping a large notice-board for displaying the students’ work. Other ways would include giving students a project for publishing work in a simple ring binder, or as part of a class magazine. Almost certainly, there will be students able and willing to set up a class website where work can be published. Performances, where students read or perform their work for other classes or even the whole school, are another way of making public what they have done.
Encourage students to discuss their work together in a frank but friendly manner. We get good ideas by bouncing them off other people. Help them establish an atmosphere where criticism is possible without causing offence.
Explain regularly how important accurate observation is, and encourage ‘noticing’ things. They also need to be encouraged to be curious and to follow up with ‘research’ – looking for more information, whether in books, on the Internet or by asking people.
Make it clear that what they do in the classroom is only the tip of the iceberg. To get real benefit from these activities, they need to do a lot of work outside class hours. Most of what we learn, we do not learn in class. You can capitalize on that fact.
Do the activities regularly in order to get the best effects. Maybe once a week is a sensible frequency. If you leave too long between sessions, you have to keep going back to square one. That is a waste of time and energy.
The following are simply a sample of some possible activities:
Hello/Goodbye poems
Tell the class that they are going to write a poem. It will have only two lines, and each line will have just two words. The first line will start with ‘Hello’, the second with ‘Goodbye’.
Give students one or two examples:
Hello sunshine,
Goodbye rain.
Hello smoking,
Goodbye health.
Hello paper,
Goodbye trees.
Then, ask if they can think of any new ones. Note them on the board.
Ask students to work in pairs (or alone if they prefer), and try to come up with at least two new poems. Allow 10 minutes for this task.
Ask for their examples and put them on the board. Ask students to give feedback on each other’s examples.
Collect all the poems. Display them on the class notice-board or upload them onto the class/school website.
The activity is very simple yet it does require students to call on their vocabulary store and to think about words that have a mutual or reciprocal relationship of meanings (smoking/health etc.) If you prefer, this can be used as a short warm-up for other activities.
Stem poems
Explain to students that they will be writing some lines that will fit together into a poem. Then, write up the stem you intend to use. For example: I wish I could…
Elaborate further by eliciting samples of completed sentences, as in these examples:
I wish I could have an ice cream.
I wish I could speak French.
I wish I could visit Australia.
Then, ask each student to write three sentences following the same pattern.
After about 10 minutes, ask students to work in groups of four and to share their sentences. They should choose six sentences that they think are most interesting and then decide what order to put them in to form a 6-line poem. There is no need for the poems to rhyme but if they do, fine. Lastly, tell them to add one final line, which is: But I can’t.
Ask groups to read their poems aloud to the class. Can they suggest any ways to improve the poems?
Collect all the poems. Display them on the class noticeboard or upload them onto the class/school website.
You can decide on other stems to use in subsequent classes. For example:
Loneliness is…
I used to… but now…
I love the way…
Nobody knows…
Who knows…?
I don’t know why…
It would be a good idea to choose stems that give practice in language points you are working on with the class at that time.
Acrostics
An acrostic poem is based on a word written vertically. The letters then each form the first letter of a word, and all the words are related to the meaning of the original word. For example:
Docile
Obedient
Growling
Explain what an acrostic is and write up one or two examples on the board. Then, ask them to write an acrostic based on their own name or the name of someone they know well. The words they choose should somehow describe the person. For example, Vuthy:
V Very
U Unlikely
T To
H Help
Y You
Collect all the poems. Display them on the class notice-board or upload them onto the class/school website.
Ask students to write at least one more acrostic before the next class. This time, they can choose any word they like (it doesn’t have to be someone’s name). For example:
Lying
Everywhere –
Autumn
Falling.
Acrostics involve a kind of mental gymnastics that engages students in reactivating their vocabulary in an unusual way. Acrostics do not usually produce great poetry but they certainly exercise the linguistic imagination.
Acknowledgement: Some of the ideas were developed by Tan Bee Tin.
If you were …
First you make copies of this outline:
If I were a fruit, I would be ….
If I were a vegetable, I would be…
If I were a tree, I would be…
If I were a flower, I would be…
If I were a fish, I would be…
If I were a bird, I would be…
If I were a book, I would be…
If I were a song, I would be…
If I were the weather, I would be…
If I were a season, I would be…
Then distribute the sheets that you have prepared. Ask students to work individually for about 10 minutes, completing the outline of the poem with words they prefer. For example: If I were a fruit, I would be a grape.
Let students share what they have written in groups of four. Then conduct a class discussion and go through the poems line-by-line, asking for examples of what they have written.
Ask students to think of someone they like and to write the person’s name as the title of their poem. They then write a 12-line poem addressed to that person using the following format:
Line 1: describe the person as a kind of food.
Line 2: describe the person as weather
Line 3: describe the person as a tree
Line 4: describe the person as a time of day
Line 5: describe the person as some kind of transport
Line 6: describe the person as an article of clothing
Line 7: describe the person as part of a house
Line 8: describe the person as a flower
Line 9: describe the person as a kind of music/a sound
Line 10: describe the person as something to do with colour
Line 11: describe the person as an animal
The last line should be the same for everyone: ‘You are my friend’.
So, their poem would look something like this:
For Sharifa
You are mango ice-cream
You are a cool breeze on a hot day
You are a shady coconut palm
You are dawn
You are a sailing boat crossing the bay
You are my comfortable sandals
You are the sunny verandah
You are jasmine
You are a soft gamelan
You are light blue
You are a playful kitten
You are my friend.
Metaphor poems
Make copies of this list of words and phrases for use during the class:
Love an egg Hate a tooth brush Disappointment a vacuum cleaner Marriage a spoon Friendship a knife Hope a mirror Life a window Work a cup Time a banana
Check that students know what a metaphor is – a form of direct comparison between two things. Give examples of metaphors in everyday life:
A blade of grass
A sharp frost
Spending time
Save time
Opening up a can of worms
She’s a snake in the grass
He clammed up
He shelled out
A wall of silence
In fact, everyday language is so full of metaphorical expressions that we hardly notice them. They have become an accepted way of speaking. Explain that poets make great use of metaphor to make their words more vivid and easier to visualise.
Hand out the sheets. Tell students to write three metaphors by combining one item on the left with another on the right (students will have to join the words using ‘is’). They should not spend time thinking about the combinations. For example:
Life is a window.
Friendship is a knife.
Love is a vacuum cleaner.
Marriage is a banana
Hate is a mirror.
Now, ask them to choose just one of their new metaphors. They should now write two more lines after the metaphor to explain what it means. For example:
Marriage is a banana:
when you’ve eaten the fruit,
only the skin is left.
Hate is a mirror:
it reflects back
on the one who hates.
Tell students not to use ‘because’ as it is unnecessary, and to keep the lines short.
Ask students to share their metaphor poems with the class. Students should then make an illustrated display of their work. Acknowledgement: This idea is adapted from Jane Spiro’s brilliant book, Creative Poetry Writing (OUP)
Now we can have a good start to enjoy learning some ‘real’ language. Creative writing promotes self-motivation and makes language teaching and learning effortless. You are always curious to find out something and encounter new things and learn them willingly. How interesting this can be! Good luck and happy writing!
How can we motivate our students to be excited about their classes? One way is to tell them stories. Another way is to ask them to write stories.
Stories educate, enrich, and entertain everyone. Find easy stories in English. But for now, I will whet your appetite by sending you two of the stories that will be published in the forthcoming book of stories called “Untold Tales” written by English ACCESS Microscholarship Students in Nepal, These are the stories that they wrote at the winter camp in 2013 in Pokhara.
These anecdotes and tales of exprience provide an enjoyable opportunity to increase vocabulary, reading comprehension, listening and speaking and, ultimately, writing. The stories and exercises together are a whole-language anthology designed to improve communication skills. These stories include exercises that employ the cooperative/collaborative learning philosophy and address multiple learning styles.
Using stories is a magical way to teach, effective at any age. Here’s a summary of how stories aid language-learning:
provide motivation for reading
heighten listening skills
develop speaking skills
use cooperative learning strategies
foster creative language growth
provide content-based material
Serve as model for further writing
All learners, from babies to grandmothers, learn better with stories; they are energizers. Integrating stories as an adjunct to the teacher’s repertoire in the classroom setting is not only simple, but makes perfect sense. We hope you use these stories to open new worlds of content and learning possibilities. We also hope they serve as a springboard to motivating your own students to write stories.
Enjoy the stories. If you want some more, write to me at “myrtis101@mac.com” and I will send you more. These two are from Kathmandu and Gorkha, but I have many others, some from Butwal and Birgunj.
My Story
One early morning, on my way to temple, I saw sparkling eyes in ragged clothes. I saw their creative hands and bright smiles. These children are strangers to me but no different from our own children whom we always love and support.
Two days later, I visited the prison of Sundhara, Kathmandu, for my class in social work. I saw many such faces who reside in prisons alongside their incarcerated parents and I became sad. These children have done nothing wrong. They are simply caught up in something they don’t understand.
I couldn’t forget them so a few months later, along with some friends, we opened up a child daycare centre in a rented house. My parents were not happy and they told me to leave it. However, I was determined to take those children out of prison and look after them and educate them for the future.
When I started this, I was 21, and nobody believed in me. People thought I was crazy. They laughed at me.
After two years, in 2005, I established The Butterfly Home for the children. Then, I travelled to many other places, speaking with jailers, parents and authorities, preparing to bring children out of prison. My own parents now understood and helped me. We were so touched by the children’s plight, that they are forced to live with their impoverished, incarcerated parents because there is no one to look after them on the outside.
It has been eight years since I began gathering the children from Nepali prisons and bringing them to live in a centre in the capital, Kathmandu, providing them not only with food and shelter, but also education and motherly love. I am happy to be recognized as their mamu. Now I have become the second Nepali woman to win the 2012 CNN Hero Award at the star-studded award ceremony held in Los Angeles. But still 80 children are living in prison and I am going to take them out of the prison soon.
My name is Puspa Basnet and children are my hope. I believe the world is their place where they can carve their future with their own hands.
Prashanna Mahat, 15
Kathmandu
Exercises
Understanding the Story
How did Puspa Basnet get involved with helping the children?
1. The stars were ______________________________________________ in the sky.
2. The children’s parents are __________________________________ in the prisons.
3. The children have nowhere to ____________________________ out of the prisons.
4. Puspa Basnet was _______________________ to get the children out of the prisons.
5. Many people were affected by the ______________________ of these poor children.
6. To make something out of something can be to ____________________________ it.
7. The parents in the prison have no money; they are __________________________ .
Now you Talk
1. What would it be like to be one of those children living in the prison?
2. Where do they go to school?
3. Is there a way you could help these children?
Now you Create
1. Write a letter to the mayor of your town asking for help.
2. Draw a cartoon strip about this problem.
Role Play
1. Mother in prison, her son: talking about his going to school.
2. That son, another student: talking about where he lives.
3. Two Girls who live with parents in prison: talking about their lives.
4. Two guards in prison: planning to help the children
5. Puspa Basnet, mayor of town: talking about helping more children.
The Kidnappers
This is a true story that happened in Dada Gaun village near Laxmi bazaar in 2012.
One Saturday, Rina and Rehan, a brother and sister asked their parents if they could go to the park. Their parents said, “Please, go safely. There are so many bad people in the road.”
Rina said, “Don’t worry. We will be careful.” They crossed one town where many busses went here and there. They went to the park. While they were walking on the road, a micro bus stopped just beside them. The door opened and a man jumped out, grabbed them both and put them in the micro bus.
They were taken to the jungle which is near the park. They were so afraid and they cried a lot. Many hours went by. The kidnapper went near Rina and laughed. Rina asked, “Why are you laughing?”
The kidnapper said, “You are my one corore rupees. That is the ransom we will get from your parents. Give me your phone number. But Rina didn’t give it to him. He slapped her and said, “If you don’t give me your father’s phone number, I will kill you right now.”
Rina was afraid of him and gave the number. Meanwhile, the children’s parents were worried when they didn’t come home by evening time. Then their mobile phone rang. The kidnapper demanded one corore rupees as a ransom. The kidnapper said to him, “If you don’t give me the ransom money, you will see your children’s dead bodies.”
Hearing this, the father became more afraid. Then the father thought of a trick. “Where are you?” asked Rina’s father. The kidnapper said, “I am in the jungle near the park.”
While the father kept talking to the kidnapper, the mother called the police station and said, “Please save my children. They have been kidnapped. They are in the jungle near the park. The kidnapper demands one corore rupees as ransom. I don’t have even thousands.”
The police hurried and drove very quickly. They stopped the car in the park and walked into the jungle. They surrounded the microbus and caught the kidnapper. The children were saved.
Their parents gave many thanks to the police. They told the police not to let the kidnapper free because if he is free he would kidnap other children. After that he was put into the jail for his whole life.
Kasam Ale, 15
Gorkha
Exercises
Understanding the Story
What is a moral for this story?
Vocabulary
Fill in the blanks of the summary with the words below.
ransom surrounded kidnappers tricked
microbus worried careful grabbed
The children wanted to go to the park. Their parents were __________________ They said, “Be very _________________ . While the children were walking, a _________________ stopped and a man jumped out and _______________________ them. The men were __________________________. They demanded a _____________________ . The father ________________ the bad men. The police ____________ the kidnappers.
Now You Talk
1. What would you do if a kidnapper grabbed you?
2. How can you solve a crime with a mobile phone?
Now You Create
1. Draw a picture of the kidnappers.
2. Write another ending to this story.
Role Play:
1. Mother, girl: warning about bad people.
2. Girl, kidnapper: he asks for her phone number.
3. Sister, brother: planning how to get away from kidnappers
Students often ask me, “How can I learn English better and faster?” and I have trouble giving them an answer. I have taught English for more than 20 years and I have been a student of languages for more than 30, but I am still not sure how to answer their question. The problem, I think, is that they are looking for the one way to learn a language. But learning a language effectively requires that we use a number of different methods. In this blog, I want to address what I think is the single hardest part about learning a language to a high level—vocabulary—and to suggest a number of ways that learners can improve their knowledge and skills in this area.
Learning vocabulary is a real problem
In my experience as both a teacher and a student, the most time-consuming part of learning a language is usually vocabulary. People often worry about the problems of learning a new alphabet, script or other writing system, but although this is a problem in the beginning, it is really something in which we can make a lot of progress in just hours. There are some exceptions, Chinese being the most famous. But if someone wants to learn Arabic, Greek, Russian, Burmese, or some other script, ten or twenty hours of careful practice spread out over a few weeks will usually be enough. People also often worry about grammar, and it’s true that this will take longer. Here, it’s a matter of many months of practice.
But when it comes to learning vocabulary, it’s a matter of years, not of weeks or months. Many language learners discover that when they’ve reached a high intermediate level, they’re able to discuss, with some difficulty, many topics, but that even books written for ten-year-old native speakers are often too hard for them to understand. Why? When I ask students to take a page from a text and then to use two different colors to mark the grammar and the vocabulary problems they have with this text, they quickly see that they usually have only a small number of grammar problems per page, but they might have 20 or 50 or even more words whose meanings they cannot understand.
Reading even a book for a fifth grader requires a knowledge of thousands of head words. Ordinary conversation probably uses no more than one or two thousand head words. This means that simply relying on conversation will not give us a vocabulary large enough to read even texts that teenage native speakers can understand. If our goal is to be able to read university level materials, our work will be even harder.
Of course, if the language we are studying has a vocabulary that is closely related to a language we already know, then learning vocabulary won’t be so difficult. Spanish and French share a large percentage of their vocabulary. Both are descended from Latin and both have borrowed many technical words from Latin, so a person who knows one will find it quite easy to learn the vocabulary of the other. Similarly, most North Indian languages are closely related. Hindi, Bengali, Nepali, Gujarati, and many other languages are both descended from Sanskrit and have borrowed many of their specialized words from Sanskrit. A knowledge of one of these languages helps immensely in learning any of the others.
But when we are learning a language whose vocabulary has few connections with other languages that we know, we will have to spend hundreds, if not thousands, of hours reading, using dictionaries, memorizing, and practicing if we want to be able to function at a university level.
Learning vocabulary is a real problem. So what to do about it?
1 – Choose the right things to read
The simplest piece of advice for learning any skill is “practice…a lot.” But it’s not enough to simply practice, we must use effective practice, and this is where things start to become more difficult. In addition to the problem mentioned above—the very large number of vocabulary that must be learned—there’s another problem, namely, that to effectively learn vocabulary we need to concentrate on words that are appropriate for our level. The best way to do this is to find texts that are at the right level. If the texts are too easy, we won’t find enough new words to learn, but if the texts are too difficult, there will be too many new words and these words will often be too hard for us to use (that is, to practice) in our own speaking and writing.
The most important thing we can to do make learning vocabulary more effective is to choose texts that have about the right number of new words. Dr. Willy A Renandya is a senior lecturer at Singapore’s National Institute of Education, and he has done a great deal of research on extensive reading. He argues that the best texts to use are ones that are rather easy for the learner. What does “rather easy” mean? In percentage terms, this means that for extensive reading we should be using texts where only about 2% of the words are unknown to us. A paperback novel might have about 250 words per pages, so he suggests the Rule of Five. If the text is the size of a paperback novel, count the number of unknown words on page, and these should be fewer than five. If they are more than five, the learner will probably only be able to read a small number of pages before giving up in frustration.
There are several ways we can find such “rather easy” texts. One way is to use texts written for younger native speakers or language learners. Children’s books and school textbooks are two obvious choices. Poetry and songs will usually be harder than prose, and comic books are often not a good choice since they use so much slang.
Another source is graded readers. Graded readers are books that are written to match different levels (here called “grades”) in terms of both vocabulary and grammar. There are many publishers of graded readers: Oxford, Cambridge, National Geographic, as well as South Asian publishers. Most of them use some form of a 6-level scale to describe the difficulty of a text. They also publish a wide range of titles and genres; there’s fiction (both original and adapted), travel, science, geography, history, and many other topics. I urge my learners to start with a book at level 3 and read a few pages and apply Dr. Renandya’s Rule of Five. If the book is too hard, then they should choose a level 2 book and try it. If the book is too easy, then they should try a level 4 book.
But choosing the right level is only part of the solution. It’s also important that we chose the right kind of book. If we have a very specific purpose in learning a language, we should concentrate on texts connected with that purpose. For example, if our only interest in learning a language is to read biology texts, then we should focus on vocabulary connected with that field. Of course, we need to find levels at the right level of difficulty, so we could use graded readers about science and the environment or books for primary and secondary school students. However, if our goal is to function at the level of an educated person, we should not limit our reading. Instead, we should read texts from a variety of genres and about a variety of topics: science, fiction, travel, politics, religion, movies, food, sport, family, holidays, everything.
2 – Find the definitions
Finding the definitions sounds easy but actually can be the most boring part of learning vocabulary. There are a number of common mistakes people make but also several solutions.
The worst thing to do is to stop everyone time we find an unknown word and to then look it up in a dictionary. This completely breaks our attention. What should we do? I recommend using a highlighter (I happen to use an orange one for this purpose) to mark the unknown words as one reads. After I reach the end of the chapter, I’ll then go back and choose which of the highlighted words to actually look up in a dictionary. If I’ve chosen a book that’s not too difficult, there should be no more than five unknown words per page, which would mean perhaps 20 to 100 words per chapter.
I am a big believer in using flashcards. These are pieces of stiff paper on which we can write things that we want to memorize. I should emphasize three things. First, many language learners think that all they need to do is make flashcards and memorize the words in order to learn a language. That’s not true. We also need to practice how to use these words correctly, an issue I’ll address a bit later. A second problem is that many native speakers of English don’t like using flashcards and urge their students not to use them. In my experience, these native speakers tend to recommend that learners simply use context to guess the meanings or that they just absorb new vocabulary from books, TV, movies or other sources. In my experience, such people very often fail to learn any language to a university level. Although using context to guess meaning is very important, most learners are not able to learn thousands of words simply through methods like these. Third, many monolingual native English speakers insist that their students only use English-English dictionaries. I have little patience with this. Although once we reach an advanced or superior level, we might use such dictionaries, for lower levels the best choice is a bilingual dictionary.
Once I have finished a chapter or some other part of the text, I will choose which of the highlighted words to learn. Often I will try to learn all the words, especially if I’ve chosen a text with not too many unknown words. I use flashcards that are 3 centimeters by 6 centimeters and that are made of stiff paper like that used to make business cards. Some people prefer to use larger cards, but I find that this size, although small, is easy to hold in my hands. I write the unknown words on the cards and then I organize them alphabetically. Next, I use a dictionary to find definitions and I write these on the cards. I know that the next point will sound foolishly simple, but it’s important. When you write the definition on the card, make sure you write it on the back of the card (English on one side, and your own language on the other) and also be sure to turn the card upside down. Having the words on one side written upside down with respect to the other will make it much easier to flip the card for learning and reviewing.
3 – What kind of information to include on the flashcards?
For learners of English, it will often be necessary to write the pronunciation of the word on the flash card. If you are right handed, you will probably be holding the cards in your right hand, so I suggest writing the English word in the center of the card and then writing the pronunciation in the bottom right corner. This way, you can hide the pronunciation with your right thumb and use it to help to guess and study the pronunciation.
It also makes sense to write irregular forms (especially for verbs), and for this I recommend also using the lower right corner. And for the small number of irregular plural nouns (child – children, ox – oxen, woman – women, etc), you can do the same.
Another kind of information to include is derivatives. For example, for the card with the word reason on it, you might also want to write reasonable and rational on the English side and then to give the definition of each on the back.
It can also be useful to include together words that you often confuse. For example, beginners often have trouble with kitchen and chicken. Putting both on the same side of one card can help you practice them and can help you remember that they’re different.
4 – Collocations are important, too
Learners should certainly also include collocations. A collocation is a fancy word for a group of words that often come together. Some of these might be phrasal verbs: get over, get across, break up, break through, come off, drag into, see off. Others can be phrase: have a good time, be on top of the situation, find a solution to the problem. It’s not possible to learn all of these, but when we’re making flashcards, we should probably include some collocations.
5 – Moving beyond the dictionary: finding useful phrases
A dictionary won’t have every phrase that we want to say, but a could source to find this is our extensive reading. When we are reading, many times we’ll see a phrase or a sentence and think, “I didn’t know this before, but I can guess the meaning and I really need to learn how to say this!” When I read, I underline these useful phrases with a green ink pen (green = “go forward” in my mind, so I use green since I want to be able to go forward with these phrases). For example, when I was studying Bengali, I didn’t know how to ask “What does this word mean?” but one day I saw a sentence in a Bengali book and I was able to use context to understand that sentence. I immediately underlined it in green and also made a flashcard so I could practice it.
6 – Going from the discrete to the holistic
So far, most of the things I have emphasized have been discrete skills or discrete pieces of knowledge. “Discrete” means “in small pieces”. Although important, we also have to practice more holistic kinds of language. “Holistic” means “in wholes, not in pieces”.
One way to do this is to make short sentences from the words we see on our flashcards. We shouldn’t always just memorize these words as discrete (isolated) items but should also use them holistically (to make sentences, to have conversations). It’s especially easy to do this with collocations, but we should also try to use individual vocabulary items in sentences.
And what next?
Learners will find that after they get about a thousand or more flashcards, they will have trouble organizing them. It will no longer be possible to review all of these cards each day, nor will it be effective. Many words won’t require daily review to be remembered. In a future blog, I’ll consider the issue of how to organize one’s flashcards. I’ve been using flashcards regularly since the 1980s and for at least half a dozen languages I have more than 5,000 flashcards (for each of these languages). I agree that organizing them and also using them to maintain one’s knowledge of vocabulary is a real challenge, but I think I have some useful ideas. But that will have to wait.
English language teaching throughout the world has suffered from a monoglossic bias; that is, the view that English could only be taught in isolation and separated from the languages spoken by students. This was, of course, the pedagogical tradition that emerged from the West, and especially from North American and British scholars in particular, who saw the teaching of the English language as a monolingual imperialist enterprise. But in the 21st century, English teaching has gone global, no longer in the hands of colonial masters, but taught throughout the world by many who share language and culture with students. And yet, our pedagogies have remained as monolingual as ever, robbing students of opportunities to use their home languages to make sense of the complex use of English that is demanded in the world today.
I argue here that we need to adopt a translanguaging lens, a lens which allows us to think about language, bilingualism and learning from the perspective of emergent bilingual students themselves. I start by considering the concept of translanguaging. Using the translanguaging lens, I then provide counterarguments to some of the constructions about English language speakers, English language acquisition and learning, bilingualism, and language education that have been responsible for much failure in the teaching of English to students throughout the world.
Translanguaging
The term translanguaging was coined in Welsh (trawsieithu) by Cen Williams. In its original use, it referred to a pedagogical practice where students are asked to alternate languages for receptive or productive use; for example, students might be asked to read in English and write in Welsh and vice-versa. Since then, the term has been extended by many scholars (e.g. Blackledge & Creese 2010, Canagarajah 2011, García 2009; García & Sylvan 2011, Hornberger & Link 2012). I have used the term to refer to the flexible use of linguistic resources by bilinguals in order to make sense of their worlds, and I have applied it mostly to classrooms because of its potential in liberating the voices of language minoritized students.
I use translanguaging here to refer not to the use of two separate languages or even the shift of one language or code to the other (for simple Questions and Answers on translanguaging for educators see my introduction to Celic and Seltzer, 2012). Rather, translanguaging is rooted on the principle that emergent bilingual students select language features from a repertoire and “soft assemble” their language practices in ways that fit their communicative situations. Translanguaging in education can be defined as a process by which students and teachers engage in complex discursive practices that include ALL the language practicesof students in order to develop new language practices and sustain old ones, communicate and appropriate knowledge, and give voice to new sociopolitical realities by interrogating linguistic inequality. In today’s globalized world what is needed is the ability to engage in fluid language practices and to soft-assemble features that can “travel” across geographic spaces so as to enable us to participate fully as global citizens.
Counter-narratives about English, its speakers, learning English, bilingualism, and teaching English
The education of emergent bilinguals suffers from five major misconstructions about English, its speakers, the learning of English, bilingualism, and the teaching of English that can be counter-narrated through a translanguaging lens as follows:
English is not a system of structures.
“Native” English speakers are neither the norm nor objective fact.
Learning English is not linear.
Bilinguals are not simply speakers of a first and a second language.
The teaching of English cannot be enacted in total separation from other language practices.
I will develop these counter-narratives to deconstruct some of the myths with which we have been operating in educating emergent bilinguals.
English is not a system of structures
English forms and meaning are not auto-sufficient, but arise in and through social practice, as linguistic practices get used repeatedly in local contexts for meaning-making. Language is a series of social practices and actions that are embedded in a web of social relations and that orient and manipulate social domains of interactions. Pennycook (2010: 9) explains:
A focus on language practices moves the focus from language as an autonomous system that preexists its use, and competence as an internal capacity that accounts for language production, towards an understanding of language as a product of the embodied social practices that bring it about (my italics).
English is not a system of language structures; rather, languaging through what is called English is practicing a new way of being in the world. This understanding of what English is and is not has enormous implications for our conceptualization of English speakers, the next counter-narrative that I propose.
“Native” English speakers are neither the norm nor objective fact
It is important to recognize that monolinguals are not the norm in the world. Although estimates are difficult to make, well over half of the world’s population is bilingual or monolingual. In the second language acquisition literature, the “native” speaker is always held as the ideal. But the notion of who is a “native” speaker has been questioned in the fluidity of today’s global world. Often “native” has become indexical of being white. The ideology of the existence of a monolithic “native” English creates an order of indexicality (Blommaert, 2010) that favors the language practices of white prestigious monolingual speakers. Thus, the other “native” practices are reduced to being “corrupted,” “stigmatized,” “deficient,” “needing remediation.” As many have argued, there is no “native English standard.” Being a “native English speaker” is not simply being monolingual or speaking a certain way. At the same time, learning English does not happen in a vacuum, and is not linear. This is the misconstruction addressed by the counter-narrative in the next section.
Learning English does not proceed from scratch, is not linear
The learning of English has often focused on an end point, the ultimate attainment of a “native English standard.” When students haven’t achieved this, they are said to have a “fossilized interlanguage”; that is, their language system is said to be permanently deficient. Rarely has the learning of English paid attention to the resources students bring and to the dynamic process through which language practices emerge. But students are much more than just blank slates that are subsequently filled with English structures. They bring to classrooms knowledge, imagination, and sophisticated language practices. In addition, they do not forget what they know in order to take up English. These students are emergent bilinguals with full capacities. Their new language practices do not surface from scratch, but emerge in interrelationship with old language practices.
If the English language is not, as we have seen, simply a system of structures, then it follows that it is not possible just to add up structures in linear fashion in order to learn. Instead, English learning emerges as a flexible continuum, as students take up practices in interrelationship with others. The result is never an end point at which students “have” English. Rather, emergent bilinguals “do” language, languaging in ways that include practices identified as “English” in order to negotiate communicative situations and meet academic expectations. Emergent bilinguals are not simply in a stage of “incomplete acquisition.” The next section questions the misconstructions about bilingualism held by schools that have served to alienate the complex language practices of emergent bilingual students from English learning and provides an alternative narrative.
Bilinguals are not simply speakers of a first and a second language
Bilingualism in schools is often understood as being additive. Additive bilingualism refers to the idea that a “second language” can be added to a “first language,” resulting in a person who is a balanced bilingual. The views about languaging that I have been developing here lead us to reject the idea of “first” and “second” language, as well as balanced bilingualism.
Although most bilinguals may be able to identify which language they learned “first” and which language they learned “second,” the assignment of a “first” and “second” language to bilinguals is as much a theoretical impossibility as is the concept of being a balanced bilingual. New language practices emerge in interrelationship with old ones, and these language practices are always dynamically enacted.
I have argued that bilingualism can be better seen as dynamic. In contrasting dynamic bilingualism to an additive perspective, I go beyond simply the perspective of language systems and refer to the multiple and complex way in which the language practices of bilinguals interact and form a complex language repertoire. I have used the image of a banyan tree to suggest that language practices emerge and develop in intertwined ways.
As bilingualism emerges, the identification of language practices belonging to one or another “language” has to be questioned. Bilinguals translanguage, disrupting conventional ideas of what languages are or of the languages that bilinguals have. Bilinguals are clearly not two monolinguals in one. They use their complex language repertoire to fulfill the communicative needs that emerge from the different landscapes and speakers through which they shuttle back and forth. I have used the image of the All Terrain Vehicle to suggest that bilinguals use their complex language practices selectively as they adapt to the ridges and craters of communication in different languagescapes.
Traditionally, bilingual use has been understood as following a diglossic compartmentalization, with one language spoken at home, another one in school. But the translanguaging lens we have adopted makes clear that the language practices of bilinguals are transglossic, and that their full repertoire of practices is used in homes, and often “invisibly” in schools. The structures of language and education programs and their pedagogies have to respond to greater fluidity. This is the misconstruction addressed in the next counter-narrative.
The teaching of English cannot be enacted in total separation from other language practices
Traditionally, the teaching of English has taken place in English only. But as the complex translanguaging practices of bilinguals are made more evident, structures and pedagogies that separate languages artificially have to be abandoned. The language separation approach that is often used has to be abandoned.
All teachers must adopt translanguaging strategies in teaching. It would be important for English teachers to leverage the children’s entire language repertoire in making meaning and to develop the children’s metacognition and sense of self-regulation as they translanguage.
Oral discussions that include all students’ language practices enable their class participation, deep and reflexive thinking, and rigorous cognitive engagement with texts. The reading of difficult text is facilitated when students can access background material about the content of the text in other languages. Engagement with writing English texts is also facilitated when students can discuss, read and write first drafts that may include other language practices besides those that are in English. Translanguaging is an important tool.
A translanguaging lens enables us to understand the teaching of English to emergent bilinguals in new ways. Focusing on translanguaging practices enables us to shed notions of system structures that can be linearly taught, of the proper usage of natives, of the value of monolingualism, of bilingualism as simply double monolingualism, of the teaching of English without considering the entire language and semiotic repertoire of students.
References
Blackledge, A. and Creese, A. (2010) .Multilingualism. London: Continuum.
Blommaert, J. (2010). The Sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Canagarajah, A.S. (2011). Codemeshing in academic writing: Identifying teachable strategies of translanguaging. The Modern Language Journal 95(iii), 401-417.
Celic, C. and Seltzer, K. (2012). Translanguaging: A CUNY-NYSIEB Guide for Educators. New York: CUNY-NYSIEB. Online document: http://www.nysieb.ws.gc.cuny.edu/publicationsresources/
García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st Century: A Global perspective. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell.
García, O. and Sylvan, C. (2011). Pedagogies and practices in multilingual classrooms: Singularities in Pluralities. Modern Language Journal 95(iii), 385-400.
Hornberger, N. and H. Link. (2012). Translanguaging and transnational literacies in multilingual classrooms: A bilingual lens. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15(3): 261-278.
Pennycook, A. (2010). Language as a local practice. London and New York: Routledge.
*Ofelia García is Professor in the Ph.D. program of Urban Education and of Hispanic and Luso-Brazilian Literatures and Languages at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York. She has published many book chapters, articles, and books. She is the Associate General Editor of the International Journal of the Sociology of Language.
What students and teachers should do in a language classroom is best left to them. Language teaching is so complex and so contextually rooted that except for very general guidelines, nothing may really help in the actual task. What language professionals can at best do is to make available in as accessible a manner as possible content, form and format (oral, printed, digital etc.) material about the potential of the learner, aspects of nature, structure, acquisition and change of language, features of language variation, nature of learning processes, materials, methods and evaluation procedures. In this short article, I focus only on one issue that may be of some use to language teachers: How languages of learners in a given classroom is not an obstacle in the trajectory of language learning; it is in fact a resource not only in language teaching but also in enhancing cognitive growth and social tolerance.
Most teachers and several language professionals believe that languages of students are an obstacle in the process of learning another language. Many actually believe that they cause major interference and therefore students should not even be allowed to use their languages in the class and the school. The typical paradigm in which they work could be defined as ‘a class, a teacher, a text and a language’. Nothing if you reflect for a moment could be further from the truth. All classes are by default multilingual. Examine your own and examine your own language profile and that of your friends. Secondly, languages student bring with them are and can be used as a resource rather than dismissed as an obstacle. Languages always flourish in each other’s company; they suffocate in prisons of isolation and purity. English today is rich because it keeps its doors open; so were Sanskrit and Hindi till they started closing their doors. Thirdly, it is not at all difficult for all teachers and students to appreciate that all languages are equally rule governed and rich. This is something which is so effortlessly achieved if the strengths of a multilingual class are recognized. For example, all languages will have some technique to indicate the relationship between the subject and the verbal elements. That some languages may look more powerful than others is NOT a linguistic matter but one of history, sociology and politics and these aspects can also be easily demonstrated if the teachers are open to such a discourse. Languages like Latin, Greek, Sanskrit, Persian etc. were once very powerful; the power of English is only a few decades old and there is no reason to believe that it would stay like that. If you leave out china, Russia, Africa, India etc., the English speaking world is actually very small.
In any case, we do need to think why theories of interference hold such power and what’s wrong with them. These theories hold power because they are the most convenient answers to what is going on and they stop any deeper inquiry into the issues involved. It is a cosy corner that looks very attractive to a teacher who breathes some relief in saying: They will never learn; their languages always come in the way. What teachers don’t realize is that errors are necessary stages in the process of learning and what is being dismissed as interference may actually be a part of the UG driven way of acquiring a language or a milestone in the process of learning. Let’s consider some typical examples.
Let’s start with syntax. The fact of the matter is that there is actually no major difference between the basic syntactic structure of say Indian English and British or American English. All children, including those from the so-called native English communities, will make such errors as ‘he go to school’; the structural pressure of English syntax dictates that it should be so. Imagine everybody including ‘I, we, you, you plural, they’ ‘go’, why should poor ‘he, she, it’ ‘goes’!!! But if we stop comparing the behaviour of school or undergraduate learners with fluent speakers of ‘standard’ English, we will realize that all speakers of English, whether they acquire it as L 1 or L 2, learn to say ‘goes’ in due course. Take another oft quoted example of the invariant tag-question. When many speakers of the Asian subcontinent use ‘isn’t it’ with all kinds of statements, it is often pointed out as a major interference from say Hindi ‘hai na’ etc. Nobody takes the trouble of finding out how many ‘native’ varieties of English do the same. Some varieties of Canadian English certainly do it with a different invariant tag. Two points may be noted here. It may be a part of the standard commonly used Indian English and there is nothing wrong with this fairly understandable overgeneralization. In fact, in the speech of the teachers and the community, there may be no exposure to the variable tag question. Secondly, in the case of fluent users of Indian English, there may be many who actually use the variable tag question. What you eventually accept as a standard ‘correct’ usage is a matter that is located in a spatial, temporal, historical and sociological space.
Consider morphology. It is well attested that all children irrespective of whether they learn English as L 1 or L 2, go through a stage of using first ‘go, went, gone’ (as unrelated items) and then ‘go, goed, goed’ (as morphologically demanded items) and finally acquiring the exception ‘go, went, gone’. Imagine that all learners go through this stage and the set of irregular English verbs is rather large including such commonly used verbs as ‘come, cut, dig, do, eat, get, give, make…’ etc. Word formation strategies have nothing to do with interference. Yes, languages frequently borrow from each other, particularly cultural items. There is nothing you can do about it. English simply adds an additional appendix to its dictionary every year; speakers of course always move ahead of the dictionary.
Take phonology. Do all the so-called native speakers of English speak the same way? Will any one of you, unless she belongs to north of England, claim to understand a word of Yorkshire English? Or do you all understand rural Texan English? I don’t. I don’t even understand my grand-daughter studying in Malone in New York State. She finds it equally difficult to understand my Indian accent. Phonology is a marker of group identity and if you are really interested it will not come into your way after a while. But if you are already beyond 15-16 years of age, you will notice that your jaw is set and you may not get the ‘English English’ inter-dental fricatives, or the aspirated alveolar stops or the distinction between /v/ and /w/, which is really nothing to write home about unless you want a job at the BBC etc. Every variety has a right to its distinct identity.
So if languages of learners are not in our way, why do we make such a miserable mess of language teaching? At most places I know of, most learners don’t even manage to master the basic skills of reading comprehension and writing coherently. We do need to examine the language profile of our class. Every child brings a different linguistic and cultural resource to the class and these can indeed be sensitively assimilated into the teaching-learning process. The first requirement is of course that the teacher needs to walk out of the position of being the fountainhead of all knowledge and have faith in the ability of children to use their resources creatively. In actual classroom transactions it implies that the time taken by individual learners and their interactions in peer group would be much more than normally consumed by the teacher.
We today know that multilinguality is a default human situation and is constitutive of being human. Every classroom by default is inherently multilingual. Further, in a variety of ways, recent research has established how this multilinguality can be used not only as a resource but also as a teaching strategy and a goal. It correlates positively with language proficiency, cognitive growth, scholastic achievement, divergent thinking and social tolerance. It is also now well-established that levels of language proficiency enhance significantly with metalinguistic awareness which would tend to grow if we allow children to reflect on their languages.
What kind of strategies would be most useful in such situations? In fact, there is no limit and also no defining ‘models’. Freedom from the bondage of script is the first step. With very small effort on the part of learners and teachers, it becomes evident that all languages can be written in the same script, with some modifications. What we do need to understand is that all children and all their languages need to be involved and the teachers need to create situations in which children can work in groups collecting data from their languages, classifying it into different categories, examine the relationships among different parts and arrive at conclusions and hypotheses that would account for their data. Consider for example, the making of nouns from adjectives in English. Adjectives like ‘dark, lazy, rough, kind, small, rich, soft etc’ can be turned into nouns by adding ‘-ness’. However, this is not where teachers would start; they would instead start by talking informally about adjectives and nouns for a few minutes. Then leave it to groups of children who share some languages to make list of adjectives and related nouns in different languages available in the class. Hindi may not have any such strategy; but it may have some others. Or take the case of making plurals. With very limited guidance children will themselves work out the problems of saying that the plural in English is made not by adding ‘-s, -es or –ies’; once it is explained to them that they should focus on the sounds with which a plural ends, they work out that significance of ‘-s, -z and –iz’ in making plural, themselves pointing that the plural of say ‘dog and baby’ is made by adding the same sound. Another group will come up with a strategy for making plurals in Hindi which has not one but 3 plurals for each noun e.g. in the case of laRkaa ‘boy’, we have ‘laRke, laRkoN and laRko’, being the nominative, oblique and vocative plurals respectively. Consider the case of making ‘negatives’ in different languages. It is possible that children would themselves (and so would the teacher) discover that negatives in all languages are made by putting the negative element close to the verb of the main clause and if a rule is discovered in this way, it is rather unlikely that children would make mistakes in speaking or writing negative sentences. Take the case of translation. Nothing enhances language proficiency more than peer-group attempts at translation, not the traditional type of ‘literally and accurately translating from language X to language Y’. A small poem for example could be taken from any language. Notice that the power structures in the classroom at once start getting democratised; teacher is at the back of the classroom listening like others to a poem in an unknown language which is then written and explained by children in the script they are already using. The poem is then translated into several languages in small groups. Stories, plays, cultural events, social issues etc. could also be treated in a similar way. The kind of phonological, syntactic, semantic and semiotic issues such an exercise raises is overwhelming. The idea is to go through the process, not to arrive at a final, perfect translation.
*Rama Kant Agnihotri, D.Phil. (York), retired as Professor and Head, Department of Linguistics, University of Delhi. He is interested in and has taught and written extensively about Applied Linguistics, Morphology, Sociolinguistics and Research Methods for several years. He has lectured in Germany, UK, USA, Canada, Yemen, Sri Lanka, and Pakistan, among other countries. He has also been working with several NGOs across India in the area of elementary school education. He co-edits, with A. L. Khanna, the Sage series on Applied Linguistics. He was Chair of the NCERT Focus Group on The Teaching of Indian Languages during NCF 2005.
