We are pleased to announce the release of the Issue of ELT Choutari (October-December 2025). This issue presents a collection of reflective accounts from English language teachers and practitioners, offering diverse perspectives on teaching, learning, and research.
Since it is a generic issue, it includes articles from diverse fields of English language teaching in the context of Nepal. ELT Choutari is a platform to share the English language teachers’ experiences regarding their practices and experiences. This issue is the result of the same. For this, we are grateful to all the contributors. We encourage English language teachers and practitioners to contribute in the future issues as this can share and document our reflective practices.
The following section includes the contributors with the gist of their reflections. We hope their experiences and anecdotes will benefit our esteemed readers.
Mr. Dev Ram Joshi, in his article, explores the engagement of learners in English language learning through project-based learning integrated as internal assessment in the secondary level curriculum. His technical action research reflects that his students increased the time to study English subject, developed their writing skill including handwriting and composition skills and presentation skills such as pronunciation, clarity, and confidence. Meanwhile, they started to learn English by studying other reference materials as well.
Likewise, Mr. Dammar Singh Saud in his article drawing on personal experience and educational theories, argues for reflective, context-sensitive, collaborative, and well-resourced Teacher Professional Development. He advocated that, learning from countries like Finland and Singapore, Nepal must prioritise teacher agency, mentorship, digital readiness, and long-term systemic reform.
Similarly, Mr. Khem Raj Rauteda, in his article, reflects his experience implementing translanguaging pedagogy to enhance learner engagement in a multilingual secondary classroom in Nepal. Through reflecting on his role as a facilitator and co-learner, he found that translanguaging nurtured culturally responsive pedagogy, strengthened relationships, and empowered students, providing valuable insights for inclusive English language teaching in multilingual contexts.
Similarly, Mr. Janak Sigdel, in his article, explores the ongoing challenges of implementing Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in rural community schools in Nepal. His reflection highlights key barriers, including inadequate infrastructure, lack of electricity, limited internet access, and low digital literacy among teachers. His article underscores the growing digital divide between urban and rural schools, advocating for policy interventions and capacity-building programmes to promote more equitable and sustainable ICT integration in education.
Likewise, Mr. Nar Bahadur Bist, in his article, deals with the complicated and changing nature of English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) in language planning and policy in Nepal. He discusses how English has established a dominant presence in the education system, as well as a larger presence in society, despite Nepal’s non-colonial relationship with Britain, shaping ideologies, creating inequalities, and affecting cultural identity.
Moreover, Mr.Arjun Jung Rayamajhi, in his article, discusses the integration of ChatGPT in English language teaching in Nepalese community schools with its opportunities and challenges. He argues that ChatGPT offers the possibility to experience a personalized learning process and support engagement growth in the underprivileged setting. However, it also emphasizes the significance of the human factor, critical thinking, and ethical competence.
For your convenience, here are the hyperlinks to the blog posts:
Lastly, we extend heartfelt gratitude to all our editors and reviewers — Ganesh Kumar Bastola, Jeevan Karki, Dr. Nani Babu Ghimire, Dr. Jnanu Raj Poudel, Sagar Poudel, Binod Duwadi, Puskar Chaudhary, Dr. Yadu Prasad Gnawali, and Dasharath Rai—for their dedicated efforts in bringing this issue to completion.
ELT Choutari is a platform for researchers, scholars, educators, and practitioners to share insights, practices, and narratives from classrooms and communities. We invite you to contribute to our upcoming issue by submitting your articles and reflections to 2elt.choutari@gmail.com.
The development of artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the global education system. ChatGPT and effective AI models are now essential innovations in the language teaching and learning field. By providing technology to community schools with limited resources and infrastructure, scholars can gain insight into the potential and challenges of AI in resource-poor environments. This paper is a reflection of the recent empirical studies and my personal experience as a teacher and researcher to relate critically to the effects of ChatGPT on English language teaching. The input analyses the moderation through which AI transforms pedagogy, addresses learners’ differentiated desires, and works under the moral and infrastructural measurement of AI technology in Nepal. The data of this input are grounded in teacher interviews, classroom observations, and student-centred surveys, digging deep into the use and impact of AI tools. The output provides recommendations for maximising ChatGPT use to promote language acquisition in resource-scarce classrooms while alleviating accessibility, training, and moral challenges.
The ChatGPT: A Personalized and Engaging Commitment
The individualized ChatGPT capability to provide learners with feedback that is personal and immediate has been a possible offer of integration of learners up until now; something that is not practicable in a typically busy community classroom. ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence model called OpenAI, which is a state-of-the-art generative machine that can understand and produce human-like text after recognition of the given output. It is, in other words, a pillage of the substitution of creative slaves. It is also a testament to the increasing sensibility that there is a need for differentiated instruction (Zhang, 2022). In its essence, the ChatGPT implies that learners should learn at a pace which is commensurate with the timing that befits them. I personally think the OpenAI model is selfish and a more strenuous taskmaster. The state-of-the-art artificial intelligence OpenAI is more observant than a schoolteacher is and is a capable assistant anytime, even when students are away from the classroom (Sharma & Koirala, 2021). It makes the conversation more interactive and more exciting; the chatbot responds in the way the learner asks the questions. This miraculous discovery also helps shift it from the strength of monologue teaching, making space for the value of voices by offering the learners opportunities to communicate, share, be more interactive, and engage in the conversation (Patel & Uddin, 2022). Indeed, it is a deviation that it is possible because the basis for differentiation and the structure of any learning system is a one-size-fits-all mentality (Thapa, 2021). Time has changed, and increasing sensitivity embraces the ideas of differentiated instruction in such a diversity of educational responses from the learners.
Pedagogical Transformation: From Deliverer to Facilitator
As for the pedagogical transformation, the other phenomenon observed with the help of ChatGPT is the possibility to shift the role of teachers from the main source of knowledge to the person who designs the improved learning processes (Mishra & Koehler, 2006). The key manifestation of this AI incorporation was the opportunity to use AI not as the medium to replace a teacher but as a tool that supports the learning process. In this way, teachers stop being the main content deliverers and become the facilitators and guardians of the AI-supported learning process. Generally, teachers are also communicators and problem-solvers; they possess the complex skill set that they should hand down to their students. The example of the pedagogical transformation made me reflect on the potential of teachers to design more individualistic and student-friendly plans that incorporate a range of AI-based tools. This, of course, requires teachers to become literate in AI and be aware of the options and the limitations of machines in their problem-solving strategies. To me, such a transfer implies a range of professional development opportunities, a permissive organisational culture, and facilitating policies regarding the conditions under which teachers can participate in experimentation and engage in reflective practice.
Confronting Challenges: Infrastructure and Equity
I acknowledge that the successful integration of AI requires teachers to balance the affordances of the digital media and their professional judgment and situational knowledge. It challenges teachers to organise print-based interpretations so that the students’ work is steerable, so that it can provide the role of humans, such as motivation and ethical guidance, because their work was or could be used to take advantage of the affordances of the artefact. Even though I view my reflection from an optimistic perspective, it is a fact that the infrastructural and resource challenges persist in the schools of Nepalese communities. For instance, the lack of internet connections, the lack of digitalisation of the devices, and sporadic power interruptions become an obstacle to the promise of the integration of AI. Socially, such disparities present threats of increasing the inequities in education that would favour the students in cities or good school districts over disadvantaged rural students. I think my reflection necessitates an immediate policy action to close this gap and investments in enhancing digital infrastructure and the fair distribution of technology.
Ethical Considerations: Striking a Balance between Innovation and Integrity
Another ethical aspect that has been imprinted in my mind was the issue of danger. While ChatGPT has the potential of becoming a learning scaffold, one of its applications, the unregulated and unrestricted use, could lead to more plagiarism, reduced creativity, and a weaker need for critical thinking. All three problems touch upon excuses issued by educators when talking about ChatGPT. In my view, the solution is neither to eliminate the use of AI nor to promote the paradigms of its application that would be equitable. Teachers and policymakers play the most active role in the promotion of decency, offering students digital ethics lessons that teach them how to use AI tools meaningfully and responsibly. In the Nepalese context, a considerable amount of national and institutional support is needed. On a national scale, the government should adopt a policy that would regulate the use of AI in education, making it more just. For this, the curricula change is a must, with digital ethics and literacy being added. Moreover, the government should offer guidance and resources for educators, explaining how to use AI responsibly. On the institutional scale, a school should pay due attention to the note of how important academic honesty, perseverance in the face of misuse, and the desire to solve problems instead of finding an easy way out are. Teachers will always be in need; such moral custodians will have to teach students how to become their own moral mentors, inciting them to use ChatGPT as a source of inspiration for development, rather than praise for creativity.
Moving toward Sustainable Integration: Policy Support and Professional Development
As has been discussed above, the integration of ChatGPT cannot be successful via a technical training programme but rather one that is evidence-based with pedagogical, ethical, and reflection aspects. From the reflection I have undertaken, professional development is continuous, situational, and participatory. The aspects can create teacher confidence and innovativeness. Education policymakers can help in developing clear guidelines and ethical norms that ensure AI supplements the current subject matters and increases universal access. To achieve this measure, the initiatives should be co-designed with teachers, students, and communities to be culturally responsive and viable.
Conclusion
This paper discusses the implementation of ChatGPT in Nepalese community schools, identifying its benefits and drawbacks, and analyzing its potential contribution to English language acquisition. It discusses AI applications like ChatGPT, which offers the possibility to experience a personalized learning process and support engagement growth in the underprivileged setting. The implementation of ChatGPT at Nepalese community schools offers more advantages than disadvantages. While achieving individual educational plans and centring students resulted in multiple case benefits, this method requires stronger control on the part of teachers, infrastructural investments, and ethical considerations regarding the current programme. Policymakers and teachers can use this to understand that while the introduction of new technology can be more advantageous, this consideration should also be supported with a relevant and sensitive approach based on the context and students’ perspectives. This paper confirms the opinion on the potential extension of the educational process with the help of technology. However, it also emphasizes the significance of the human factor, critical thinking, and ethical competence.
The implementation of ChatGPT in Nepalese community schools can truly be an opportunity. It seems to be the most eternal way to individualised learning, which guarantees student interest with the help of an approach based on an individualistic manner. Still, it has a number of challenges, such as the appearance of new teacher roles, impacts on infrastructure, and the necessity to consider ethical considerations all the time. The future of AI-enhanced language learning is conditioned by the context-targeted planning and assumes the consideration of the educator’s expertise, institutional and national policy, and independence of the students.
References
Adhikari, P., & Pradhan, S. (2021). Digital inequality and its impact on education in Nepal. International Journal of Education and Development, 43, 2, 114–128.
Bates, T. (2020). Teaching with AI: Embracing artificial intelligence in education. Educational Technology Journal, 58, 6, 22–34.
Bhandari, S. (2021). Promoting digital literacy in Nepal’s education system. Asian Journal of Educational Research, 5, 3, 45–52.
Bista, B. (2022). AI and education: Opportunities and challenges in Nepalese community schools. Journal of Nepalese Education, 17, 1, 88–101.
Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., … & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877-1901.
Gautam, M. (2021). Teacher preparedness for AI integration in education in Nepal. Journal of Modern Education, 25, 4,110-125.
Giri, A. (2021). Differentiated instruction in Nepal’s classrooms: An AI perspective. Nepal Journal of Education Studies, 9, 2, 102–114.
Hwang, G. J., & Chu, H. C. (2021). AI-assisted personalized learning and its effects on student performance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 1, 87–104.
Khatiwada, S., & Bhandari, P. (2022). Pedagogical transformation through AI in Nepalese schools. Journal of Educational Development, 10, 1, 50–64.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 6, 1017–1054.
Zhang (2022). Towards risk-aware artificial intelligence and machine learning systems: An overview. Decision Support Systems, 159, 113800.
Patel, P., & Uddin, M. N. (2022). AI for algorithmic auditing: Mitigating bias and improving fairness in big data systems.International Journal of Social Analytics,2(1), 49.
Thapa, K. (2021). Adapted long short-term memory for concurrent human activity recognition. Computers, Materials &Continua, 69(2),16531670.
Author’s Bio: Mr Arjun Jung Rayamajhi is an MPhil scholar in English Language Education at Kathmandu University. He is a secondary-level English language teacher at a community school in Nepal, where he has been actively engaged in classroom teaching, academic mentorship, workshops, and training. His research areas are ICT and ICT-based teaching. He can be reached at arayamajhi16@gmail.com.
English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) is the educational approach in which English is used to teach all subjects. The use of EMI involves teaching subjects from the academic curriculum, for example, Science, Maths, and History in English, where English is neither the native nor the dominant language in school, college, or university. Consequently, English becomes the medium through which a student learns, instead of being taught as a subject itself. I focus on English as a medium of teaching in language policy and planning. When I look back at the history of Nepal, the English have no colonial past. However, it has maintained a major ideological influence since the Rana dictatorship. When Rana Prime Minister Jung Bahadur Rana first visited Britain, he was drawn to the use of the English language. He brought two Englishmen, Mr. Ross and Canning, to teach English to his children. Since then, English has become widely used and popular in Nepal. It has caused societal division by reinforcing inequalities in education, opportunity, and cultural identity. At the time, Rana Prime Minister, including Jung Bahadur Rana, created a schism among his family members when he stated that he would forsake everything and teach his children English. Nepal cannot remain unaffected by the global growth of the English language. It is included as one of the languages spoken in Nepal in the Constitution of Nepal 2015. In Nepal, English is taught as both a topic and a medium of education. Since their inception, most private schools have used English as their primary medium of instruction. Community schools are primarily Nepali medium schools, although EMI is now considered a need in many schools as well. EMI is causing friction between private and community schools in Nepal. There is a common notion that private schools celebrate good results because of EMI. However, their success is due to a variety of circumstances. As we all know, Nepal is celebrating its diverse language, religion, ethnicity, and race. Despite its modest size, the country is rich in language and culture. The documents include the Nepalese Constitution 2072, the National Curriculum Framework 2076, the Education Act 2028, the School Sector Development Plan, and the School Sector Reform Plan 2072. Multilingual education initiatives focus on mother tongue-based multilingual education, particularly at the primary level. However, these documents, notably the Basic Level Curriculum 2076 (Grade 1-3), expressly state that English can be used as the medium of instruction for subjects like as Science and Mathematics. So, these materials are confusing educators.
Institutionalization and Socio-economic Impact of English
Institutionalization and Socio-economic Impact of English, the introduction of English into Nepal’s Schools has drastically shifted the educational and social landscape of the country. Initially introduced in Nepal during the Rana regime as a sign of elite status and modernity, today, the English language is a powerful form of social mobility and academic status (Bhattarai & Basnet, 2020; Pennycook, 2018; Saud, 2020). English is now being taught and is increasingly being used as the medium of instruction in private schools, and for teaching in public schools. This shift shows the belief that knowledge of English brings quality education, global prospects (Adhikari, 2021; Sharma & Thapa, 2022). English is a language linked with power and a similar form of status in society. Even less advantaged families like to send their children to private schools as a result of EMI opportunities. The spread of EMI in private schools happened very quickly, and now private schools are popping up everywhere. Even at the local government level, they are encouraging EMI in Dipayal, Silgadhi Municipality and Doti by making EMI compulsory at the local government level. Such efforts surely show their enthusiasm for English. The establishment of English in the institutional context of Nepal has profoundly changed the educational space and society in Nepal. English, which was introduced into the country during the Rana regime as a marker of elite status and modernity, has evolved into a powerful vehicle for social mobility and academic prestige. English is now taught and is also frequently used as the medium of instruction in private schools, and increasingly in public schools. This shift reflects an underlying belief that proficiency in English brings quality education, global opportunity, and upward social mobility. It is connected with power and distinguished status in society. Even low-income families prefer to send their children to private schools due to EMI. It has spread quickly, and private schools are mushrooming. Even the local government is encouraging the English language in Dipayal, Silgadhi Municipality and Doti, and they have made EMI compulsory at the local level. This kind of exercise certainly demonstrates a love of the English language.
Social Justice through EMI
The use of EMI in Nepal’s education system affects the potential for social justice. It creates unequal access to the quality of teaching provided by EMI. Students from urban, high backgrounds admitted in present-day private schools receive a rich education, while students from rural, i.e. low-income backgrounds have limited access to and practice with English, especially in community schools. Students from urban, high-income backgrounds who are admitted to private schools. Recently, they received a wealth of educational resources, while students from rural, low-income backgrounds have little access to and practice of English, particularly in community schools (Bhattarai & Basnet, 2020; Timsina & Rai, 2019). This is not just an academic disadvantage for community school students, but a social reproduction disadvantage. English is a vital and crucial part of employment and the upper social class (Sharma & Thapa, 2022). Likewise, EMI is associated with colonialism, Western culture. This is the disadvantage of community school students in terms of not simply academic outcomes, but also social reproduction. English is a major and essential part of employment and higher social standing. Similarly, EMI is linked with colonial influence and Western culture. Hence, EMI develops the disintegration of multiple indigenous languages and cultures, with destruction, linguistic inequality and cultural detachment of Nepalese students. Language and culture are interrelated with each other when language enters the nation; it inherently brings its culture. Not all students have the same access to English. Children from rich or urban families often go to private schools where they learn English. But many poor or rural students go to local schools where English is not taught well, or not at all. This creates a big gap in learning. I have mentioned subtopics about social injustice below.
Access and Variation in Education
Ethnic and linguistic minority students’ experiences show that the separation between private and public education in Nepal deepened by the introduction of EMI. Private schools as one of the most well-resourced and culturally competent educational forms in the country, which offer high-quality EMI programmes for wealthy and prosperous families. Community schools, in contrast, work with families representing rural, low-income people. The inequalities linked with education lead to collected effects on the lives of oppressed families and students who cannot afford private schools and are unable to get quality education.
Neglecting people and Cultural perception
The practice of English-only instruction in education and public life results in the social disuse of languages like Doteli, Maithili, Tamang, Newari, and others. As parents work to give their children better opportunities, they encourage their children to speak English, and younger generations are abandoning their languages altogether. These parents are unknowingly sending messages of cultural disconnection and eventually loss of language. The emphasis on individual economic advancement negates Nepal’s multilingual identity and values. The present generation is taught English, leaving their mother tongues.
Socioeconomic Stratification and Symbolic Power
In Nepal, the ability to speak English is becoming a social marker for intelligence, achievement, and social status. Students with fluent English abilities will command a greater amount of respect and access to higher education, government work, and business opportunities in society. The symbolic power of English establishes class boundaries, because only individuals who are recognized can afford EMI-based education. Thus, another protector of advantage is language, namely, the exclusion of individuals who cannot engage.
In Nepal, the importance of English has led to the marginalization of other native languages. Marginalization means the inconsequence associated with what is not major, not central, and not powerful. In Nepal, English is preferred in every sector, including education, banking, hospitals, and so on. Private schools teach in English, and students who speak good English are often given more respect and better opportunities. Because of this, many parents want their children to learn English instead of their own mother tongue. As a result, local languages like Doteli, Newari, Maithili, Tamang, Tharu and many others are being used less, especially by young people.
In higher education, government jobs and business English are often liked. This makes it harder for people who speak only Nepali to compete. When one language becomes more powerful, others slowly lose their importance. This is how English, even without meaning to, is pushing local languages aside. The government even mandates English as a subject in the early grades. It has been made a compulsory subject from grade 1 to the bachelor’s level. It has secret power in Nepalese society. In the context of Nepal, many parents prefer to send their children to private schools. English is synonymous with high-quality education in Nepal. Privatization in education is widespread in Nepal. Private schools are proliferating and offer English-medium teaching. Such private schools reflect English culture, including Halloween. English has had a significantly greater influence on the local language, culture, and identity.
Conclusion
Overall, the article analyses the essentialist celebration of English as a neutral instrument of development. It advocates for a more critical and socially just approach to language planning that recognizes English’s potential for global utility while also protecting linguistic rights, cultural heritage, and equitable access to education. Stunning, this balance is essential in supporting Nepal as it negotiates its multifaceted identity and aspirations in a globalized landscape. In Nepal, many local schools are switching mediums of instruction from local languages to English as the medium of instruction. While Nepal is a UN state that has a language in education policy, which was developed upon recommendations to educate children in their mother tongue and promote bilingualism for better long-term learning, the policy is hardly followed in practice. The official approach, as mother tongue-based multilingual education is encoded, has been replaced with EMI, which runs counter to its intentions. The transition to EMI was fast-tracked after Nepal adopted a federal system of government in 2015, where local governments had power over local language policy. Although this national plan (2016-2023) sought to endorse local languages, almost all local governments, especially in urban areas, have chosen EMI.
References
Adhikari, R. (2021). The impact of English as a medium of instruction on indigenous languages in Nepal. Language Policy and Society, 7(3), 210–225.
Bhattarai, M., & Basnet, J. (2020). English Language Teaching and Social Stratification in Nepal. Nepalese Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 78–95.
Kafle, N. P. (2023). Language policy and practice in Nepal: English as a medium of instruction. Journal of Language and Education, 9(1), 45–62.
Pennycook, A. (2018). The cultural Politics of English as an international language. Routledge.
Saud, M.S. (2020). English medium public schools in Nepal: A new linguistic market in education. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language,23(2), 319-333.
Sharma, S., & Thapa, D. (2022). English-Medium education and social inequality in Nepal: A critical overview. International Journal of Multilingual Education, 14(2), 102–118.
Timsina, L., & Rai, P. (2019). Multilingual education and policy challenges in Nepal. Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 33–47.
Author’s Bio: Mr. Nar Bahadur Bist is an ELT practitioner from Doti, Nepal. He is currently pursuing an MPhil in ELT from Kathmandu University, School of Education. He is an English instructor at Seti Technical School, Rajpur, and a secondary-level teacher at Martyrs Memorial Residential Secondary School, Doti. His areas of interest include English language teaching, linguistic study, EMI and ELT study of language, and teacher professional development. He can be reached at narbist22@gmail.com.
Project-based language learning is a procedural approach of language learning activities through the planning, exploring, analyzing, and synthesizing, in which the learners present their findings in the class either orally or in written form (Beckett, 1999). Dhungana (2025) believes that the project-based learning (PBL) model encourages students to learn actively by using different strategies to develop their language skills and improve achievement. He further supported this model as an opportunity and a transformative method to develop the 21st-century skills in the learners to maintain international standards. Furthermore, PBL creates a productive environment for learning, but the projects are to be selected rigorously, students are to be guided in each step, and there should be proper assessment of the students to encourage all of them for meaningful learning and cosy presentation in the class (Fleming, 2000). PBL can be taken as an innovative and inquiry-based learning method that fosters learners’ active engagement in language learning through continuous guidance of teachers and exploration of students. This framework of learning develops not only the language skills but also the soft skills during the process of conducting and completing the project works (Ecuador, 2019; Maulina, 2024; Nasir & Dermawan, 2021).
The concept of PBL was developed by stepping on the project method (Kilpatrick, 1918), experiential learning and teaching (Dewey, 1938), and sociocultural theory (Vygotsky, 1978). Similarly, the historical steps for this approach began after the 1980s, when a task-based approach to language learning took place in ELT (Beckett & Slater, 2005; Wang, 2020). In the context of Nepal, this method gained value in the Nepalese education system when the national curriculum framework (2076 B.S.) envisioned life skill-based and competency-based subject-wise curricula. Then, the English curricula and textbooks, including other subjects, incorporated project works after each chapter of the textbooks from grades six to twelve. Additionally, the curriculum development centre has designed an internal evaluation guideline (2080 B.S.), which provides rubrics to evaluate students’ project works and other academic activities objectively and reliably.
Regarding empirical studies on project-based learning (PBL), the existing literature focuses on the effectiveness, challenges, and possibilities of PBL in the EFL classroom (Dhungana, 2025; Sanchez, 2019; Maulina, 2024; Devkota et al., 2017; Guslyakova et al., 2021; Aldabbus, 2018). Likewise, other studies have focused on how PBL fosters learner active participation and confidence of students in EFL classrooms (Aubrey, 2021; Giri, 2016; Nasir & Dermawan, 2022). Furthermore, Bastola (2021) examined how PBL can guide students to solve problems while learning English. Acharya (2023) analyzed the perceptions, practices, and challenges while applying PBL in health education. Gibbes and Carson (2014) scrutinized PBL from learners’ perspectives, Yuliani (2017) studied how PBL can enhance learner autonomy, and Somani and Rizvi (2018) compared PBL and traditional approaches of language teaching under a quasi-experimental design. However, I could not find the studies on PBL that investigated it to promote English language learner investment and integration of internal assessment with it.
I found my students avoiding investing in English language learning, which led them to low performance in all skills and aspects of language activities. Then, I asked them how much time they invest in English, and they replied that they only spent five to twenty minutes on English, and they again added that they usually do not pay much attention to the English subject, as they can pass it. I thought that if they depend only on classroom teaching and do not put in extra efforts outside the class, they might not perform what the are capable of. Similarly, overconfidence and exam-focused preparation in any subject is not good for knowledge and personal development. Therefore, this study aims to enhance learner investment through PBL incorporated with internal assessment techniques in secondary level students of Nepalese public schools by using the following research questions.
How does PBL, integrated with internal assessment, enhance learner investment in learning English?
What are the challenges and possibilities while implementing PBL in the EFL classroom?
Methods
As a practitioner teacher, I improve my professional practices with the help of action research by following the steps: planning, acting, observing, and reflecting (PAOR) (Burns, 2010). In this research, I have employed a project-based language learning approach integrated with an internal assessment system as the interventional technique to increase the time, effort, and dedication of my secondary level students in English language learning under the framework of technical action research by following the PAOR structure (Kemmis et al., 2014). The students of grade nine and ten (e.g. English medium sections of 9A and 10A), who numbered thirty and fifty students respectively, were the participants. I got my students to complete the projects mentioned in the textbook in regular teaching. Here I have presented projects: reading, writing, observing, and giving a speech project and peer/classroom teaching as the integrated project works, which I had provided during two long vacations, and I supported them to present their projects in the class. I observed how they have prepared and what resources they have studied, I collected their reports and looked at them closely, and I observed their classroom presentation by following the rubrics. Similarly, I had surveyed the status of students about their time, efforts, and dedication that they have about English language learning by asking open-ended questions. Finally, I analyzed the reflections that occurred in the class based on thematic analysis, followed by research questions and themes generated from classroom performance of students (Burns, 2010; Kemmis, McTaggart, & Nixon, 2014; Mertler, 2019).
Results and Discussion
Reading, Writing, Observing, and Giving Speech Project
As I had assigned the task of preparing a long essay, most of the students had prepared the essay as per the instructions, and a few students expressed the reasons for not completing the project work. And I provided them a few days to complete the task. Meanwhile, I provided feedback on their essays and guided them to make a final draft of the essay to record them in the file of project work. To make a clear understanding of the topic, we discussed the topic, and most of the students took part in the conversation actively. After the reading, writing, and observing (i.e., watching and listening) activities, students were taken towards preparing a draft of a speech to present in the class and one day, public speaking training was conducted by using multimedia and teaching the techniques of giving a speech. Students presented their speeches one by one every day. I evaluated their speech based on the modified criteria of internal assessment (e.g., report preparation-5, accuracy and clarity-5, confidence and style-5, content coverage-5, Timing-5), and I converted 25 marks into 16 marks to match the criteria of the internal assessment guideline, as there is a provision of testing listening and speaking for 16 marks. Thus, this project work contributed to the development of not only all language skills and aspects but also collaboration, confidence, creative, and interpretive skills as the students got help from peers, teachers, and other references during the process.
There was a girl who was unable to buy a copy for making notes, but she bought a grammar book and practice book, being encouraged to learn English after I conducted public speaking training for a week. I asked her, “Why and how did you manage the money for all these things?” She happily answered that she went to work on the farm as a labourer for five days and earned twenty five hundred rupees, which was enough for her. After such a long preparation, huge efforts, and investment of time, effort, and dedication, she was able to give such a nice performance. The integrated and task-based activities encourage students to be involved in learning activities for a long time (Joshi, 2024). He further claimed that the writing proficiency gaps could be maintained through continuous support to the students and involving them in publishing booklets of their project works. Similarly, Joshi (2025) claimed that the empathetic communication and supportive environment in the class help students to cope with stress during the preparation and presentation of academic activities. Furthermore, active participation and confidence of students can be enhanced through balanced project work in EFL classrooms (Aubrey, 2021; Giri, 2016). To sum up, it is certain that the PBL enhances the learner investment if the project works are designed carefully and if the students are supported in each step, not only in the classroom but also through technology and library resources.
Classroom/Peer Teaching Project
My English medium students were good at reading and average at speaking and writing skills. Therefore, I guided them to select any reading text and prepare for teaching to develop all their language skills integratively. Therefore, I provided this project work during the long holiday of Dashain and Tihar. When the classes began, I checked my students’ project works and provided feedback on their word meanings, answers to the comprehension questions, and other tasks that they had worked on. Before getting them to present their lessons, I explained and clarified their confusion related to the texts. I guided my co-teachers (students) to present their lessons at the beginning of the class within the timeframe of ten to twenty minutes, but some students requested the whole period of 45 minutes, and then I checked their preparation first and allowed them to take the whole class, ensuring detailed preparation. Meanwhile, I facilitated and judged them during their presentations. Some of the students presented excellent, and some did average. However, the hopeful point was that they maximized their time, efforts, and devotion in English language learning activities.
There was a boy in grade ten who used to stay passive in the class, but he used to ask questions related to English, not related to the current topic. When I provided him a chance to teach, he taught in such a way that students exclaimed with delight that his performance was perfect. After the presentation, I asked him how much time he had spent preparing for the lesson, and he replied with pride that he had spent a week for the preparation; consulting extra books, watching YouTube videos, and discussing with Chat GPT to prepare the lesson. Similarly, there was a girl in grade nine who was assumed to be fussy as she used to remain passive but talkative with her friends. She was average in subject matter, quiet, and not interested in communicative activities in English. However, when she got a chance to present her lesson, she used a clear, confident, commanding voice while teaching and used English most of the time. I asked her the same question, and she replied that she had worked two weeks to prepare a lesson. Rusli et al. (2021) accepted that peer teaching is significant to enhance the academic achievement of students as it creates an environment that develops confidence and motivation. Yuliani (2017) also supported this and claimed that PBL promotes learner autonomy.
Integration of Internal Evaluation with PBL
National Curriculum Framework (2076), Secondary Level Curriculum (2078), and Internal evaluation criteria (2080) recommend the incorporation of internal evaluation of English from nine to twelve with regular learning facilitation process through creative tasks and project works. Similarly, there are listening and speaking skills to be tested separately for 16 marks. However, the curriculum’s intention is for integrated language learning activities. Therefore, I decided to test language skills integratively through project works that I discussed earlier. I tested listening and speaking skills as per the curriculum during the classroom teaching. Saud et al. (2024) also emphasized the modification of internal assessment rubrics to contribute to learning language with a holistic approach rather than just evaluating students’ achievement.
Challenges and Possibilities of PBL in EFL Classrooms
Besides the unlimited benefits of project-based learning, due to more closures of schools and frequent holidays, not all of the students got a chance to present their projects by taking the sufficient time they wanted. Additionally, the lack of time challenged me as well because I could not conduct learning activities by covering all the projects mentioned in the textbook. Although the students were motivated to engage in project work, a few students got frustrated due to the lack of resources that they required to prepare for the projects. Some students have neither access to additional materials nor the library (e.g., physical or digital), in the initial stage, they did not accept these PBL techniques as it was new and had never been presented in class before as a regular part of learning, so the lack of confidence prevented them from smooth learning. Similarly, the students with a poor language base tried to avoid the project works, but they did so after the huge support and encouragement.
Despite the challenges, the project-based language-learning model creates space for an open, context-specific, and active learning environment if we can manage the challenges mentioned earlier. Similarly, the effective implementation of internal evaluation incorporated with regular teaching and PBL techniques can ensure the required investment and engagement of all learners and support for proficiency gaps as well. The internal evaluation criteria are used for providing marks to prepare results, but these have not been incorporated effectively with classroom teaching and internal evaluation in many schools, due to students feeling threatened in project works without a support system (Saud et al., 2024). Therefore, only after creating supportive mechanisms and effective implementation of internal evaluation can learning opportunities be provided (Joshi, 2025). Devkota et al. (2017) explored the challenges and opportunities, and their findings are also similar to my study, as they mentioned that the time and school environment play vital roles in making PBL more fruitful in EFL classrooms.
Conclusion
As the purpose of the study, the investment in students for the English subject increased at a satisfactory level. I wanted my students to spend at least an hour every day. However, some of them provided up to two to three hours, two weeks, and most of them gave an hour happily, although they used to give only five to twenty minutes. Similarly, they increased their efforts and invested money not only in reference materials but also invested time to consult the library. As a result, they performed better in the class, their handwriting improved, clarity and confidence increased, and they learnt collaborative skills to give and take help in the learning process. Although the project work was new and unique, and the previous trend was just a repetition of the course content in vacations, my students accepted the plan for project work easily after they observed some project works in videos. Not only during the project work but also in regular teaching, the technique (e.g., encouraging students to share their learning in the class as a task or a project) made students alert and prepared. This study will be helpful and a reference for those English language teachers who want to implement PBL in EFL classrooms to enhance learners’ active participation, and for language policy designers to revise the internal assessment guideline in the coming days. This study only presented the reflections of two project works, just for internal assessment and fostering learner investment, and further investigations can be conducted to integrate soft skills in the language learning process through project-based learning.
References
Acharya, S. (2023). Perceptions, practices, and challenges of applying project-based learning in health education.Journal of Education and Practice, 14(2), 112–121.
Aldabbus, S. (2018). Project-based learning: Possibilities and challenges in primary classrooms.International Journal of Education and Research, 6(4), 75–88.
Aubrey, S. (2021). Enhancing English language learner engagement through project-based learning.TESOL Quarterly, 55(3), 780–804.
Bastola, B. (2021). Project-based learning to develop problem-solving skills in English language classrooms.Journal of NELTA, 26(1–2), 45–58.
Beckett, G. H. (1999). Project-based instruction in a Canadian secondary school’s ESL classes: Goals and evaluations [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of British Columbia, Canada.
Burns, A. (2009). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge.
Curriculum Development Centre. (2019). National curriculum framework for school education. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
Curriculum Development Centre. (2021). Secondary level (Grades 9–10) English curriculum. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
Curriculum Development Centre. (2023). Internal evaluation guideline for school education. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2023). Investment and motivation in language learning: What’s the difference?. Language Teaching, 56(1), 29-40.
Devkota, B., Karki, R., & Shrestha, S. (2017). Challenges and possibilities of implementing project-based learning in EFL classrooms in Nepal.Journal of Education and Research, 7(1), 32–49.
Dhungana, A. (2025). Investigating the effectiveness and implementation challenges of project-based learning: A case study of public school teachers in Chitwan, Nepal. Journal of Balkumari College, 14(1), 89-96.
Dhungana, K. (2025). Effectiveness and implementation challenges of project-based learning in English language teaching.Nepal Journal of Language Education, 10(1), 15–28.
Gibbes, M., & Carson, L. (2014). Project-based language learning: Learners’ perspectives.Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 171–189.
Ginting, D. (2021). Student engagement and factors affecting active learning in English language teaching. Voices of English Language Education Society, 5(2), 215-228.
Giri, R. A. (2016). Project-based learning as a 21st-century approach in English language teaching.NELTA Journal, 21(1–2), 12–25.
Guslyakova, L., Kuznetsova, N., & Ivanova, E. (2021). Problems of implementing project-based learning in EFL classrooms.European Journal of Education Studies, 8(10), 34–46.
Joshi, D. R. (2024). Teachers’ experiential strategies for bridging writing proficiency gaps among secondary level students. Far Western Review, 2(2), 91-105.
Joshi, D. R. (2025). Exploring counselling-based pedagogy in EFL classrooms: Perceived values of English language teachers in Nepal. Far Western Journal of Education, 2, 57-73.
Karki, S. (2018). Effectiveness of project work in developing students’ speaking skills. Journal of NELTA, 23(1–2), 101–113.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer.
Maulina, M. (2024). Empowering English language learners through project-based learning for language proficiency.Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 66–78.
Mertler, C. A. (2019). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Nasir, M., & Dermawan, A. (2022). Enhancing learners’ participation and confidence through project-based learning in EFL contexts.Asian EFL Journal, 24(5), 90–104.
Rusli, M., Degeng, N. S., Setyosari, P., & Sulton. (2021). Peer teaching: Students teaching students to increase academic performance. Teaching Theology & Religion, 24(1), 17-27.
Sanchez, R. (2019). Effectiveness of project-based learning to improve students’ speaking skills.English Language Teaching Journal, 12(6), 123–134.
Saud, M.S., Aryal, S., & Sapkota, J.L. (2024). Student assessment in formal education: Nepali community school teachers’ perspectives. Prithvi Academic Journal, 7, 67-77.
Somani, R., & Rizvi, M. (2018). A comparative study of project-based and traditional approaches in English language teaching: A quasi-experimental design.International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 15–30.
Yuliani, S. (2017). Promoting learner autonomy through project-based learning in EFL classrooms.Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(2), 68–77.
Author’s Bio: Dev Ram Joshi is an English language teacher at Mahunyal Secondary School, Bhajani-1, Kailali and the MPhil scholar at Far Western University, Nepal. He has been teaching English at the secondary level for over ten years. His areas of research interest include language proficiency gaps, psycholinguistics, motivation, transformative pedagogy, learner empowerment, self-directed learning and professional development, ecosystem in language education, and ELT material development. He can be reached at teacherdrjoshi@gmail.com.
The integration of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has transformed educational practices worldwide, fostering innovative teaching and learning experiences (UNESCO, 2018). In developing countries like Nepal, however, ICT implementation remains uneven, particularly in rural community schools. Despite the government’s efforts to promote ICT in education through policies such as the School Sector Development Plan (SSDP, 2016–2023), the challenges in rural contexts continue to hinder its effective use. This study reflects on my personal and professional journey as both a learner and a teacher in Nepal’s community schools, focusing on the challenges of ICT implementation and the realities of the digital divide between rural and urban educational settings. I was born and raised in a rural village in Tanahun District, Nepal. My early education took place in a community school that lacked basic ICT infrastructure, including computers, projectors, and even electricity. Like many rural students, I completed my schooling without ever having seen or used a computer. My only exposure to ICT was through conversations among teachers, which made computers sound like distant, mysterious tools.
The lack of digital exposure during my schooling reflected a broader issue: Nepal’s rural-urban educational disparity, especially in access to technology. Several studies align with my own personal experience, whether as a student or a teacher in various schools. For example, a study by Joshi and Ayer (2024) found that most rural schools in Nepal still lack the infrastructure and training needed for ICT integration. Similarly, Phunyal (2024) reported that many community schools have computers but lack consistent electricity and internet facilities, making their use infrequent and symbolic rather than transformative. Similar challenges are echoed in Lomo et al. (2024) when they reported that insufficient funding, weak stakeholder support, training challenges, poor electricity and internet access, and high maintenance costs constrained head teachers’ efforts to support ICT integration in teaching and learning. It has been reported that teachers have poor ICT skills, schools have poor internet connectivity, and a lack of computers, which creates a significant challenge in its implications (Lamsal, 2022). This report aligns with my personal experience in using ICT in teaching and learning.
Transition to Higher Education and Exposure to ICT
After completing my School Leaving Certificate (SLC), I moved to Pokhara for higher education. I passed intermediate without seeing computer use in the teaching and learning process. However, this transition marked a turning point in my educational journey. While pursuing my Bachelor’s degree, I joined a computer institute and completed a basic computer course. I also began teaching in a private school, where I observed the effective use of ICT in classrooms. Students were taken to the computer lab for a computer class, as well as being taught the contents through ICT tools.
Teachers used projectors, digital content, and multimedia presentations, and I noticed how students were more engaged and motivated. Their enthusiasm contrasted sharply with my own schooling experience. This observation deepened my understanding of the digital divide, a term referring to the unequal access to technology across social, geographical, and economic boundaries (Van Dijk, J., 2020). However, even in higher education, the integration of ICT was limited. Most lecturers relied on traditional lecture methods, highlighting a systemic gap in technology adoption even at the tertiary level.
ICT in Higher Education: A Source of Inspiration
During my master’s degree at Tribhuvan University, I experienced technology-enhanced learning environments for the first time. Professors used laptops, projectors, and digital resources to teach English, which significantly enhanced classroom engagement. They utilised ICT tools in preparing teaching materials and presentation slides, and employed these tools to involve students in group work. The most exciting thing I experienced was that they provided project work that required students to use computers in reporting the work. The ICT use really brightened up the classroom, ended boredom, enhanced students’ participation, and allowed students to explore the world of knowledge using technology. These experiences reinforced my belief that ICT could revolutionise teaching and learning if properly implemented. It inspired me to become an ICT-oriented teacher who could bring innovation into classroom instruction.
Research supports this realisation. According to Pun (2013), the use of ICT in teaching English promotes learner autonomy, motivation, and language exposure beyond textbooks. Similarly, Adhikari (2022) emphasises that teachers’ attitudes and digital competence play crucial roles in the success of ICT integration. Furthermore, Paudel (2021) argued that teacher professional development programs must include digital literacy and pedagogical training to ensure the sustainable use of ICT in schools.
Encountering Realities as a Teacher in Rural Community Schools
My enthusiasm for using ICT faced harsh realities when I began teaching in a rural community school in Tanahun. The school lacked not only computers but also electricity. There was no internet connection, either. I had to depend on mobile data to connect to the internet. The mobile data was also poor. I was disappointed with the realities I confronted there at that time. I was just puzzled about how to integrate ICT in my real teaching without ICT tools at school. The classroom size was large. I had the responsibility of dealing with tech-savvy learners who were more interested in using technology in learning a language. I wanted to be a scuba diver, but the circumstances forced me to be helpless. There was also poor support from the administration in utilising ICT in teaching and learning. I talked to the head teacher and the SMC chairperson. They spoke of the financial challenges the school was facing. My colleagues were discussing the lack of opportunities for ICT training, despite their wishes. Only a few teachers are well-trained in ICT. I desperately wished for an appropriate policy at the local level to address the challenges of ICT implementation in the community school. My knowledge and training in ICT felt irrelevant in that context. Similarly, Rana (2018) and Paudel (2022) identify financial constraints, inadequate training, and the absence of institutional commitment as core barriers.
After four years, I was transferred to a secondary school at Bhimad, where the situation was slightly better; there were computers and projectors, but no internet connectivity and unreliable electricity. Moreover, most teachers were digitally illiterate. Even computer teachers conducted classes theoretically without hands-on practice. These challenges align with findings from Sharma (2020), who observed that many rural schools in Nepal possess ICT tools but lack effective usage due to insufficient training, irregular power supply, and a lack of maintenance support.
Current Teaching Experience and Continuing Challenges
Currently, I teach English at a community school in Tanahun. Despite my persistent efforts to integrate ICT tools into lessons, barriers remain. Limited resources, poor connectivity, and a lack of institutional support continue to restrict meaningful ICT use. I have maximised available tools, using personal mobile phones, recorded videos, and downloaded materials, but systematic integration remains out of reach.
This situation aligns with broader national findings that rural teachers face “second-order barriers”—attitudinal, skill-based, and policy-related constraints that prevent effective ICT use (Ertmer, 1999; Paudel, 2021). Dong, C. (2025) reported that teachers faced major obstacles in integrating ICT into their teaching, primarily because they lacked adequate ICT training and professional development Rana and Rana (2020) in the Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology observe that the implementation of ICT in rural Nepal is highly context-dependent, constrained by geography, socio-economic status, and policy support. The persistence of these issues reveals the urgent need for localised training, infrastructure investment, and policy follow-up. Their findings reinforce the idea that rural ICT integration requires systemic rather than individual-level solutions.
Reflections and Implications
My journey from a student deprived of ICT to a teacher striving for ICT integration reflects the systemic inequities in Nepal’s education system. The journey helped me come up with the idea of the challenges of ICT implementation and its corresponding measures. The lack of sufficient ICT resources, inadequate ICT-based training for teachers, inconsistent electricity supply, poor internet access, a lack of alternative sources of electricity, insufficient administrative support, and a lack of ICT skills are identified as the major challenges to the effective implementation of ICT in rural community schools in Nepal. It underscores that ICT implementation is not merely a technological challenge but a socio-economic and policy issue.
These various experiences helped me to develop the insights to minimise the challenges. Conducting regular ICT training for teachers, promoting digital literacy among students and teachers alike, and community and local government participation in ICT initiatives. Schools must search for financial resources, and stakeholders need to provide administrative and technical support to mitigate the challenges that emerge with the effort to integrate ICT in teaching and learning, particularly in rural community schools. The findings also triggered changes in the policy-making and implementation aspects to seek a solution to the challenges observed. The majority of teachers who have not had the opportunity to learn ICT skills need to be provided with training for proper implementation of ICT in the language classroom, and ultimately to transform the traditional way of teaching to the recent ICT-integrated teaching.
Therefore, policymakers and educational leaders must consider various factors, such as strengthening infrastructure (including electricity and internet access) in rural schools, conducting regular ICT training for teachers, promoting digital literacy among both students and teachers, and encouraging community and local government participation in ICT initiatives. Furthermore, the SMC chairperson and head teachers should share equal responsibility for adopting technology in classroom teaching and learning. The teachers also need to be aware that the use of technology enhances the learning outcome, meeting the goal of quality education. Additionally, various tiers of government need to collaborate to address the challenges of implementing ICT in education. These governments need to formulate an appropriate IT policy and equally emphasise the implementation part. Moreover, these governments need to allocate a budget for infrastructural development and the management of ICT tools in schools. As UNESCO (2023) notes, equitable access to ICT is a key driver of inclusive and quality education. Without addressing the underlying barriers, the digital divide will continue to widen.
Conclusion
This reflective account highlights that ICT integration in rural community schools of Nepal remains a significant challenge despite policy intentions and teachers’ enthusiasm. The author’s experiences mirror those of many rural educators who aspire to innovate but are constrained by contextual limitations. Bridging this gap requires more than distributing devices; it demands sustained commitment to infrastructure development, teacher professional development, and community engagement. Only then can ICT truly transform education in rural Nepal.
References
Acharya, C. P. (2014). Use of ICT/Web tools in ELT in Nepal. Journal of NELTA, 19(1–2), 1–13.
Dong, C., Ji, H., Yang, T., Wu, H., Liu, C., Xie, X., … & Zhang, X. (2025). Janus Adsorption of Polar Ion Hubs for Simultaneous Regulation of Zinc Deposition Kinetics and Interfacial Stability in Long‐Cycle Aqueous Zinc‐Ion Batteries. Advanced Functional Materials, e13529. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202513529
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02299597
Joshi, K. R., & Ayer, R. (2024). Teachers’ experiences and challenges of integrating ICTs in English language classrooms in rural schools of Nepal. Journal of NELTA Gandaki, 7(1–2).
Lamsal, H. L. (2022). Exploring challenges and opportunities of remote teaching at Nepalese community secondary schools during the COVID-19 pandemic. Utamax: Journal of Ultimate Research and Trends in Education, 4(1), 29-38.
Lomo, D. A., Abonyi, U. K., & Ahwireng, D. (2024). Headteachers’ support and challenges toward ICT integration into teaching and learning in Ghanaian Basic schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 24(2), 330–345.
Maski Rana, K. (2018). ICT in rural primary schools in Nepal: Context and teachers’ experiences. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Canterbury).
Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2019). Education in Figures 2019. Government of Nepal.
Paudel, P. (2021). ICT integration in community schools of Nepal: Opportunities and barriers. Journal of Education and Social Studies, 4(1), 56–67.
Pun, M. (2013). The use of multimedia technology in English language teaching: A global perspective. Crossing the Border. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 1(1), 29–38.
Rana, K., & Rana, K. (2020). ICT in rural primary schools in Nepal: Context and teachers’ experiences. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(1), 36–53.
Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Ertmer, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575.
UNESCO. (2018). ICT Competency Framework for Teachers (Version 3).
UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in Education. Paris: UNESCO.
Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. John Wiley & Sons.
Author’ Bio: Mr. Janak Sigdel is an English teacher at Chandra Jyoti Secondary School, Ghirhing, Tanahun. He is the Roster Trainer of the Education Training Centre, Gandaki Province. Currently, he is pursuing an MPhil from Nepal Open University. He can be reached at schoolchandrajyoti31@gmail.com.
Teacher professional development (TPD) in English language teaching plays a vital role in enhancing instructional quality, equipping educators to navigate pedagogical shifts shaped by globalisation, technological change, and diverse learner needs. In Nepal, however, TPD is often approached as a formality rather than a transformative process. Reflecting on my own journey as an ELT professional in Nepal, I have observed how many initiatives fail to address the practical challenges teachers face, particularly in rural, multilingual, and under-resourced settings. Workshops tend to be centralised, top-down, and theory-heavy, lacking follow-up mechanisms, teacher agency, or contextual sensitivity. Moreover, many educators participate passively, with limited motivation or incentives to translate PD programmes into meaningful classroom practices. These experiences have led me to question the prevailing assumptions about professional development and the disconnect between policy rhetoric and actual teacher empowerment.
Critically analysing this situation through the lenses of Self-Determination Theory and Vygotsky’s Social Interaction Theory, it becomes clear that sustainable TPD must foster autonomy, competence, and collaborative growth. Teachers thrive when they are seen as active agents of change rather than passive recipients of PD programmes (Vygotsky, 1978; Ryan & Deci, 2017). Looking at successful models from countries like Finland and Singapore, one finds strong institutional support, continuous mentorship, and an ingrained culture of reflective practice, all of which are largely absent in Nepal (Paudel, 2019). These countries prioritise teacher voice, build trust, and tailor PD programmes to school contexts, contrasting sharply with Nepal’s fragmented and compliance-oriented system. Therefore, for Nepal to strengthen its ELT landscape, it must rethink its approach to TPD, grounding it in teachers’ lived realities, engaging stakeholders at all levels, and investing in long-term structures that value teacher learning as a continuous, context-driven, and collaborative process.
The Lived Experience of a Language Educator in Nepal
My professional journey in English Language Teaching, which began in 2009 at Darchula Multiple Campus in Far Western Nepal, has been marked by moments of hesitation, discovery, and continuous growth. Initially uncertain about teaching, I gradually developed a deep passion for the field, fueled by positive student engagement, satisfaction and appreciation. As I advanced through B.Ed., M.Ed., MPhil and PhD programmes in English Language Education, I began to view teaching not just as content delivery, but also as a reflective and learner-centred process. These academic pursuits expanded my understanding of critical pedagogy, curriculum design, and classroom dynamics, encouraging me to question traditional practices and embrace innovation in teaching. Reflective practice, in particular, became central to my pedagogical identity, prompting me to consistently analyse and refine my methods based on learner feedback, context, and theoretical grounding.
Critically reflecting on my participation in various teacher professional development programmes, I recognise how certain experiences significantly shaped my professional outlook. A workshop at Far Western University on reflective practice and professional ethics, for instance, challenged me to reconsider my assumptions about teacher identity and responsibility. An online course from Arizona State University introduced me to curriculum evaluation frameworks and the concept of communities of practice (Wenger, 1998), emphasising collaboration and shared learning among educators. These initiatives illustrated the power of contextually relevant, participatory TPD. The COVID-19 pandemic brought another critical learning opportunity: when I led a Microsoft Teams training for faculty, it became apparent that many colleagues lacked digital competencies. This revealed a broader institutional gap in ICT readiness and highlighted the urgent need for systemic support in digital literacy. Such experiences not only broadened my understanding of ELT in Nepal but also sharpened my belief that effective TPD must be reflective, responsive, and rooted in the real challenges teachers face.
Critical Reflection and Theoretical Evaluation
The persistent underdevelopment of teacher professional development in Nepal reveals deeply entrenched structural challenges that continue to hinder quality education, particularly in English Language Teaching. Most TPD programmes in Nepal are designed and delivered through a top-down, standardised approach that disregards the diverse and context-specific realities of teachers, especially those in rural and marginalised regions (Borg, 2015). In my own teaching context, institutional limitations such as a lack of high-speed internet access, digital tools, and sufficient ICT infrastructure severely constrain innovative practices and hinder access to professional learning resources. Moreover, TPD initiatives are often conducted as one-off workshops, functioning more as bureaucratic formalities than transformative learning experiences. This tokenistic approach has prevented TPD from becoming a sustained, reflective, and embedded part of the teaching culture. Without long-term follow-up, mentorship, or collaborative platforms, teachers are left isolated in their pursuit of pedagogical improvement.
Reflecting on my own professional experiences, I find strong resonance with Schön’s (1983) concept of the reflective practitioner, which underscores the importance of learning through reflection-in-action and reflection-on-action. My practice of writing reflective journals after classes has evolved into a key professional habit, helping me to self-evaluate and adjust instructional strategies based on student responses and emerging challenges. Brookfield’s four lenses of critical reflection, such as autobiographical experiences, students’ perspectives, peer observations, and theoretical knowledge, have guided me in adopting a more holistic, evidence-informed approach to teaching. In the absence of robust institutional support, I relied heavily on self-directed learning through YouTube, MOOCs, webinars, and online communities, which served as vital metacognitive tools in my growth. Drawing on Deci and Ryan’s Self-Determination Theory, I recognise that my sustained motivation stemmed from a sense of autonomy, growing competence, and meaningful connections with like-minded educators. These experiences highlight not only the gaps in Nepal’s TPD ecosystem but also the power of teacher agency and intrinsic motivation in driving professional transformation.
Socio-Educational Relevance in Nepal’s Current Context
Nepal’s educational system, particularly in its rural and remote regions, remains heavily burdened by systemic challenges such as teacher isolation, lack of mentorship, and limited access to current academic resources. These issues are compounded by the digital divide, financial constraints, and bureaucratic red tape, which collectively stifle innovation and professional growth (Saud, 2023). In my own teaching experience, I have observed that even the most motivated and competent teachers often become disillusioned due to inadequate institutional support and rigid administrative structures. For example, teachers eager to integrate technology or apply new pedagogies frequently encounter logistical obstacles such as insufficient budgets, unreliable internet, or delayed bureaucratic approvals. This reinforces a cycle of stagnation, where meaningful reform is constantly deferred.
Despite these challenges, the enthusiasm among educators to engage in professional development remains palpable. During a Microsoft Teams training session I facilitated, I witnessed firsthand the eagerness of colleagues to enhance their digital literacy and pedagogical skills, an experience that underscored the untapped potential that exists when support structures are made accessible. This calls for the urgent design of responsive, contextually grounded TPD programmes that incorporate blended learning, modular flexibility, and collaborative learning communities such as peer-led reflective practice groups. Additionally, Nepal’s shift to a federal governance structure presents a valuable opportunity to decentralise TPD initiatives. If provincial governments, universities, and local education commissions can collaborate to tailor TPD efforts to local needs, while integrating global best practices and honouring indigenous knowledge systems and multilingual realities, then the quality and relevance of ELT in Nepal can be significantly enhanced.
Comparative Insights: Learning from Developed Countries
Countries like Finland and Singapore offer powerful counterpoints to Nepal’s underdeveloped TPD landscape, each providing distinct yet transferable lessons. Finland’s model emphasises deep professional trust, autonomy, and research-based practice. Teachers are required to hold a master’s degree, and professional development is seamlessly integrated into their weekly workload through collaborative inquiry and action research. This system nurtures a culture of intrinsic motivation, critical reflection, and lifelong learning, values that resonate with my own evolving understanding of professional development as a reflective and context-driven process. The Finnish model demonstrates that when teachers are viewed as intellectuals and collaborators rather than mere implementers of top-down directives, sustainable educational transformation becomes possible.
In contrast, Singapore exemplifies a highly structured, systematised, and well-funded approach to teacher professional development. Its centralised body, the Academy of Singapore Teachers, ensures coherence, quality control, and equitable access to TPD opportunities. Regular teacher appraisals, clear career progression pathways, and targeted ICT training reflect a deliberate alignment between policy, infrastructure, and pedagogy. Although Nepal cannot replicate either model wholesale due to differing socio-economic and political realities, strategic adaptations are feasible. Encouraging teacher-led inquiry projects, akin to Finland’s reflective autonomy, could empower local educators within their own contexts. Similarly, establishing a national TPD coordination body under Nepal’s Ministry of Education, inspired by Singapore, could ensure consistent funding, monitoring, and support. Finally, both models underscore the necessity of investing in localised digital infrastructure and content, steps Nepal must prioritise to bridge the rural-urban divide and foster equitable teacher growth across the country.
Recommendations for Key Stakeholders
Reflecting critically on Nepal’s current educational challenges, it is clear that the government and policymakers must take a proactive and sustained role in transforming teacher professional development. Allocating at least 5% of the education budget specifically for TPD, including investments in digital tools and training, would signify a much-needed commitment to educators’ growth. Context-sensitive and continuous PD programs, with annual evaluations, are essential to ensure relevance and effectiveness rather than one-off workshops. Establishing regional TPD centres with training-of-trainers models can decentralise professional learning and tailor it to local needs, especially in rural areas. Moreover, providing travel grants and funding for teachers to attend national and international forums will foster exposure to global best practices and motivate educators to innovate. Without such systemic support, TPD risks remaining fragmented and ineffective.
At the institutional and community levels, educational leaders and teachers must embed reflective practice into daily routines through learning journals, peer reviews, and action research. These strategies cultivate a culture of self-awareness, collaboration, and continuous improvement. Teacher mentorship and co-teaching initiatives can further strengthen professional support networks, while promoting ICT literacy as a core competency is vital in today’s digitally driven world. Developing signature pedagogies like post-class reflection writing not only enhances teacher effectiveness but models lifelong learning for students. Parents and students also play a critical role; their recognition of teachers’ efforts and active collaboration in assessing learning needs can build stronger school communities. Encouraging students to engage in reflective learning, research, and publication under mentorship nurtures a culture of inquiry from early stages. Finally, the broader citizenry, including civil society and media, must advocate for teacher rights and celebrate educational excellence publicly. Partnerships with national and international institutions and cooperatives can provide practical support to school and university infrastructure and TPD programs, ensuring that education reform is a shared societal endeavour rather than a solitary institutional responsibility.
Reimagining TPD for Stronger Nepal
Teacher professional development extends far beyond conventional training sessions; it embodies a profound moral, social, and intellectual commitment to fostering educational equity and excellence. Reflecting on my own journey, shaped by relentless self-directed learning, engagement with institutional initiatives, and the inspiration drawn from students, I have come to appreciate the transformative potential of continuous, reflective development. However, the path is fraught with significant challenges: scarce resources, fragmented policies, and a lack of systemic coordination often undermine the effectiveness of TPD efforts. These obstacles, though daunting, highlight the critical need for a more coherent, well-supported approach that recognises teachers not merely as implementers but as key agents of educational change and innovation.
Nepal’s current educational landscape reveals that the nation stands at a pivotal crossroads. By thoughtfully integrating local aspirations with global best practices and by prioritising teacher agency, collaboration, and contextual relevance, Nepal has the opportunity to fundamentally reimagine and revitalise its TPD framework. A strong national commitment to teacher growth, one that genuinely honours educators’ contributions and equips them with essential 21st-century skills, is urgently needed. Such an approach would not only enhance English language teaching but also catalyse broader educational transformation, positioning education as a driving force for social and economic development. Only through sustained investment in teacher empowerment can Nepal unlock the full potential of its learners and foster equitable progress across all regions of the country.
References
Acharya, B. (2025). Teachers’ perceptions toward teaching-learning pedagogy and professional development: Insights from Nepal. Acta Educationis Generalis, 15(1).
Borg, S. (2015). Overview-Beyond the workshop: CPD for English language teachers. Professional development for English language teachers: Perspectives from higher education in Turkey. British Council.
Paudel, P. (2019). Learning strategies employed in the English language: Perceptions and practices. Journal of NELTA Gandaki, 1, 87–99.
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press.
Saud, D.S. (2023). English language teacher professional development: Teacher educators’ perceptions and experiences. Bodhi: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 114-135.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Author’s Bio: Mr. Dammar Singh Saud is an Assistant Professor of English Language Education at Far Western University. He holds an MA, MEd, and MPhil in ELT and is now pursuing a PhD in TESOL. His research focuses on ELT pedagogy, ICT integration, teacher professional development, and translanguaging practices. An active scholar, he has reviewed articles for peer-reviewed journals and serves as the editor of Exploration and IELTA Nepal’s online magazine. Saud has presented papers at international conferences, contributing to global discussions on English language teaching and fostering innovation in the field. His academic work reflects a dedication to advancing research and practice in ELT. He can be reached at dammarsaud68@gmail.com.
Teaching English in a linguistically diverse classroom presents a complex challenge, particularly in a multilingual context like Nepal, where students bring with them rich linguistic backgrounds from their homes and communities. I teach at Sharada Secondary School, a community school located in Itahari, Sunsari. Since 2022, I have been working with students from various ethno-linguistic backgrounds, including Tharu, Rai, Limbu, Maithili, and Nepali. Reflecting on my experience of teaching English in such a diverse setting, I initially employed an English-only approach as the medium of instruction, instituting rules that enforced speaking only English in the classroom. I felt a sense of satisfaction as the class remained silent. However, after some time, I began to realize that the students’ silence and passivity were not conducive to effective learning. This reflection prompted me to adopt more reflective practices, which are essential for teachers’ professional growth and for addressing the everyday challenges that arise in teaching (Rauteda, 2024b).
The disengagement of my students became a significant concern for me. I encountered numerous challenges during class, particularly regarding student motivation and engagement. I observed that many students were hesitant to speak, fearful of making mistakes, and often remained passive throughout the lessons. This situation forced me to reflect critically on my teaching methods and seek alternative pedagogical approaches. Consequently, I adopted translanguaging as an intervention in the classroom—an approach that allows students to utilize their full linguistic repertoire in the learning process (Gaarcia & Wei, 2014; Phyak, 2018; Rauteda, 2022; 2024a). This reflective writing aims to provide an in-depth analysis of a moment when my teaching successfully engaged the majority of my students through a planned intervention using translanguaging pedagogy within a PAR framework. In this discussion, I outlined what I did, what the students did, and the reasons I believe the lesson was effective, supported by theoretical insights and research findings.
The Problem Identified: A Disengaged and Struggling Classroom
At the beginning of my career, I worked at private colleges in the Kathmandu Valley, where monolingual instruction was preferred in ELT classrooms. This practice shaped my teaching habits. After passing the Teacher Service Commission (TSC) examination, I became a permanent teacher at a government school, where I attempted to apply the methods I had previously used in private colleges. Initially, my English classes were dominated by monolingual practices, focusing solely on English instruction, as dictated by the traditional curriculum. However, I quickly noticed that my students were hesitant to participate. Even basic questions often went unanswered. Their lack of confidence and visible anxiety toward English created a barrier to meaningful engagement. I found my students completely silent in the classroom. Despite using various materials such as pictures, slides, and English-language videos, the students remained passive and showed little interest. I then realized that this silence was a result of implementing a monolingual instructional approach in a multilingual setting. In this context, Garcia and Wei (2014) argue that monolingual methods in multilingual environments can alienate learners and limit their ability to express their understanding.
The students’ silence, lack of participation, and poor writing skills indicated a need for change. I realized that their home languages were being ignored in the classroom, causing English to feel disconnected from their everyday lives. As a teacher in a multilingual community, this contradiction deeply troubled me. One day, I asked my learners in the Nepali language why they remained silent in my class. They explained that they did not understand the language I used during lessons. The majority of them requested that I incorporate both Nepali and English in the classroom to enhance their understanding. Consequently, their demands and my realizations prompted me to seek alternative ways of teaching English in a multilingual context. This led me to consider translanguaging pedagogy through participatory action research (PAR).
Planning for Change: Participatory Action Research as a Tool
In response to students’ disengagement and lack of motivation, I chose to conduct action research within my ELT classroom to address the identified issues. I made this decision with the belief that action research provides practical solutions to everyday challenges and fosters professional growth for teachers (Rauteda, 2025a). Subsequently, I planned to implement PAR, which is a cyclical process comprising planning, acting, observing, and reflecting (Cohen et al., 2018). PAR allowed me to include my students as co-participants in the learning process. I designed a translanguaging-based intervention that enabled students to utilize their full linguistic repertoires (Garcia, 2009; Rauteda, 2022). According to Garcia and Wei (2014), translanguaging involves deploying students’ complete linguistic abilities without strictly adhering to the boundaries typically associated with named languages (national and state languages). Based on the benefits of using hybrid language practices in ELT classrooms, I aimed to employ translingual practices to create space for students’ home languages in the learning environment. Through PAR, I sought to transform my pedagogical approach by engaging students in a culturally and linguistically responsive manner. Additionally, my goal was to enhance student engagement in classroom activities through empowerment, while also seeking pedagogical empowerment for myself.
Conceptual Understanding of Translanguaging
Translanguaging is a language practice used by bilingual and multilingual speakers, wherein individuals naturally, dynamically, and purposefully utilize various languages and linguistic resources simultaneously (Garcia, 2009). This concept was first developed by Cen Williams in 1994, who created opportunities for students to alternate languages in their reading and writing, as well as in their receptive and productive skills (Garcia & Leiva, 2014). Translanguaging refers to the intentional mixing of different languages (Rauteda, 2024a). As Garcia (2009) notes, translanguaging involves the use of multiple linguistic practices by bilingual individuals to navigate their bilingual environments. Multilingual speakers can fluidly transition between languages, viewing their linguistic repertoire as a cohesive system (Canagarajah, 2011). Scholars have referred to translanguaging using various terms, including ‘polylingualism’ (Jorgenson, 2008), ‘metrolingualism’ (Pennycook, 2010), ‘codemeshing’ (Canagarajah, 2011), and ‘pluriliteracy’ (Garcia, 2009). From a language use perspective, translanguaging is a flexible and strategic approach that employs multiple languages (Garcia & Wei, 2014). This approach can assist students in developing both their cognitive and socio-emotional skills while leveraging the diverse and dynamic language practices of learners (Garcia & Kleyn, 2016; Vogel & Garcia, 2017). Consequently, translanguaging serves as a valuable practice for multilingual learners, addressing diversity in the classroom and promoting social justice by maximizing the use of each learner’s linguistic repertoire. It can also empower disadvantaged students who face barriers solely due to language differences. Moreover, Li Wei (2011) introduces the concept of a “translanguaging space,” which serves as a framework illustrating the setting in which students can utilize all their linguistic, cultural, and epistemic assets in the learning process. In my classroom, instead of separating languages, I embraced them as complementary resources. I encouraged students to use languages they are familiar with, such as Tharu, Maithili, Limbu, or Nepali, to express their thoughts, scaffold their learning, and produce creative outputs.
Implementing Translanguaging Pedagogy
As a teacher-researcher, I implemented translanguaging using various strategies at different stages. In the following sections, I present details on how I enacted translanguaging within a PAR framework, the impact of this intervention on my teaching, and what the intervention achieved. This information is organized into themes and subthemes.
Designing the Activity
I designed an activity focused on creating or collecting stories in the languages that students are proficient in. The purpose of this activity was to enhance their writing skills, encourage interaction, and appreciate local knowledge. Additionally, it aimed to promote co-learning and bridge the gap between the classroom, content, and community.
For this task, I divided the class into eight heterogeneous groups, mixing students from different language backgrounds. This grouping encouraged peer learning and cross-cultural dialogue. Each group created and collected stories in their preferred languages. They then presented these stories in the classroom and discussed them among group members. After the discussions, the stories were translated into multiple languages, including Tharu, Nepali, English, and Rai. Finally, the stories were compiled and presented as multilingual, multimodal storybooks. As a post-method teacher, I aimed to theorize my practice and apply theoretical concepts, using these activities to scaffold my students’ learning. I wanted to connect them with their culture, language, and community. Consequently, this activity aligned with Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory, particularly the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), which emphasizes the importance of social interaction and scaffolding in learning (Vygotsky, 1978).
What the Students Were Doing
Students engaged in various activities both individually and in groups. They created and collected stories, participated in discussions, made presentations, translated texts, transformed stories into multimodal formats, and even organized them into a book. Their involvement in these activities led to significant changes in their behavior and attitudes. The intervention fostered collaboration, cooperation, engagement, and motivation among the students, helping them develop a sense of agency (Rauteda, 2022; 2024; Rauteda & Luitel, 2025; Rauteda, 2025b). Moreover, this experience transformed the students’ behavior. Those who had previously remained silent became active participants, displaying excitement while collecting stories from elders in their communities. Sharing these stories in class instilled a sense of pride in them. They began to view their languages and cultures not as obstacles but as bridges to learning English. In their groups, students discussed word choices, translated idioms, and assisted one another in crafting coherent narratives. The classroom evolved into a lively, collaborative space filled with energy and multilingual dialogue. Students not only practiced English but also enhanced their thinking, reading, and writing skills.
What I Was Doing as a Teacher
As a teacher, I shifted my role from the sole authority to a facilitator and co-learner. I moved around the groups, providing language support, answering questions, and encouraging dialogue. I praised their efforts in both languages and emphasized the value of their home languages. Instead of correcting every mistake, I focused on meaning-making and creative expression. I also created space for students to present their stories to the whole class, which boosted their confidence. This student-centered pedagogy reflects Freire’s concept of dialogic education (Freire, 1970), where learning emerges through mutual dialogue and respect.
Classroom Outcomes of Translanguaging Pedagogy through PAR
The primary objective of implementing this pedagogical strategy was to enhance student engagement in ELT classrooms and to develop students’ writing proficiency in English. The integration of translanguaging pedagogy within a PAR framework proved to be particularly effective in a multilingual and culturally diverse classroom. This approach not only supported students’ linguistic and academic growth but also improved classroom management by fostering greater learner participation, collaboration, and empowerment. Through this intervention, students were encouraged to draw upon their full linguistic repertoires, which made learning more inclusive, dynamic, and responsive to their lived experiences. The following sub-sections illustrate the transformative outcomes of this pedagogical approach, highlighting how translanguaging through PAR contributed to culturally and linguistically responsive teaching, enhanced literacy and language development, increased learner agency, and strengthened classroom relationships.
Culturally and Linguistically Responsive Pedagogy
Teaching is more effective when it is closely connected to culture and language. Research studies (Garcia & Wei, 2014; Phyak, 2023; Rauteda, 2022) have shown that language instruction is most effective when linguistic and cultural diversity are celebrated and respected in the classroom. Furthermore, these practices can lead to increased engagement, motivation, and academic achievement (Gay, 2010). During the project, the students worked on local phenomena. They wrote, collected, and translated stories from their local context and even used their home language. This practice helped them connect with their culture. By validating cultural norms and local languages, I was able to teach in a culturally and linguistically responsive way. It fostered the students’ identities and made them proud of their culture and language, which boosted their confidence. Throughout the project, the students became more motivated and confident, and they developed a more positive attitude towards their learning. By integrating home languages into the classroom, I created a safe space where students felt seen, respected, and capable. Thus, translanguaging enabled me to be accountable to local culture and language, enhancing my students’ engagement and motivation in the classroom.
Enhanced Literacy and Language Skills
The intervention significantly enhanced both literacy and language skills among the students. Through activities such as storytelling, translation, and group discussions, students cultivated a range of literacies. They learned to navigate between languages, structure narratives, and articulate complex ideas. This aligns with Hornberger’s (2003) “Continua of biliteracy” model, which advocates for literacy development across diverse languages and modalities. Furthermore, as students engaged in tasks like searching for equivalent words in online dictionaries and Google, they also improved their digital literacy. Ultimately, they became more familiar with the structure and organization of books. This experience demonstrates that involving students in multilingual activities can effectively foster both language skills and digital literacy.
Increased Participation and Agency
Agency refers to an individual’s capacity to act, initiate actions, self-regulate, or effect change in their circumstances. It can also be viewed as a form of resistance (Giddens, 1984; Ortner, 1984). Additionally, agency encompasses an individual’s ability to apply principles or theories in specific contexts. In this case, the intervention served to enhance the agency of both the teacher and the students, as they challenged the monolingual instruction and enacted micro-level resistance in the classroom through translanguaging (Rauteda & Luitel, 2025). Moreover, the students assumed greater ownership of their learning. Group work fostered accountability and collaboration, empowering them to become autonomous learners willing to take risks in their education. Consequently, they developed a stronger connection with each other and the classroom environment. Their engagement increased as they transitioned from passive recipients of knowledge to active creators of knowledge.
Building Relationships
Establishing a good rapport is crucial for effective teaching and learning. In my research, the intervention played a significant role in fostering positive relationships between the teacher and students, as well as among the learners themselves. The activities allowed me to connect with my students on a deeper level, enabling me to learn about their lives, traditions, and communication styles. This emotional connection not only built trust, which is vital for successful learning, but also encouraged students to share personal experiences, which has proven beneficial for their psychological well-being. As they began to support one another, share ideas, and collaborate, they expressed a preference for group work as part of their assignments. As a result, teaching became more effective, promoting linguistic inclusivity, collaborative learning, real-world applications, a redefined role for teachers and students, and opportunities for creative expression.
Conclusion
This reflective narrative demonstrates how the implementation of translanguaging pedagogy within a PAR framework significantly enhanced learner engagement in a multilingual English classroom. By integrating students’ home languages alongside English, I was able to create a culturally responsive environment where learners felt valued, confident, and motivated. The intervention not only promoted active participation, literacy development, and student agency but also transformed my own role from a traditional authority figure to a facilitator and co-learner.
The experience reveals several key insights. First, monolingual approaches can silence learners in linguistically diverse classrooms, whereas translanguaging affirms students’ linguistic and cultural identities. Second, translanguaging fosters collaboration and mutual respect, enabling learners to connect classroom activities with the knowledge they bring from their communities. Third, these practices contribute to broader educational goals by promoting equity and social justice in language teaching.
For teachers in similar contexts, this reflection suggests that translanguaging can serve as a potent pedagogical tool for bridging gaps between students’ lived experiences and classroom learning. Although this account is based on a specific classroom experience, it emphasizes the importance of embracing multilingual resources in ELT. Future reflective and research-based studies could further explore how translanguaging can be systematically integrated into classroom practices across Nepal.
References
Canagarajah, S. (2011). Translanguaging in the classroom: Emerging issues for research and pedagogy. Applied Linguistics Review, 2(1), 1–28.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. Routledge.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Herder and Herder.
Garcia, O. & Leiva, C. (2014). Theorizing and enacting translanguaging for social justice. In Blackledge, A., & Creese, A. (eds.), Heteroglossia as practice and pedagogy (pp. 199-216). Springer.
García, O. (2009). Bilingual education for the 21st century: A global perspective. Wiley Black-Well.
Garcia, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. Palgrave Macmillan.
Garcia, O., and Kleyn, T. (2016). Translanguaging theory in education. In O. Garcia and T. Kleyn (eds), Translanguaging with multilingual students, (pp. 23–47). Routledge.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
Giddens, A. (1984). Constitution of society polity press. Cambridge.
Hornberger, N. H. (2003). Continua of biliteracy. Multilingual Matters.
Jorgensen, J. N. (2008). Polylingual languaging around and among children and adolescents. International Journal of Multilingualism, 5(3), 161–176.
Li, W. (2011). Moment analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(5), 1222-1235.
Ortner, S. B. (1984). Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26(1), 126-166.
Pennycook, A. 2010. Language as a local practice. Routledge.
Phyak, P. (2018). Translanguaging as a pedagogical resource in English language teaching: A response to unplanned language education policies in Nepal. In K. Kuchah & F. Shamim (Eds.), International Perspectives in Teaching English in Difficult Circumstances (pp. 49-70). Palgrave.
Phyak, P. (2023). Translanguaging as a space of simultaneity: theorizing translanguaging pedagogies in English medium schools from a spatial perspective. Modern Language Journal, 107(1), 289-307.
Rauteda, K. R. (2022). Translanguaging as a pedagogical resource in multilingual ELT classrooms: Exploring perceptions and practices [Master’s Thesis]. Tribhuvan University.
Rauteda, K. R. (2024a). Unveiling pedagogical translanguaging: Investigating teachers’ translingual practices and purposes in ELT classrooms. English Language Teaching Perspectives, 9(1-2), 51–66.
Rauteda, K. R. (2024b). Bending back to the professional activities: Unveiling the role of reflective practice in teachers’ professional development. Journal of NELTA Gandaki, 7(1-2), 98–110.
Rauteda, K. R. (2025a). English language teachers’ knowledge, use, and perceived effectiveness of action research for professional development. Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS), 11(1), 39-52.
Rauteda, K. R. (2025b). Translanguaging for transformation: Identity, equity, and pedagogical resistance in Nepalese ELT classrooms. Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS), 11(2), 150-162.
Rauteda, K. R., & Luitel, B. (2025). Teachers’ pedagogical resistance of EMI through classroom translanguaging in Nepalese science classrooms. IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching), 9(2), 441-456.
Vogel, S., & García, O. (2017). Translanguaging. In G. Noblit & L. Moll (Eds.). Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Author’s Bio: Mr. Khem Raj Rauteda is an MPhil scholar at the Graduate School of Education, Tribhuvan University, and a Lecturer of English Education at Janta Multiple Campus, Itahari. He has been actively involved in academic publishing for over five years, contributing research articles to both national and international journals. Rauteda has also served as a reviewer for several scholarly publications and has presented numerous papers at national and international conferences. His areas of interest are Translanguaging, CDA, Multilingualism, and Teachers’ Professional Development. He can be reached at krauteda@gmail.com.
We are pleased to announce the release of the Anniversary Issue of ELT Choutari (March- May 2025). This issue presents a collection of reflective accounts from English language teachers and practitioners, offering diverse perspectives on teaching, learning, and research. The contributions explore the transformative power of reading, the evolution of pedagogical practices, the integration of AI tools in academic writing, and the application of the 7E instructional model in the language classroom. Collectively, these reflections underscore the significance of innovation, adaptability, and critical reflection in enhancing educational practices and learner engagement.
As language teachers, we devote a large portion of our time to planning lessons, designing material, evaluating students’ progress, and attending to the various needs of our pupils. However, writing, a critical tool for our personal and professional development, frequently remains overlooked during these hectic routines. For educators, writing is more than just a scholarly endeavour. It serves as a tool for reflection, professional growth, and engagement in the broader discourse outside classrooms. It is because we are documenting our experiences and making sense of our pedagogical decisions, our classroom difficulties, and our evolving identities.
Unlike previous issues, this is a generic issue which features reflections by influential ELT experts, researchers. and teachers. We hope their experiences and anecdotes will benefit our esteemed readers.
In a conversation with Chandra Bhadur Lama, Dr. Bal Ram Adhikari sketches out how reading was important in his personal and professional growth. Connecting his personal experiences, he highlights the importance and benefits of reading for a language learner. Building on his reflections, he argues that viewing reading solely as a receptive skill is a limited and often misguided perception. He emphasises the importance of redefining reading as an active, interpretive process. Furthermore, he advocates for a shift from explanatory to explorative reading, proposing several strategies to foster deeper engagement and critical thinking in the reading process.
Dr. Narendra Raj Paneru, in his article, reflects on his English language teaching and learning journey. He reveals his memories of learning English in three phases: learning shaped by memorisation and punishment during schooling, mechanical learning in higher education, and eventually the realisation that teaching is not merely conveying information but rather communicating the essence of a topic in the language that resonates with students. Reflecting on his personal and professional experiences, he sketches out a picture of a paradigm shift from chalkboards to clicks.
Similarly, Saban Kumar K.C. highlights the importance of AI tools in research and academic writing. Drawing instances from his thesis-writing journey, he sketches out how AI tools like ChatGPT, QuillBot, and Grammarly prove to be good research assistants in various phases of research planning, execution, and reporting. He also points to the pros and cons of using AI and recommends the way forward.
Likewise, Mr. Sagar Parajuli reflects on the 7E instructional model while teaching the story Treasure in the Forest, highlighting how it enhanced student engagement, critical thinking, and creativity in the English language classroom. Despite challenges like time constraints, linguistic barriers, and evaluation misalignment, the model fostered a more inclusive and student-centred learning environment. The experience reaffirmed the importance of reflective teaching and adaptive lesson planning for meaningful language learning.
For your convenience, here are the hyperlinks to the blog posts:
Lastly, we extend heartfelt gratitude to our co-editor, Ganesh Kumar Bastola, and all our editors and reviewers—Jeevan Karki, Mohan Singh Saud, Dr. Nani Babu Ghimire, Dr. Jnanu Raj Poudel, Sagar Poudel, Binod Duwadi, Puskar Chaudhary, Yadu Gnawali, and Dasharath Rai—for their dedicated efforts in bringing this issue to completion.
ELT Choutari is a platform for researchers, scholars, educators, and practitioners to share insights, practices, and narratives from classrooms and communities. We invite you to contribute to our upcoming first quarterly issue (June-August 2025) by submitting your articles and blogs to 2elt.choutari@gmail.com.
If you find value in the interviews, articles, and reflective pieces, please share them within your circles and feel free to leave your comments below each piece.
We are delighted to announce the release of the Third quarterly edition of ELT Choutari (October-December 2024), dedicated as a special issue focusing on “Mother Tongue Based Multilingual Education Policies Practices and Research Nepal.”
Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE) in Nepal is grounded in the belief that students learn best in their native language, which enhances cognitive development and academic success. Introduced after Nepal’s democratic transition in 1990, MTB-MLE aims to preserve linguistic diversity while improving educational outcomes for children from various ethnic and language backgrounds. Despite strong policy frameworks supporting MTB-MLE, its implementation has faced challenges, including limited resources, teacher training, and community resistance. The policy’s success hinges on developing contextually appropriate teaching models and addressing the complex multilingual needs of Nepal’s classrooms, particularly in rural and marginalized areas.
This edition presents an exclusive interview with two renowned scholars—Professor Dr. Yogendra Prasad Yadava and Professor Dr. Ram Ashish Giri—as they explore the complexities of MTB-MLE (Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education) policies, practices, and research in Nepal. Delving into its multifaceted challenges and opportunities, their discussion illuminates the cultural, educational, and sociopolitical dynamics shaping language-in-education reforms in the region.
Professor Yadava highlights Nepal’s policy-practice disconnect in implementing Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB MLE). Despite constitutional guarantees for mother-tongue education, contradictory laws impede implementation. He identifies systemic challenges: underdeveloped policies, scarce resources, and lack of localized materials. Effective execution requires teacher training, community language awareness, and rigorous research to evaluate and refine programs. Yadava stresses collaborative partnerships with academic and civil institutions to align practical strategies with evidence-based research, ensuring policy coherence.
Professor Ram Ashish Giri discusses the cognitive, pedagogical, and linguistic challenges of Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE) in Nepal. He emphasizes the importance of designing policies that reflect the country’s multilingual reality and align with local aspirations, advocating for the inclusion of English alongside native languages. Giri critiques the gaps between policy intentions and practical implementation, citing inadequate resources, teacher training, and community support.
Additionally, the issue includes three scholarly papers by devoted researchers from Australia and Nepal :
Naomi Fillmore’s paper explores the challenges and successes of incorporating Indigenous and minority languages into education systems globally. She examines initiatives in Nepal, Australia, the Philippines, and New Zealand, highlighting the importance of mother tongue-based multilingual education (MTB-MLE). While these countries face similar issues like resource development and teacher training, each context offers unique approaches. Fillmore emphasizes the crucial role of community involvement, policy support, and culturally appropriate educational content.
Dr. Uma Nath Sharma discusses the integration of students’ mother tongues (MT) in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education in Nepal, highlighting both the theoretical benefits and practical challenges. He emphasizes how MT enhances comprehension, cognitive development, and cultural identity, supported by theories like Cummins’ interdependence hypothesis. Despite these advantages, societal biases, teacher reluctance, and institutional pressures favoring English create obstacles. Sharma advocates for the use of translanguaging as a transformative pedagogical approach, allowing students to use their MT alongside English.
Dr. Bishnu Khadka presents the tension between Mother-Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE) policies and English Medium Education (EME) practices in Nepal, focusing on equity and inclusion. Analyzing policy documents, reports, and field studies, Khadka identifies challenges such as inadequate resources, insufficient teacher training, and sociocultural biases favoring dominant languages. The study highlights the gap between policy intentions and grassroots realities, which limits marginalized communities’ access to quality education.
For your convenience, here are the hyperlinks to the articles:
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to our co-editor, Dr. Nani Babu Ghimire, along with all our editors and reviewers—Jeevan Karki, Ganesh Kumar Bastola, Mohan Singh Saud, Sagar Poudel, Binod Duwadi, Puskar Chaudhary, Yadu Gnawali, and Dasharath Rai—for their unwavering dedication and invaluable contributions in bringing this issue to the readers.
ELT Choutari is a platform for researchers, scholars, educators, and practitioners to share insights, practices, and narratives from classrooms and communities. We invite you to contribute to our upcoming anniversary issue (January-March 2025) by submitting your articles and blogs to 2elt.choutari@gmail.com.
If you find value in the interviews, articles, and reflective pieces, please share them within your circles and feel free to leave your comments below each piece.
Aristotle urges us to be a master of metaphors to grasp a living reality of a thing. Following the footsteps of Aristotle, George Lakoff and M. Johnson introduce a perspective on metaphor—a perspective that takes metaphor as imaginative rationality. Admittedly, I am inspired by these two theorists. My inspiration is that I could not help using a simile to share my modest success in getting some of my responses to Call for Conference Proposals (CFP) accepted: Writing changes: remaking rhetoric in times of uncertainty organized by Corridors 2022 at Virginia Tech University, and Geographies of the Fantastic and the Quotidian organized by Pacific Ancient and Modern Language Association (PAMLA) 2022 at University of Los Angeles California. For Corridors, I developed a paper entitled “Pedagogical Emasculation in the Wake of AI’s Growing Applications”, and for PAMLA, I submitted an abstract with the title “Backsliding New Materialism and a Resurgence of Interest in Virtue Ethics and Anthropomorphism”.
While responding to these two CFPs successfully, I came to know that responding to a CFP is almost similar to being a gentleman caller. Forgive my wild rush to John Dryden called ‘yoking heterogeneous ideas by violence’. More technically, responding to CFP and being a gentleman caller are distinctly disparate realms of activities. Just as forwarding a love/marriage proposal without paying sufficient courtship to a lady for a quite bit of time may backfire and probably end in rejection, so is answering to CFP without doing an extensive inquiry and without having background information on the topic. Any rush to reply to the CFP may backfire on the responder, often ending in outright rejection, which might weaken confidence and concentration. It is this point of commonality that pushed me to choose this figural trope. The fate of being a jilted lover is a bitter pill to swallow for any obsessed lover, in much the same way as it is for a responder to cope with the rejection of the abstract submission to CFP. With this figural gesture, I would like to reflect on my experience of responding to a host of CFPs.
We have seen many calls for proposals (CFP): CFP for conferences; CFP for book chapters and journal articles; CFP for intermezzo and review essays; CFP for web texts and digital projects; CFP for a success story and cross-border narrative; CFP for blogs and reflective writings, CFP for cases of advocacy, activism, and intervention; and to name just a few. Scholars, researchers, and instructors alike tend to respond to different CFPs they come across. Every responder to CFP deploys a nuanced approach. In spite of each scholar’s unique response style to CFP, there should be a few widely practised formularies to deal with CFP. Based on a few instances of my success in responding to CFP, I would like to craft a short account of responding to CFP.
In trying to emerge as a conference hopper, I kept exploring many other venues that organize national and international conferences such as the New Berry Library Conference (NBLC), Popular Culture Association (PCA), Modern Language Association (MLA) Pedagogical Training and Workshop, Northeast Modern Language Association (NEMLA), Conference on College Composition and Communication (CCCC), Rhetoric Society of Europe (RSE), Rhetoric Society of America (RSA) and the list goes on. Actually, these venues release CFPs that tend to address any aspect of burgeoning issues, ranging from colonial reckoning, the rhetoric of precarity and the rise of authoritarianism to social justice, the linguistic justice, power and precarity attendant to AI’s growing application in learning and teaching space. Being well informed of all these burgeoning issues and of relevant proposals to address the issue constitute a core competency on each CFP responder’s part. Based on these two and various other successive experiences of responding to CFP, I would like to talk about some tips and strategies with which I succeeded in getting my conference proposals approved. I presented at a conference scheduled to take place at the University of Virginia Tech. Similarly, another conference proposal of mine was also accepted. In the second week of November 2022, I presented at a conference at the University of California, Los Angeles.
First, getting to the heart of an issue that takes centre stage in the CFP description is essential if we are to touch all the bases of CFP. While describing an issue/topic for CFP, the CFP issuer tends to be specific in producing an outline of the issue; at the same time, they often write, ‘the CFP moves around this topic, but not limited to…’, to allow for a somewhat flexible space to explore and probe the proposed issue.
Previously, while formulating an excellent abstract draft for a conference call, I used to take a general approach without homing in on a specific aspect of the CFP. After multiple rounds of rejection, I learned that people want to listen to specific things. Though the conference offers a smorgasbord of various potential topics, it would be in our best interest to dwell on the specificity of the issue. As soon as I shirked off this tendency to drift away from the axis of specificity, I realized that it wouldn’t be challenging to hit the target with the single most focused thrust to the specificity. To this end, it appears that any temptation toward delving deep into the topic in a manner most lithe and supple because exploring any issue by being specific is crucial to the acceptance success of a response to CFP. As to some heuristics and nuances with which the exploration of an issue would lead to a reliable unfolding of the issue, I have come to propose here: Test the efficacy of the issue in different cultural contexts, check on its limit, be aware of its fallibility, assess if its relevance is rooted in time and occasion, reflect on its impact on our normative practice and pragmatic life, and finally stretch your imaginative faculty to probe the issue under consideration with a detached mindset. The simultaneous shifts in my mindset led me to come across an acceptable topic for the CFP I was managing to respond to.
Second, though the power of forming a fresh, attention-grabbing, and shift-stimulating perspective of any responder to CFP is highly valued, the ability to introduce this perspective tactfully and without a lag matters the most. To translate this realization into action, I reflected on my expectations about how CFP evaluators take my abstract submission and what metric they would apply to assess the submitted abstract. I also pondered if their metrics and criteria remain consistent or if they apply abstract-specific metrics. I did my best to align the core thrust of my conference abstract with the CFP evaluators’ submission-specific yardstick of judgment. At the top of my talent, I aimed at ‘striking the right chord’; with the right chord being struck precisely, the net outcome is an acceptance call.
Third, the responder to CFP should not come to terms with the issue on the first go. Instead, the responder should let the proposed issue come to terms with a cumulative effort to develop a fresh perspective. For this, curious and consistent immersion in the latent and the manifest dimensions of the issue is required of those who play what Peter Elbow calls the Believing and Doubting Game. The fourth point is the assertion that with the idea of responding to CFP comes the responsibility to CFP. CFP wishes to garner a wide range of ideas, thoughts, propositions, perspectives, comments, questions, critiques, and curiosities. Most CFPs expect a concrete contribution of ideas to the platform the CFP is creating. Thus, every responder to CFP needs to internalize that to respond to CFP is to contribute something new, a fresh perspective, a nuanced approach to dealing with the proposed issue anew, a distinct approach indeed!
The fifth point that guided my approach to responding to CFPs is being aware that often CFPs asks for a fresh take on burgeoning issue/problem. Any response to CFP should look like a solution. Adopting a down-to-earth overture is a curtain-raiser to grappling with CFP head-on. The sixth tip comes in the guise of tonality. Maintaining an insistent tone serves two-pronged purposes: one is to bracket off any interference from digressive and deluding thoughts, and the other is to help the proposed perspective gain purchase. The use of an insistent tone wards off any trace of opaqueness that might arise while homing in on the target expectation of CFP. A response to CFP needs to be formed in keeping with the persistent presumption that whether others accept a proposal or not hinges on the same tone underpinning the proposal’s substratum.
The seventh clue to conveying a response to CFP is tricky. Throughout career-building in the academic field, students, scholars, and instructors respond to different types of CFP. Their responses often vary from acceptance and partial acceptance to outright rejection. In the case of outright rejection, it might be tough to bear the brunt of rejection, which might sap the spirit and entelechy one has been cultivating since the beginning of one’s academic footprint. In this condition of being in a low spirit due to sporadic rejection, one must groom oneself with a philosophical maxim, dictum, or conviction. In the wake of angst and anxiety consequent upon the rejection of any response to CFP, it would be tactful if one with the experience of rejection switches instantly from the erstwhile mental frame of lapsing into frustration and lamentation to a new mindset informed by the conviction that having been rejected means being hurled on the rose bed of renewal.
The last trick that may prove pivotal is catching a glimpse of and acting following the zeitgeist of contemporaneity that by and now diffuses across the world of CFPs. The spirit and entelechy of inclusion have penetrated every stroke of knowledge-making. Any linguistic shred and fragment are redolent of an alienating, exclusionary, and unjust practice, triggering a domino effect that ultimately spoils the inherent acceptability of the proposed perspective, no matter how full the proposal would be. All these strategic clues ultimately come down to a praxis that justice-fostering, dignity-ennobling, and identity-acknowledging rather than a collocational, standardized, and stereotypes-filled language pave the way for enriching the acceptability of proposed response to CFP.
Graduate students preparing to enter the job market are always hard-pressed to devote their whole time to completing their dissertation research. Nevertheless, they must invest more time in responding to CFPs for conferences, book reviews, review essays, success narratives, cross-border narratives, writing about their observation, and reflective writing. Since responding to the CFPs for a book chapter, journal articles, and intermezzo requires both intensive and extensive efforts, involvement, and time, it is relevant to conclude that trying to catch low-hanging fruit is an appropriate option for them. However, in no way should it not be understood as an underestimation of the potency and potentiality of graduate students inching closer to a threshold of the job market because there is quite an incredible number of graduate students who have already adorned their CVs with gems of their productive scholarship. However, speaking from a practical perspective and arguing in consideration of the pressure of time, including plenty of both teaching and administrative responsibility on the part of graduate students, there is every reason to advise that trying to catch low-hanging fruit still sounds like a lucrative and economical alternative for graduate students. In connection with this, responding to the CFPs for a conference, book review, review essay, essay on graduate student’s observation, and reflective writing such as cross-border narrative would be inviting and enticing for Ph.D. candidates on the verge of graduation who have built up a professional mindset of plunging into the job market soon.
At last, I would like to opine my thoughts on a type of stereotype that recurs in most of the announcements of CFP. On seeing sentences—such as ‘for book reviews and review essays, graduate students are encouraged and welcomed to contribute’—I felt irreparably stung by a scorpion of inferiority and of being pigeonholed. A query flashed across my mind instantly. There anyone, including me, could not but ask a question—why cannot graduate students, especially PhD candidates, respond to higher CFPs? The answer is obvious. In a general sense, responding to the higher CFPs demands time, resources and involvement. Graduate students are busy people who have a lot of work to do. I too was not an exception to this condition. Therefore, I was occasionally pained to see this sentence, but now I have mastered such a normal thought. With this unpleasant stream of thought, I would like to cut a long story short by saying that trying to catch low-hanging fruit—CFPs for conferences, book reviews, review essays, and reflective and observational writings—is a wise approach to redressing the harsh rhetoric of publish or perish. For clarity’s sake, I have presented below some pointers that could be helpful for any responder responding to a CFP:
Read and understand the CFP: It is in our best interest to go through the CFP document to understand the theme, topic, and requirements. Supportive here is the idea of paying attention to guidelines, word limits, formatting instructions, and submission deadlines.
Choose the right topic: Selecting a topic that aligns well with the theme of the conference or event is of enormous importance. Responders ought to make sure their research is relevant and innovative. Being mindful of the contributions the responder’s abstract makes is worth pondering.
Prepare an abstract: Of all the pointers pivotal to making a success of responding to CFP, crafting a compelling abstract that summarizes our paper or presentation is instrumental. So, the responder needs to clearly state the problem they are addressing, their methodological choice, and critical ideas and insights. It is good to ensure that the abstract is concise and engaging. The most crucial thing is the need to capture the attention of the reviewers.
Follow the submission guidelines: Successful responders to CFP ought to adhere to the submission guidelines provided by the organizers. They should pay close attention to formatting requirements, citation styles, and any specific file formats they may request.
Highlight your contribution: Each scholarly and institutional venue tends to judge an individual contributor to CFP in terms of their contribution. To that end, it is essential for them to clearly articulate the unique contribution of their work. The key to mastering this hurdle is to explain how it fills a gap in the existing literature, provides novel insights, or offers a fresh perspective. The responder need not dither about emphasizing their research’s significance and potential impact.
Present your qualifications: In an age in which an assertion is evaluated vis-à-vis self, highlighting our expertise, qualifications, and relevant experience in the field we are part of is of paramount importance. To buttress our credibility as responders to CFPs, providing a brief overview of our academic or professional background is imperative to establish credibility.
Proofread and edit: Before turning in our response to CFPs, it would be a cautionary measure to carefully proofread and edit our paper or abstract. If we ensure that our abstract is well-structured, free of grammatical errors, and coherent, it will be accepted. This is the principle we all need to live by. For that purpose, we can opt for feedback on our abstract from colleagues or mentors to improve the quality of our writing.
Meet the deadline: Submitting our response without crossing the specified deadline is advantageous because late submissions are typically not accepted. Hence, being proactive and active while planning our time and allowing for ample review and revision is of utmost importance.
Tailor your response: What matters most is the customization of our response to the specific requirements of the CFP. Reviewers are interested in hearing specific things; no one likes hearing general things. Thus, it is good to keep any idea of submitting generic or recycled content at bay. Tuning our response with the particular and genuine requirement is pivotal to actualizing the chance of acceptance.
Be professional and courteous: Since being soft and gracious matters a lot, it would be beneficial if they interact with the organizers and reviewers professionally and respectfully if they respond promptly to any inquiries or requests for additional information. The secret formulary to heighten our chance of having our abstract approved is one associated with living with a growth mindset and collaborative disposition throughout the process.
Works Cited
Garver, E. (1994). Aristotle’s rhetoric: An art of character. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
About the Author: Shiva Mainaly is a PhD in rhetoric and composition from the University of Louisville. Currently, at North Dakota State University (NDSU), he will become a postdoctoral research fellow from August 2023. A prolific author, he has published numerous articles in prestigious journals like the Journal of International Students, Constellation, and Composition Studies.
Growing up in a middle-class family with five siblings, my formative years were shaped by the love and care of my elders, instilling in me a sense of confidence and freedom. Among them, my father emerged as the most influential figure, guiding me with his hard work and selfless values. As I reflect on my educational journey and professional life, I realize how my father’s schooling continues to resonate, impacting my academic pursuits and shaping me into an educator who seeks to inspire and transform the lives of others.
The Enduring Legacy of My Father: Inspiring Values in My Academic Journey
Growing up in a modest family in the Baitadi district, my father’s determination, love for education, and selflessness left an indelible impact on my values, beliefs, and personal growth.
Despite their humble circumstances, my father’s family recognized the transformative power of education, impressing upon him the importance of prioritizing learning for a brighter future. Embracing this wisdom, he excelled academically and obtained top honours in the Kanchanpur district, the western part of Nepal. Working part-time to support his further studies, he completed B.Ed. in mathematics from Tribhuvan University, Nepal, and devoted over 36 years to teaching secondary-level mathematics in rural areas.
My father’s life experiences taught me the value of hard work, honesty, and unwavering determination to achieve my goals. His struggles also instilled in me a sense of gratitude for the opportunities I have today. His most profound lesson, however, was selflessness, his unwavering dedication to his family and society left an indelible impression on my character. As I pursued my academic journey, my father’s influence continued to guide me. Although my circumstances were more privileged, his lessons taught me that diligence and integrity make success possible.
His teachings not only shaped me as a good person but also as an authentic individual. I am determined to pass these invaluable lessons to my future family and students. With his enduring legacy as my compass, I seek to inspire and transform lives, just as my father has done throughout his remarkable journey.
Empowerment Through Education: A Personal Academic Journey
My academic journey commenced at home, where my family played the role of my first teachers, introducing me to alphabet belts and basic numbers. Though I began my formal education in a government school like my siblings, I had the privilege of studying in private (boarding) school (first in my family). This choice garnered public attention and prestige in our village, underscoring the value of education.
During my primary education, I excelled in memorization-based learning, securing top positions in my class. However, the system of rote learning limited my true understanding of the subjects. Shifting to government education posed initial challenges due to larger and more diverse classes, but I adapted over time, benefiting from a more flexible learning environment, albeit lacking student-centred approaches.
Upon completing my SLC, I went to Nainital India for my I.Sc., however I realized that my I.Sc. didn’t align with my interests, and faced language difficulties and homesickness. My family, understanding my predicament gave me the freedom to decide my academic path, leading me back to Mahendranagar, my hometown.
Embracing my interest in English, I pursued I.A. with English as my major subject. My academic journey continued rapidly, culminating in a B.A. with a major in English from Mahendranagar. My pursuit of higher education led me to Kathmandu, where I completed my M.A. in English literature from the central department of English in Kirtipur, achieving a first division. During my master’s studies, I harboured aspirations of becoming a police officer, inspired by the bold heroes of Hindi movies. However, my passion for teaching gradually surfaced, steering me away from the police force.
In this journey, education has played a pivotal role in empowering me intellectually. It provided me with knowledge, skills, and critical thinking abilities, enabling me to navigate various academic pursuits successfully. Furthermore, education has empowered me economically by opening doors to career opportunities and professional growth, allowing me to contribute meaningfully to society.
Education also fosters social empowerment, equipping me with the ability to share knowledge, mentor others, and contribute to the transformation of education in Nepal. Through my role as an educator, I have had the privilege of training teacher educators, presenting research papers at national and international conferences, and integrating innovative teaching strategies with ICT in language classrooms.
As I reflect on my academic journey, I recognize that education has been the key to my empowerment in multiple dimensions. Not only has it enriched my personal and professional life, but it has also instilled a deep sense of responsibility to empower others through the dissemination of knowledge and a commitment to transformative education.
Empowering Teaching Through Innovative Integration of ICT
As I embarked on my teaching journey at Darchula Multiple Campus, Khalanga, Darchula, Nepal in 2009 after completing my M.A. in English Literature from Tribhuvan University, I initially questioned whether teaching would become my true passion and profession. Not having an ELT background, my first experiences in university-level ELT classes left me feeling somewhat apprehensive. However, the positive responses and appreciation from both students and colleagues ignited a newfound enjoyment in teaching, leading me to realize that teaching was indeed my passion.
To improve my teaching skills and enhance my expertise in English Language Education further, I pursued a one-year B.Ed. and M.Ed. from Tribhuvan University. Determined to stay up to date with the latest pedagogy and educational technologies, I delved into integrating ICT into my ELT classrooms. The availability of ICT infrastructure, including computer labs, laptops, projectors, multimedia smart boards, and internet facilities, provided valuable tools to enrich the teaching and learning process.
The integration of ICT, though initially challenging, proved to be a motivating force in my teaching practices. Participating in various training sessions, workshops, webinars, and conferences, and learning from online resources like YouTube videos, I gradually adapted to using ICT more effectively in language classrooms. My colleagues often sought technical support from me when incorporating educational software such as MS Teams and Zoom during the transition to online classes amidst the pandemic.
Witnessing my students’ satisfaction and a keen interest in my classes further fueled my motivation to innovate in teaching by strategically incorporating ICT. A significant incident that highlights this impact occurred on 5th July 2021 when I was allowed to conduct ICT training for my colleagues at Far Western University Darchula Multiple Campus Khalanga Darchula. The training focused on using MS Team for upcoming online classes, and it became evident that many faculty members lacked familiarity with ICT in education. Their enthusiasm to learn and improve their ICT practices was inspiring. Guiding them through the basic functionalities of MS Team, such as creating class schedules, adding students as members, conducting quizzes, and facilitating group discussions, the session proved to be both engaging and fruitful, garnering appreciative comments from the participants and the dean of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences.
Despite facing challenges within the academic environment and culture, where well-performing teachers are sometimes undervalued or discriminated against based on political affiliations, I have remained steadfast in fulfilling my professional duties honestly and responsibly. The support and belief from my family, friends, and students have been instrumental in sustaining my resilience.
Through the transformative power of education and the innovative integration of ICT, my passion for teaching has flourished, empowering me intellectually and professionally. Beyond my personal growth, I aspire to be an agent of change, promoting the meaningful use of ICT in education and contributing to the advancement of the educational landscape in Nepal.
M.Phil. at Kathmandu University as a Gateway for Transformation
I decided to pursue an MPhil in English language education from Kathmandu University with the unwavering support and encouragement from my family, friends, and students. Their belief in my abilities and the significance of advancing my academic journey propelled me to seek an institution that would catalyze personal growth and transformation. In this esteemed institution, I got amazing mentors, whose mentorship equipped me with both theoretical knowledge and practical competencies, instilling in me the confidence to implement cutting-edge teaching strategies and adapt to the ever-evolving needs of my future students. Through their guidance, I deepened my understanding of English language education and acquired the necessary skills to become a proficient teacher for 21st-century learners. Engaging in teacher professional development activities, I was exposed to innovative teaching methods, educational technologies, and effective pedagogical approaches that are most relevant in today’s dynamic classroom environments.
Furthermore, the vibrant academic environment at Kathmandu University fostered a strong sense of community among fellow students. Collaborative projects, discussions, and academic events enriched my learning experience and provided me with diverse perspectives on educational practices. This supportive network of peers and colleagues further contributed to my personal and professional growth, creating a nurturing environment for exploration and intellectual development.
During my M.Phil. journey at Kathmandu University, I experienced a profound personal transformation and achieved notable professional growth. Embracing innovative teaching strategies, I contributed to the academic field through publications and disseminated knowledge to a broader audience. Additionally, my academic journey extended into teacher education and research, as I provided training and presented research papers at national and international conferences, contributing to the advancement of Nepal’s education system. This transformation has empowered me with the confidence to foster positive change and cultivate a passion for learning among future generations.
Summing up
My academic journey has been a transformative experience, catalyzed by the influence of my father’s dedication to education and selflessness. From the early years of learning at home to my pursuit of higher education at Kathmandu University, I have been intellectually and professionally empowered. By integrating innovative teaching methods and ICT in the language classroom, I have witnessed heightened student engagement and satisfaction. This journey has also enabled me to contribute actively to the field through my publications and knowledge-sharing endeavours with fellow educators. Supported by the unwavering belief of my family, friends, and students, I am determined to leverage the transformative power of education, creating a positive impact on the lives of students, and fostering progress within Nepal’s education landscape as I continue to evolve as an educator and researcher.
About the Author: Dammar Singh Saud is an assistant professor at Far Western University, Nepal. He holds an M.A. in English Literature and an M.Ed. in English Language Education. Currently pursuing an MPhil in English Language Education at Kathmandu University, his research interests include ELT Pedagogy, ICT in ELT, Teacher Professional Development, and Translanguaging.
Prem Prasad Poudel is a recent PhD graduate from The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong (2021/22). He is an Assistant Professor at Mahendra Ratna Campus, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal. He has experiences teaching at higher education in Nepal and Hong Kong, and has been continuously engaged in research with national and international teams on the issues of privatization in education, educational outsourcing, whole-child development, postgraduate students’ aspirations and well-being, medium of instruction policies, educational equality, and equity. He studied language policies, planning and the associated sociological issues during his PhD, and explored issues like language and social justice especially in the bi/multilingual social spaces nationally and internationally. Recently, he has been diving deeply into these issues to understand language and education issues from a socio-historical perspective.
Choutari editor, Nanibabu Ghimire has initiated a conversation with Dr. Poudel on language in education policies and practices, mother tongue education, English medium instruction (EMI) and its multiple facets. Enjoy this exclusive interview at Choutari.
Q: What do you think about the practices of medium of instruction (MOI) in school education in Nepal?
Starting from 1990s, we have seen significant developments in making language policies including MOI more people centric. The current constitution of Nepal allows the schools to use Nepali, English or the other languages of the nation as a medium of instruction in schools, up to the secondary level. Despite this policy, schools are aggressively (and sometimes blindly) shifting towards English medium instruction (EMI). The consequences of such shifts are adverse, especially for a multilingual and multicultural context. For instance, in Nepal’s case, even Nepali, the national language, has been displaced in many contexts from schools and has only been taught as a subject, and its (and several other languages) role as the MOI has been displaced by English. Hence, the practice of MOI in Nepal’s schools is highly English dominated. We have recently explored this issue from decolonial perspective and have published a paper, especially the colonial power of English in school and the efforts for the decolonization of it in school education in Nepal, which can be accessed here.
Q: Why are people attracted to English medium instruction (EMI) in school education in Nepal?
Good question. There is a craze toward adopting EMI in all levels of school education. This case is more serious in the early childhood education (the so called Montessori education). Several factors have driven this trend. First, EMI is our history, as it emerged along with the beginning of formal education in Nepal, which set a false belief that education in English is of better quality and of higher status. Second, the globalization and neoliberal marketization projected English as the language of opportunities, a key to cross-border employment opportunities and social mobility. The third factor is our social psychology. For example, in our case, perhaps similar to many non-native English-speaking countries, an ideology deeply rooted in Nepali society is that English is the language of prestige and higher social values such as being standard, educated or elite— an indicator of being an elite. This belief of projecting English as a high-valued language implies that languages other than English deserve less value and prestige. The main problem here lies in the superior-inferior labelling assigned to English and other non-English languages. This has affected our language choice in media, trade, education, family language practices and our lives in the public. For instance, if you walk around our marketplaces, most signboards are written in English at the top (perhaps in larger fonts) followed by Nepali (or none). This practice is intended to expand business and establish English as one of the commodities salable in the market. You know this is a form of hierarchization of languages in public places. It’s seemingly simple but has long-term implications for language policies.
Q: Despite having policy to provide basic education in learners’ mother tongue, people want to educate their children in English medium schools. How do you perceive this trend?
You’re right. There are legislative and educational policy provisions about using learners’ mother tongues or the most familiar language as a medium in schooling, which is good from a linguistic human rights perspective. However, people these days are attracted by the utilitarian values attached to languages. Some simple questions people have in their minds are, “What do I get by learning in my mother tongue? What are the benefits?” In my perspective, people today look for ‘socio-economic’ benefits out of learning in and learning of a language. This is a force coming in as a product of the neoliberal market that gives people a choice but simultaneously projects the economic gains or the material and social capital attached with learning a particular language as essential elements of an individual’s life. So, the growing trend of parents uncritically preferring to educate their children in EMI is unfortunate for contexts like ours, where children are taught the contents in the English language since the beginning of formal schooling.
Q: Meanwhile, language-minoritized parents are found to be motivated in teaching their children in EMI instead of their home language. What can be the reasons behind this?
I think the concerns should not be about majority or minority language speaking communities, rather, it should be about what structural conditions led these communities with less power to choose the dominant languages such as English for educating their children. In non-native English-speaking contexts beyond our national context as well, no matter the demographic strength of communities, they are driven by ‘English fever’. For example, in South Korea, as Choi (2022) pointed out, despite the deliberate efforts made by the governments, English continues to be the language of social prestige and quality education. Look at the Nepali native-speaking communities here in our context. People are more concerned about access to English, thinking access to English will widen their global space. The communities are abandoning or at least minimizing the use of their native languages in education. For them, it is not about whether their children learn English but the widening inequalities caused by English. Several researches in Nepal (e.g., Poudel & Choi, 2021; Phyak, 2016, 2021; Sah, 2022) have demonstrated it. While I was in the field for my doctoral study, I remember two EMI schools; one private and the other public. However, both students and parents of the public school were projecting the private school in the vicinity as of better quality. They thought that the English in these two EMI schools was unequal. They were anxious about the future life chances of their children due to the unequal exposure to English. Isn’t it interesting? So, what I mean is, people are not worried about the coercive impact of English on their ethnic/indigenous languages, rather, they are concerned about the consequences that their children might experience due to not getting exposed to zero or unequal English education. The main driving factor is their false assumption that ‘if you have English, you have everything, and if you don’t, you miss everything’, which is so unfortunate.
Q:So, does EMI improve the students’ English as parents/stakeholders think?
Schools today are intentionally or forcefully shifting their medium to English. To my knowledge, extensive research evidence to claim that the practice of EMI improves students’ English is still missing, especially from the Nepali context. However, there are mixed arguments regarding the benefits and side effects of EMI. For instance, since the 1990s, critical linguists have been questioning the inequalities in schooling posed by aggressive and unplanned adoption of EMI for children whose home language is other than English. At the same time, there are claims at the grassroots level that if EMI is appropriately implemented, extensive exposure to English may improve students’ proficiency in English. However, I would say no evidence claims that teaching English as a subject does not improve their proficiency. I think, we need more research evidence to answer your question in terms of Yes or No.
Q: How can we convince the people to teach their children in the home language (mother tongue) as mentioned in our policy documents? Or is that impractical? If yes, how?
Again, I would say that we should not think about convincing. This ‘ideology of convincing’ sounds more like a hegemonic idea, and it creates an impression of a ‘ruler-ruled’ relationship, which is impossible in an ideal democratic society. The most important thing we need to consider now is ‘what structural conditions enable the use of children’s home languages in education vis a vis English?’ Regarding policy, yes, there are relatively favourable policy conditions at the macro level, but the support systems for such policies to be implemented well are not sufficient and also are not owned by the parents, who are the key influencers in school policies. Unless we counter or challenge the prevailing ‘deficit ideologies’ concerning minority languages, we cannot realise the agenda of mother tongue education. To do so, I think one of the essential steps to be taken is enhancing the social and functional values of minority languages.
Q: Why is there a gap between MOI policy and practice in basic education in Nepal? How can this gap be eliminated?
As I also mentioned previously, the main problem is about ownership of the well-intended policies at the grassroots level. For instance, several reports of the Language Commission of Nepal have also highlighted that parental ownership concerning the use of local/indigenous languages is negligible, which invisibly forced the schools to adopt the dominant language the community gives priority to. This shows that there are instances of resistance (albeit invisible) from the bottom up, and the top-down policies have not been able to find their way. Consequently, we have missed a good policy action and positive response to the policy at the implementational level. Unless we address the factors that create this condition for policy-practice gaps, and establish causal relationships between policies and policy outcomes, such as the impact of the implementation of MOI, we will have hard times in bridging the policy-practice gaps.
Q:How do you perceive the current research practices of MOI in the global and local context? What would you suggest to researchers in language policy and planning moving forward?
Starting from the 1990s, language policy research gravely took a critical gaze, raising issues of inequalities and inequities caused by language policies of several nations. I remember one of the monumental works in language policy is J. W. Tollefson’s book, published in 1991. He raised critical concerns about challenging the structures that promote monoglossic ideologies in policy making. Since then, there are significant advancements in researching language policies such as MOI, for instances the works of Tollefson and Tsui (2004), Liddicoat and Baldauf (2008), to name some. The research trend in MOI has moved towards exploring sociological issues such as MOI and social classes, MOI and social hierarchies, inequalities, elitism, and commodification of language(s) (Block, 2021; Heller, 2010; Menken & Garcia, 2010). I am very happy to see that such issues in Nepal’s case are also increasingly explored by several applied linguists and critical scholars like Dr. Lava Deo Awasthi, Dr. R. A. Giri, Dr. Prem Phyak, Dr. Pramod Kumar Sah and several other emerging scholars including you. I cannot name every work of everyone of the language policy scholars here in this short interview, but I know that emerging scholars are exploring several socially embedded issues in language policy such as MOI. The critical scholars have also questioned the threats generated by English on the very existence of other languages in their respective community contexts at the global level. Another important development in our case is that universities (e.g., Far Western University) have developed very specific courses on language policy and policy research in M. Phil and PhD programs. I am sure that such developments will expand our context-specific research on language policy and associated concerns.
One of the critical concerns we need to explore is the intersectionality of language policies (e.g., MOI) with broader historical, structural, cultural and economic conditions of the society. We have initiated a discourse in this direction through a publication (see Poudel & Choi, 2022- entitled “Discourses shaping the language-in-education policy and foreign language education in Nepal: An intersectional perspective). I would suggest future language policy researchers direct their research on identifying the relationship of the forces such as nationalism, neoliberal marketization and ethnicity and their impact on language policy decisions and implementation. It would also be interesting to see (even question) the roles of national and international organizations (e.g., The World Bank, OECD, EU etc.) promoting the neoliberal agenda that aims to homogenize the world while also advocating for diversity and equity. Future research could also explore the ways of enhancing community participation and engagement in establishing an equitable society by promoting the local languages and cultures so that the local epistemologies can be preserved and used in uplifting the lives of people who are living under conditions of the feeling of inferiority, minoritization and hatred. To be frank, we need to engage in critical dialogues at all levels of governance to realize the agenda of multilingualism.
As you have come to this point, you might have thoughts, feelings, and views about Dr. Poudel’s opinions and the issues raised here, so we invite you to drop your comments and questions below to advance the discourse.
This article critically reflected the mismatches in educational language policy and practices in the schools located in the rural part of Nepal. Adopting the critical ethnography, I observed the classes of two basic level schools as a participant observer, conducted semi-structured interviews with four teachers, organized an FGD with teachers, maintained field notes, and reviewed the policy documents of local government to collect the information. The study revealed that the language policymakers and arbiters have mismatches on educational language policy ideologies, the local government’s educational language policy and its practices in the schools seem inconsistency that spaced conflicts amid monolingual, bilingual and multilingual policies and practices in education.
Keywords:Educational language policy, critical ethnography, ideological and implementational space, mismatches
Introduction
Educational Language Policy (ELP) is defined as “the official and unofficial policies that are created across multiple layers and poor institutional context and have an impact on language use and education in schools” (Johnson, 2013, p. 77). Since 1970s, the ELP has attracted the attention of Language Policy and Planning (LPP) scholars (Tollefson & Tsui, 2018), especially, how language policy creation, interpretation, and appropriation in schools impact educational processes and pedagogy (Johnson, 2013; Johnson & Pratt, 2014). The school as a broader site of language policy processes (Johnson, 2013) and the teachers and students as prime policy arbiters have greater responsibilities for the effective implementation of policies. In addition, the teacher as the major agency of ELP generates authority to allow or restrict the use of multiple languages in their classrooms, assures the ideological and implementational spaces, and creates an equitable linguistic environment. However, in the context of school sited in the rural part of Nepal, the ELP seem to have been implemented and practiced haphazardly that has resulted mismatches and conflicts among languages. The Constitution of Nepal (2015) has legally authorized the rights of decision-making on ELP to the Local Government (LG) (Poudel & Choi, 2020) with reference to the contexts, demands, and necessities of the stakeholders. Therefore, the LG is the authoritative organ to devise and implement ELP corresponding with the federal and provincial governments’ acts and policies. Conversely, the schools at local level have diverse policies and practices of languages that have impacted the content and quality of education. With this backdrop, the article focuses on how the teachers in remote schools create, interpret and appropriate language policy in their classrooms. Employing the ‘critical ethnography research on ELP’ (McCarty, 2011) at Vyas Municipal Government, Tanahun, I disclosed how the teachers and students acclimatize educational language policy and practice in multilingual school/classroom settings since ethnography of language policy as a method used to explore the multiple layers of language LPP processes with a focus on the power of individuals within educational contexts (Hornberger and Johnson, 2007).
Methods of the Study
This study has applied critical ethnography research design (McCarty, 2011) of the qualitative research approach under the critical-interpretive paradigm. For the study, I collected information using participant observation of basic level classrooms, semi-structured interviews with teachers, FGD with teachers, and policy reviews of the local government (i.e. Vyas Municipal Government, Tanahun). Four basic level teachers and a group of students were the participants in the study. The data were transcribed in participant’s mother tongue and translated in English. They are coded and three major themes were developed based on the codes for data analysis and interpretation.
Results and Discussions
The information has been critically analyzed, interpreted, and reflected in three major themes such as ‘mismatches in ideologies’, ‘mismatches in policy and practice’, ‘conflicts amid monolingual, bilingual and multilingual policies’ that have been presented in the subsequent section.
Mismatches on Ideologies
During the fieldwork, I encountered multiple and divergent ideologies of teachers and students on language policy process. The teachers’ determinations, interests, and vested ideologies on ELP have created ideological tensions among them and impacted teaching-learning activities. Vyas Municipal Government has promulgated Education Act (2017) and Education Bylaws (2018) that instruct to adopt ‘trilingual policy’ (i.e., Nepali, English, and Mother Tongue) in education, and have created ‘ideological and implementational spaces’ to local languages as well. However, the teachers have reflected divergent ideologies regarding the ELP in their contexts;
Nepali Language Policy (NLP) is good, the field of knowledge becomes wider and students learn a lot. Students’ knowledge is narrowed down due to ELP). English Medium Instruction (EMI) gives 50 percent knowledge, I believe. (From interview transcript, T: 2)
Contrary, the next teacher participant (T: 1) expressed his agency focusing on the demand, need and necessity of ELP in education;
ELP in education is necessary to produce manpower who can grab the opportunities in the world market; therefore, we have adopted English in education for five years. First, it was the demand of time, second, the pressure from parents ignited to adopt the policy. (Form interview transcript, T: 1).
The multiple and divergent ideologies of teachers regarding the creation, interpretation, and appropriation of ELP have produced ideological discrepancies and created tensions and challenges for the effective implementation in the classroom rather than a compromise. The diverse expressions and ideological variance challenge policy creation and implementation in multilingual classroom settings. Most importantly, the policy arbiters’ ideologies have been divided into multiple groups in terms of language used in the classroom. Because of ideological clashes, the ELP is a blazing issue of debate in the multilingual classroom environment in Nepal.
Mismatches in Policy and Practice
School is the center of language policy practices, and teachers and students are the final arbiters (Johnson, 2013) and policy implementers. Moreover, teachers create their own ideological and implementational spaces in the classrooms which have resulted mismatches between local ELP and its practices. For example; the schools have adopted a bilingual policy (i.e., Nepali and English), however, the local government’s ELP has instructed them to use mother tongue compulsorily in basic level classes. I observed that the LG’s ELP has not been thoroughly implemented and practiced in schools; consequently, there exists inconsistency between policy and practices as instructed by LG. The school teachers have been interpreting, appropriating, and practicing ELP unfairly, for example; in English subject, the teacher and students adopt a bilingual policy (i.e., English and Nepali) but Vyas Municipal Education Act (2017) instructs languages (as a subject) shall be taught in the same language.
# Vignette 1: Language policy in the classroom (School: A, Grade -6)
(Topic: Biography of TS Eliot)
T: (students, please listen to me, ok?) TS Eliot was a playwright. You know playwright?
S1: No miss. What’s the meaning?
T: A Playwright is a person who writes drama or plays.
T: Playwright bhnaeko drama arthat natak lekhne byakti ho ke. Ho ababujyeu timiharule?
Ss: Yes, Miss. Aba bujhiyo. Nepalima bhanepachhi. (We understood after you said it in Nepali)
T: Ok, now say a playwright is a person who writes drama or plays…
Ss: (Then students follow the teacher) …
(Field note, July 24, 2021)
The policy provisions that basic education will be compulsorily provided in the mother tongue of the students; however, the schools do not have such practices rather they create and implement ELP on their own. The local ELP attempts to alleviate gaps in policies and practices but no proper implementation has been done in schools. The teachers state that the schools have mismatches among English-only, Nepali-only and Hybrid (mixed) language polices (Giri, 2015) but no consistency. The majority of schools have followed hybrid language policy (Kandel, 2021) as the teachers advocate “hybrid language policy has made the students easier to understand contents; therefore, the policy have been effective in our contexts” (FGD with teachers, July 24, 2021).
Conflicts amid Monolingual, Bilingual, and Multilingual Policies
There is a challenge to maintaining uniformed ELP because of linguistic and ethnic diversification of students and teachers. The varied ‘ideological awareness’ (Bakhtin, 1981), linguistic, ethnic and cultural backgrounds of policy arbiters in schools have spaced the critical perspective on ELP; consequently, the teachers revealed conflicting ideologies regarding the use of languages in education. Ultimately, the schools in the territory have adopted monolingual, bilingual and multilingual policies and practices in their classrooms. See verbatim of the teachers in the FGDs;
The classes from nursery to class ten are taught in English…First, it was the demand of the time, second, the pressure – the people from other places came to our school and demanded English medium. EMI has been adopted for 5 years. (FGD, T: 2, July 24, 2021)
We do not have a 100 percent EMI policy in school; we use about 70 percent English and 30 percent Nepali. Teaching in both English and Nepali has made it easier to understand contents. So the bilingual policy is very good. We have been adopting mixed medium. (FGD, T: 3, July 25, 2021).
In English subject, if the students don’t understand, I translate it into Nepali and Hindi as well. I also prefer students’ mother tongues. Therefore, I use three to four languages in my class. (FGD, T: 4, July 26, 2021)
The above excerpts reveal the fact that there is a dilemma whether to adopt EMI or NMI or MTB-MLE policy in education (Phyak, 2013), which has created tensions and mismatches to the teachers to deliver the contents. The disparities in policies have spaced and raised linguistic conflicts and unhealthy competition among languages and their users.
Conclusion
In Nepal, ELP has raised a national debate; especially in the multilingual school/classroom contexts. The policy arbiters (i. e., teachers and students) have created, interpreted, and appropriated ELP in the classrooms without analyzing the consequences and results. Similarly, the ELP adopted by the schools and teachers is divergent to LG’s education act and policy, national education policy, and constitutional provisions; as a result, there seem mismatches and gaps in policies and practices. Therefore, the local governments seem failure to utilize local linguistic capital and are inactive to implement the local ELP in schools/classrooms. To conclude, I suggest the local government, school authorities, and policy arbiters need adequate interaction and discussion for the ‘ideological clarification’ before, while and after the creation of ELP.
References
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Fours essays. University of Texas Press.
Constitution of Nepal. (2015). The Secretariat of Constituent Assembly. Nepal Law Commission.
Giri, R. A. (2015). The many faces of English in Nepal. Asian Englishes, 17(2), 94-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2015.1003452
Hornberger, N. H., & Johnson, D. C. (2007). Slicing the onion ethnographically. Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 509-532. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264383
Johnson, D. C. (2013). Language policy. Palgrave Macmilan.
Johnson, D.C. and Pratt, K. (2014). Educational language policy and planning. In C. A Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. John Wiley & Sons.
McCarty, T. L. (Ed.). (2011). Ethnography and language policy. Routledge.
Poudel, P. P. & Choi, T. H. (2020): Policymakers’ agency and the structure: The case of medium of instruction policy in multilingual Nepal, Current Issues in Language Planning, https://doi.org/ 10.1080/14664208.2020.1741235
Ricento, T., & Hornberger, N. H. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 401–427.
Tollefson, J. W. & Tsui, A. B. M. (2018). Medium of instruction policy. In J. W. Tollefson and M. Perez-Milans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Policy and Planning, OUP. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190458898.013.12
Vyas Municipal Education Act. (2017). Local Gazette. Vyas Municipality.
Vyas Municipal Education Bylaw. (2018). Local Gazette. Vyas Municipality.
About author
Basanta Kandelis a Lecturer of English at Aadikavi Bhanubhakta Campus, Tanahun, and a Ph. D. Scholar in Tribhuvan University, Nepal. He is the Vice-chair of NELTA Tanahun, a Member of IATEFL, and the Editor of vyasshree.com. He has published dozens of articles, edited journals, and presented papers at national and international conferences (IATEFL, UK and LPP, Canada). His areas of interest include language policy and planning, linguistics, ELT, and research methodology.
[To cite this: Kandel. B., (2022, October 15). Mismatches on Educational Language Policy and Practice: A Critical Reflection [blog post]. Retrieved from https://eltchoutari.com/2022/10/mismatches-on-educational-language-policy-and-practice-a-critical-reflection/]
This paper tries to explore the process and practices of language in education policy in local governments of Nepal. For the study, I selected a local government of the Rupandehi district and took the mayor and deputy mayor as respondents who have been working in the area of local policy-making activities. I performed in-depth interviews for the qualitative data with semi-structured interviews based on the education and language policies they had prepared before. The finding of this research revealed that there is an inconsistency between policies and practices of language in education policy in local governments of Nepal. It is also found that policymakers are positive to promote the local languages but inattention is found by the local language communities.
Key Words: Language in education policy, language planning, local government, locallanguage, English as the medium of instruction
Introduction
Nepal is a little nation with a wide variety of cultures, languages, ethnic groups, and biological areas. According to Census 2011, there are more than 123 languages and 125 ethnic groups in Nepal. These languages are genetically affiliated to four language families: Indo-European (Indo-Aryan), Sino-Tibetan (Tibeto-Burman), Austro-Asiatic, and Dravidian. The Indo-Aryan family is the largest language group in Nepal in terms of the number of speakers. Among these languages, “most Indo-Aryan languages have literate traditions and share a well-developed writing system” (Giri, 2009, p. 34). According to the Census 2011, there are eight major languages spoken in Nepal. They are Nepali (44.6%), Maithali (11.7%), Bhojpuri (5.78%), Tharu (5.11%), Tamang (5.11%), Newar (3.2%), Magar (2.98%), and Awadhi (2.47%). Nepal’s inherent and historical identity is its multilingualism. Diversity in language, culture, and ethnicity has long been a defining characteristic of Nepali society. The same type of characteristics is found at the local levels of Nepal. Different languages function as symbols of ethnic identity and each speech community wants to preserve and promote its language. As the primary governing body, the local level should be aware to protect local languages, script, culture, cultural civility, and heritage in its territory. The Constitution of Nepal (2015) article 32(1) has provisioned the basic right to each community, the right to get basic education in the mother tongue and to preserve and promote the community’s language, script, culture, cultural civility, and heritage. The Constitution of Nepal (2015) has also taken local government as an autonomous body that can formulate the policies and laws to preserve the language, script, sculpture, art, music, literature, and another custom of their community. Due to high linguistic diversity, local governments find autonomously managing language in education policy rather challenging, though they also welcome the new opportunity to address local issues related to language in education (Poudel, & Choi, 2021).
Language-in-education policy is one of the fundamental issues of language planning studies. According to Shohamy (2006), language in education policy is a method of imposing and manipulating language policy since individuals in positions of control use it to put ideology into practice through formal education. Nepal became a Federal Republic Democratic country after the promulgation of the Constitution of Nepal (2015). This constitution provisioned three levels of the elected governments in Nepal: federal government, provincial government (seven provinces), and local government (753 municipalities). Local governments have given decision-making power in several educational matters under this Constitution. They have been given the authority to design and develop their education policies, including language in education policy, though these governments need to line up with the fundamental framework provided by the federal government. Due to high sociolinguistic diversity, local governments are facing challenges in implementing education policies in their municipalities (Panthee, 2021). There is an education committee that actively participates in formulating policy which is made up of professionals, legislators, head teachers, and education authorities. This committee along with the local government are responsible for planning, implementing, and monitoring locally developed courses and appropriate policies, as well as providing financial support to their educational institutions. The objective of this study was to explore the inconsistency between policies and practices of language in education policy in local governments. This paper is significant in the sense that how the local governments are involving formulating and implementing the language in education policy in the multilingual context.
Methodology
This paper is based on the theoretical lens of ‘the critical ethnography of Language in the education policy of the local government of Nepal. Critical ethnography is a method of examining the spaces for agencies, actors, contexts, and processes across the multiple strata of language policy creation, interpretation, and appropriation espousing a critical approach focused on the educational context (Hornberger & Johnson, 2007). I engaged in a research site which was a municipality in Rupandehi district. I was involved in the field with the mayor and deputy mayor who were key persons in formulating different policies including language in education policy. I performed in-depth interviews for the qualitative data and conducted semi-structured interviews based on the education and language policies they had prepared before. The interview was conducted in a natural setting without being judgmental according to their convenience. I recorded the information in audio recording supported by note keeping. I employed qualitative data analysis process which includes transcribing, editing, summarizing, organizing, categorizing deriving conclusions from the information collected from various sources.
Results and Discussion
LEP at the Local Level Beyond the Practice
The local governments have been given the authority to design and develop their education policies. The research site of this study has prepared its education policy as Municipal Education Act 2018. Article 7 of the act has provisioned that the medium of instruction to be provided by the schools shall be the Nepali language, English language, or both languages. Primary education can be given in the mother tongue. Languages [as a subject] shall be taught in the same language. The medium of instruction for English language teaching must be English. The municipality has the concept of monolingual, bilingual, and multilingual education concept for the transformation (Education Act 2018). The municipality has concerned about the national policy on language and education. It has prepared the education policy according to the essence of the constitution of Nepal and tried to formulate education policies to mitigate gaps in policies and practices. In this regard mayor of the municipality stated that we are careful to protect local and indigenous languages and prepared the policy according to the constitution of Nepal. The municipalities have mentioned and focused on mother tongue-based education, multilingual education, and English as mediums of instruction but it is very difficult to apply in the real sense. According to Poudel and Choi (2021), the Constitution of Nepal-2015, which offers a suitable legislative framework for substantive legal protection for the national indigenous languages as a medium of instruction, addresses the challenges of protecting and promoting historically existing linguistic variety. In the same way, the deputy mayor showed devotion to protecting the indigenous language and said;
we are aware to protect the local languages and made the policy according to the constitution of Nepal but it is very difficult to apply the policy because of the fascination with English as an international language and Nepali as an official language.
Local governments have to choose bi- and multilingualism as a minimum requirement to teach children at the primary level as basic education for the creation of this strong foundation to take place. But it is very difficult to successfully implement this provision due to the global political economy, interdependence, and diversity of the municipalities. Kadel, (2015, p. 196) states that there is a huge challenge for the local governments of Nepal to implement the plans and policies effectively. The deputy mayor said, “We are encouraging local people to promote their language but they are not giving priority to the languages they send their children to English medium schools from ECD”. It demonstrates how the locals have neglected to promote their languages. Three-level governments are silent on this issue, leaving parents, educators, and school management committees to decide whether to stick with their mother tongue-based multilingual education strategy or transition to English (Phyak, 2013, 41).
Mother Tongue-Based Language Policy but Lacks in Practices
Mother tongue-based multilingual education is a form of multilingual education built on the learners’ mother tongue. Kandel (2010) argued that mother tongue-based multilingual education is significant not only to develop a strong educational foundation but also to strengthen the cognitive development of learners at the beginning of education. Mother tongue-based multilingual education helps strengthen the first language and provides a smooth transition from the first language to the second and the third language. In this regard, the mayor said
We understand providing education in the mother tongue is the best way of educating children at the primary level so we have stated the provision as every Nepali community residing in our municipality shall have the right to acquire education in the mother tongue. But local people are not positive about it and they send their children to Nepali and English medium schools so we are unable to apply the local curriculum in local languages.
Above mentioned saying states that the policymakers are positive to protect local language but local people neglect to use their mother tongue in education. Where education is not provided in a child’s first language this is increasingly seen as a form of discrimination, limiting the application of this right. UNESCO (2011) referring to Skutnabb- Kangas (2003) states that if teaching is in a language that an indigenous child does not know, the child sits in the classroom for the first 2-3 years without understanding much of the teaching. Language-in-education policymaking is complicated primarily due to its unique demographic structure, i.e., the multilingual and multiethnic population of the municipalities. The federal, provincial, and local governments are focusing on MT-MLE policies but the parents are not emphasizing it. They are not convinced of the value of the MLE program. Speaking one’s mother tongue, as well as the national language and the international language, not only gives one more option in life but also promotes national cohesion (Baker, 2011).
Positive Attitude toward Local Languages, but Emphasis on English Medium
Both policymakers have a strong positive attitude toward protecting local and indigenous languages. They feel more prestigious to protect and promote local culture, language, and art. But local people themselves are embarrassed about speaking their native languages in the presence of speakers of the dominant language. They believe that educating children in their mother tongue has created a children-friendly atmosphere in the school but the mayor claimed that ‘Parents are not ready to send their children to their mother tongue-based school even Nepali medium school.’ There is a trend of sending children to English medium school because they believe that studying English medium gives better results. Deputy Mayor argued that her municipality encouraged English medium instruction since English is an international language and learning it would help students in the long run. Parents have a mindset that their children receive quality education only when they go to English medium schools. Slowly and gradually community schools are shifting into English medium schools from Nepali medium schools. The mayor said ‘We are allocating enough budget to strengthen community schools to improve English as a medium of instruction. Therefore, English-medium instruction at institutional schools and some community schools in Nepal is currently being evaluated for quality in terms of instruction. So we can find that the policymakers are positive to protect local languages but local language communities are not aware to protect their mother tongue. They want to send their children to English medium schools and they focus on English as a subject and medium of instruction. In the name of quality and parents’ demand, community schools are shifting to English medium schools.
Conclusion
Nepal is facing the complexity of language policy-making in education. The promulgation of the Constitution of Nepal (2015) officially transformed the country into a federal republic democratic nation that delegated the authority of decision-making in many educational issues to local governments. The local government has been preparing the policies as per the constitution of Nepal. They are struggling to implement its educational policies and plans. This study found that federal, provincial, and local governments made different provisions concerning language in education but it is difficult to implement in real practices. There is an inconsistency between policies and practices of language in education policy in local governments. Even though local governments have made various provisions to respect the local languages, students and parents do not go with the MT-MLE policies. It is dominance of English as a sign of dominance and linguistic capital.
Author’s note: This paper is a part of my M.Phil. study at the Graduate School of Education, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.
References
Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Multilingual matters.
Central Bureau of Statistics. (2012). National population and housing census-2011. Kathmandu: Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commission (NPC).
Constitution of Nepal. (2015). The Government of Nepal. Kanun Kitab Bebastha Samittee.
Education Act (2018). Sainamaina Municipality Lumbini Province Nepal.
Giri, R. A. (2009). The politics of ‘unplanning’ of languages in Nepal. Journal of NELTA, 32-44.
Kadel, P. (2015). Reviewing multilingual education in Nepal. Multilingual and development, 189-204.
Kandel, P. (2010). Mother tongue-based multilingual education. Nepal: Language Development Centre (LDC)
Panthee, D. (2021). Language in education policy in local governments: A case of Rupandehi district. Journal of NELTA Gandaki, 4(1-2), 119-132.
Phyak, P. (2013). Language ideologies and local languages as the medium-of- instruction policy: A critical ethnography of a multilingual school in Nepal. Current Issues in Language Planning, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14664208.2013.775557
Poudel, P. P., & Choi, T. H. (2021). Policymakers’ agency and the structure: The case of the medium of instruction policy in multilingual Nepal. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(1-2), 79-98.
Ricento, T. K., & Hornberger, N. H. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. Tesol Quarterly, 30(3), 401-427.
Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. Routledge.
UNESCO, (2011). Multilingual education in Nepal: Hearsay and reality? A report. Kathmandu: UNESCO. https://bangkok.unesco.org/content/multilingual-education-nepal-hearsay-and-reality-report
About Author
Dinesh Panthee is an Assistant Professor of English Education at Sahid Narayan Pokharel Ramapur Campus Sainamaina, Rupandehi, Nepal. He is an M Phil scholar at Graduate school of Education, TU. He is interested on language in education policies, methods and techniques in education, teacher professional development, ICTs in education, and eastern philosophy including Buddhism. He is the membership secretary of NELTA Butwal.
[To cite this: Panthee. D., (2022, October 15). Language in Education Policy at Local Level of Nepal[blog post]. Retrieved from https://eltchoutari.com/2022/10/language-in-education-policy-at-local-level-of-nepal/]
The coronavirus (i.e., COVID-19) crisis has brought unprecedented challenges in all the systems including education globally, and communities, particularly in the developing countries, are suffering the most as the public service systems in these countries are not well-planned. The coronavirus pandemic has been a portal that leads the world to reconfigure the future (Roy, 2020) largely different from the one we are/were living. The human sufferings are unprecedented, and of course not measurable either in terms of the economic, social, and psychological losses (both visible and invisible). There are tragic consequences everywhere, and the education sector is one of the most affected ones due to school closure, leaving millions of students from pre-school to the university at homes. The fundamental services of education have halted, with students without textbooks, face-to-face formal interactions, and detachment from their peers. This unexpected context has forced people to think about transformations for the future to enable the pedagogical contexts to recover from the losses, and to cope with the similar future challenging in education systems.
Although schools and universities have tried hard and the best to compensate the loss of schooling by adopting the online mode of instruction, both teachers and students’ limited access to internet facilities, particularly in the least developed countries (LDCs) such as Nepal has become a barrier to holistically shift the physical school to online teaching and learning. This scenario has further accentuated the discourse on equity, concerning the widening gap in terms of access to resources, learning opportunities, human resource management, and the effectiveness of the learning (if any). Similar to Ebola, AIDS, SARS, and Spanish Flu, this pandemic has taught us a lot about humanity, human attachments, health, and urgency of international cooperation. Against this backdrop, in this paper, I have presented my reflection, not necessarily based on strong empirical data, on the potential pathways that we MUST adopt to accelerate transformations in our education systems. By ‘our’, I mean Nepali society, however, my arguments would equally apply to other similar contexts waiting for reforms in their education systems.
The schools are closed for an indefinite time, and standardised tests are suspended. Discourses on educational standards and qualities are extended and enlarged due to the spread of coronavirus. Many people are living with the absence of their friends and families, while others are crammed in their families experiencing probably the longest moment of togetherness with family members. For many, the homes are transferred to online learning stations. The online meetings have covered the walls of Facebook and other social media pages. Perhaps it is the worst ever experience my generation people have had of such pandemic. However, it should also be taken as an opportunity and the right time for countries and relevant communities to unlearn, relearn and rebuild their educational systems to prepare for a better future.
The challenges in schooling
Despite the massive stimulus measures in response to the Covid-19 effects, the global economy is estimated to be hit by recession in 80 years (Guenette, 2020), the deepest since World War II (Al-Samarrai, Gangwar, & Priyal, 2020), and the financial distress will severely impact on the education sector. In other words, this pandemic is likely to impact on several key aspects of education, including financing, resource management, school expansion, and access to learning.
Financing Constraints
The pandemic crisis is likely to leave the education sector vulnerable in terms of infrastructure development including the endeavours to equip schools with technological innovations. In Nepal, the budget allocated for education is inadequate. In the fiscal year 2076/77 (2020/21 AD), the Government allocated 11.64% budget for the education sector (Ghimire, 2020, May 29), which is very less than the budget spent in countries with larger and established economies. Although here is a mere increase in the budget compared to the current fiscal year, two of the ambitious programmes:six-thousand volunteer teacher mobilisation and mid-day meal, will cover more than three quarters (6 billion) of the total increment of 8 billion rupees. It indicates that there will be a limited budget needed to embrace information and communication technology (ICT) in the educational sector.
Human resource development and management
The low-level budget allocations in the education sector, especially in higher education will have serious consequences in managing technical human resources, and technological innovations, due to budget shortages. It is making both short-term and long-term effects on human resources development on handling the technology integration in teaching and learning. Last month, I had a talk with a teacher of a primary school about the use of technology in teaching, and his immediate reaction was “We have a computer and a printer in our school, but we are unable to use them because we could not find a technician to repair them”. His exemplary experience informs us about the level of understanding of what technology in teaching is, and how computer technology is used in schools in remote Nepal. I had a short visit to one of the public campuses in Kathmandu Valley, and during a talk, the campus chief of the campus said, “Sir, we have managed IT on our campus”. I was thrilled and wanted to see how they have made the reform. He took me to one of the carpeted classrooms and showed some computers (seemingly unused for months) and said that it was the IT lab, where students could occasionally go to learn the computer.
These two instances, which I brought here from my own primary experience, tell us how people perceive the use of technology in teaching and learning. In none of the above cases, there was technology integration in pedagogy. They have understood that technology means having computers and using them occasionally for specific purposes such as showing how to open a word file, how to type, and how to print. The development of a broader framework for human resource development in a planned way is a greater challenge ahead.
School expansion and access
Insufficient budget for public education leads to the decline in education outcomes, and poorer education services, which ultimately impacts on parents’ affordability for their children’s education. In Nepal, usually, the households that largely rely on the remittances for education funding of their children and relatives will suffer a lot. It is predicted that expensive private school education will cause an increment in the enrollment in community schools and then pressurise the community schools to accommodate a large number of students. However, community schools at the current state without minimum ICT infrastructure and comfortable learning environment for those students coming from private schools will not be able to hold them and again private schools may take this advantage. Consequently, the social gap between the communities with high and low-income will be much wider than it is.
These challenges, along with many others, need to be addressed in time to meet the new demands of educating in the post-crisis period. I suggest some viable ways to begin the reform in education in Nepal.
Ways ahead
In general, the current context requires us to understand and transform the overall schooling system in a completely different way, as the opportunities for learning have completely gone online. However, the majority of students and teachers, particularly in Nepal, are unable to access online learning for many reasons including the lack of ICT infrastructure, expensive mobile data, and limited or no digital literacy of teachers and students. Complaints have been raised regarding teachers’ efficiency in the use of the online learning management system (LMS) platforms. Teachers’ inability is not due to their negligence but due to their ill-prepared teacher education systems (programmes) that did not equip them with even the basics of integrating technology in pedagogy.
I remember when I was mentoring some students during their field experience in teaching three years ago that they were compelled to follow the lesson planning as par with the lesson plan booklets commercially prepared. This practice barred the students to prepare their lessons autonomously. One of the student teachers asked, “Sir, is it good for English students to follow the same pattern as Science students while preparing lesson plans using this booklet?”. I was speechless, as I knew that this system was not viable, and the student teachers were not even having their own space for altering the patterns of lesson preparation. All the student teachers were filling out the same lesson plan formats provided to them. This is just an example that how we are highly structured in our education systems, following the conventions developed decades ago, and not even asking students to think beyond the box. The main concern I wanted to raise here is that “How does the current strategy of educating and preparing teachers to meet with the growing challenges in learner autonomy, blended learning, and integration of technology in teaching and learning?”.
The crisis has prevailed a need for school transformation by enabling educators and teachers. However, the economic crisis hit by COVID-19 will be a great challenge particularly for developing countries like Nepal to even revive the pre-COVID-19 schools. School transformation is a multifaceted process, including teacher empowerment, readiness, and responsiveness. It is a high time to think about how the teachers can be better equipped to navigate the wounds surfaced in this dark time to reconstruct life anew for themselves and their children through the schooling process. The relevant government agencies can also think of benefitting from the outsourcing of the education services, especially in terms of managing the techno-friendly resources including technical assistance in LMSs design, teacher training, and material development. Although outsourcing of educational services sometimes understood as ‘businessification’ of schooling (Bates, Choi & Kim, 2019), it has been widely adopted as a ‘tested solution’ to many educational problems in many countries such as Japan, South Korea, and Hong Kong SAR of China.
Enabling teacher agency
There needs a ‘transformation from within’ to meet the challenges generated by this global crisis and a shift from the traditional ‘banking model of education’ (Freire, 1970). Teachers should be prepared for fostering their self-reflexivity and responsibility in shaping their actions in their social contexts. Although teacher agency has been underestimated in the educational contexts of the countries with developing economies, it has been observed that teachers can make the change, provided that they are exposed to an all-enabling environment, both through institutional and professional support. Teachers as reflective practitioners and professional decision-makers (Borg, 2008), also as insiders of the learning process, should be encouraged to come up with their strategies to meet their contextualised learning requirements. The current crisis has also taught us that “the one-size-fits-all” type of blanket strategies, mostly drawn from the global-north contexts, are no longer relevant. In the case of Nepal, owing to its wider demographic diversities such as socio-economic status, language backgrounds, geographical situatedness and cultural orientations, the strategies formed at the federal level will be less likely to succeed requiring greater role of the local government in taking actions to put the policies into practices. In having so, more localised research-supported strategies for maximising teachers’ agentic actions are the must. Teachers are the forefront fighters whenever there is a learning crisis.
Enabling autonomous learning conditions
The transformations can emerge from our actions based on our ideologies and self-regulated efforts to prepare our learners for their life-long learning. The current centralised curriculum development and implementation process have been a problem-posing condition as it does not prepare the learners to be the innovators and self-regulators. The teachers and students are waiting for the state agencies to avail the textbooks for them to start the pedagogies. The curriculum needs to recognise and validate teacher and learner agency in shaping their localised learning environment. The COVID-19 has taught us about making the change from within, not necessarily waiting for some externally sourced interventions facilitating us to transform our professional rituals.
Therefore, it is essential to enable our teachers and students to create their autonomous learning conditions by:
Developing and providing them with the simplified digital learning programmes
Accelerating local governments’ engagement on developing learning materials at the micro-level
Streamlining non-governmental organisations towards facilitating the technical requirements, and
Supporting parents to educate (or facilitate the learning of) their children.
These strategies are rightly doable to manage and enable autonomous learning conditions at the grassroots level. However, at the same time, none (teachers, students, and parents) should be the victim of the circumstances like the current crisis. Teachers, students, parents, and the local level governmental and non-governmental agencies can be engaged in supporting the children to learn. It can be done by bringing all of them together with complementary roles in scaffolding design by enabling innovative learning environments. For instance, the development partners working in the education sectors can provide the local governments with emergency funding opportunities, and parents of each learner can support learning by engaging them in the family affairs, rituals, and daily chores.
Embracing technology: A blended mode of learning
Despite the well-articulated ICT enhancement policies of the government since the beginning of the 21st century in Nepal, the use of technology in teaching and learning contexts is still in its infancy, particularly in the public education system (Rana & Rana, 2020). However, it is also important that we should be able to grab the highest-level advantage out of the use of technology in teaching and learning, which is very much a core part of learning in this digital era. It should also be noted that technology alone is not a panacea for compensating all kinds of learning gaps, as it is just a tool or a medium to facilitate learning. Therefore, the best feasible way for all learning conditions is to develop a justifiable blend of face-to-face and online (virtual) learning. Although media particularly social media like Facebook and twitter are covered by discourses of the use of ICT that would do everything possible, I believe that it is just a good friend of humans and that human values the kids need now are best transferrable and learned through direct human contact and interaction in a comfortable zone. In our educating system, we should be able to ensure that technology is used to integrate the aspects of our indigeneity of knowledge, cultures, values, and worldviews. Moreover, it is essential to include local epistemologies, heterogeneity, the multiplicity of values, and pluralism to make everyone feel owned.
From the above discussion, I come to a holistic picture of the transformation required as presented in figure 1.
Figure 1: A model for school transformation
Figure 1 provides a holistic approach to innovations in schooling in such a way that teachers, parents, and the social institutions can actively engage with their agency in the learning conditions that teachers promote autonomy, indigenous pedagogies, and professional development opportunities. A culturally responsive environment that incorporates technology will lead to greater success in meeting our 21st-century learning needs.
Conclusion
This reflection reiterates that evidence-based policymaking for the transformation in Nepal’s education system is essential to prepare our students for a better future, in such a way that our schools remain the “places of mutual respect and a place for understanding human differences and opposing viewpoints” (Arnove, 1994, p. 211) along with their equal access to learning opportunities. We have to be able to institutionalise our indigenous pedagogies that enable our students to equally participate in the learning process. The adoption of technology in teaching and learning might also contribute to foster such inequalities differently, as technology has a double-edged effect. On the one hand, it has created an unequal learning opportunity, and on the other, it has been established as the only alternative mode of learning available during this crisis. All that requires a coherent policy framework that consistently facilitates and controls the local innovations with stronger visions and valuing on teachers. We have a lot to learn from Singapore, where “talk less, learn more” is the core principle of teaching (Hogan, 2014).
Mr Prem Prasad Poudel is currently a PhD scholar at The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. He has worked as a lecturer of English Education at Mahendra Ratna Campus, Tribhuvan University, Nepal for more than a decade. Mr Poudel is a well-established as a teacher educator, teacher trainer and material writer in the field of ELT in Nepal. He has presented papers and published articles in the renowned national and international journals such as Journal of NELTA and Current Issues in Language Planning, respectively. Previously, Mr Poudel also served as the secretary of the Central Executive Committee of NELTA.
References
Al-Samarrai, S., Gangwar, M. & Gala, P. (2020). The Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on education financing. World Bank, Washington, DC.
Arnove, R. F. (1994). Education as contested terrain: The case of Nicaragua: 1979–1993. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Bates, A., Choi, T. H., & Kim, Y. (2019). Outsourcing education services in South Korea, England, and Hong Kong: a discursive institutionalist analysis. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1614431
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Herder and Herder.
Ghimire, B. (2020, May 29). The national budget fails to prioritise education, experts say. https://tkpo.st/2AiSQCZ
Rana, K., & Rana, K. (2020). ICT Integration in Teaching and Learning Activities in Higher Education: A Case Study of Nepal’s Teacher Education. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(1), 36-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2020.01.003
Roy, A. (2020). The pandemic is a portal. Financial Times (3rd April). www.ft.com/content/10d8f 5e8-74eb-11ea-95fe-fcd274e920ca.
The COVID-19 pandemic has created unprecedented challenges in every sphere of our lives and education is not out of it. With schools shut across the world, millions of children have had to adapt to new types of learning. This resulted in the largest “online movement” in the history of education with approximately billions of children around the world became homebound, together with their parents and extended families. Recently, a report of CNN has confirmed that even though the COVID-19 situation becomes stable, several universities in the USA have decided to consider the possibility that in-person classes may not resume until 2021. During this crisis, everything has happened so fast that it does not seem realistic to adopt a holistic solution that is easy to implement, and that works for everyone (Moorhouse, 2020). The pandemic is a monster situation to deal with, but we can tackle it following a prophylactic approach. So, I inspire individual solutions based on contextual needs.
The whole world has witnessed a paradigm shift in its teaching-learning-assessment process recently. So, the developing countries are no exception. For instance, in Bangladesh, irrespective of all levels, teachers have started teaching online despite several challenges. The government has also encouraged to go online to continue the teaching-learning process of the country during the pandemic. Teachers use different platforms to teach online. As there is a government directive, the primary and secondary teachers of government schools use Bangladesh Television (BTV) as a platform to teach virtually. The BTV announces the schedule of classes on different topics before the live session so that students can learn whether or not the class lesson is relevant to their level of study. In this regard, non-government schools are free from governmental directives. So, non-government schools have multiple platforms to conduct virtual classes apart from BTV. Most of the schools use Zoom or Google Classroom as their online teaching platforms although there are several challenges, such as lack of uninterrupted power supply with continuous access to the internet, unavailability of digital devices for each student, and the unavailability of well-trained teachers to conduct the online classes smoothly. In this regard, there is a huge possibility that the current paradigm shift of teaching virtually may exacerbate inequalities in education between developed and developing countries across the globe. In practically, in the post-pandemic context of education, online classes may become a regular thing in parallel to in-person classes depending on how the situation emerges. So, it’s important to get it right and make sure that no group of students is being left behind in the process. I have tailored some of the practical issues to conduct online classes in developing countries.
Access to ICT
One of those major challenges to the teachers of developing countries is access to the online mode of education to conduct classes virtually. Most of the students in the developing countries lack technical support such as unavailability of the internet or mobile device with a data pack or Wi-Fi connection to be connected to the virtual classes. OECD (2020) reported that a gap is seen across countries and between income brackets within countries in terms of students’ struggle to participate in digital learning via reliable internet access and/or technology. The report showed that 95% of students in developed countries such as Switzerland, Norway, and Austria have a computer to use for their schoolwork, whereas only 34% of students in Indonesia have a computer with internet access to do their schoolwork. So, it can be assumed that access to a computer with internet access may be similar in other developing countries such as Bangladesh or Nepal. Again, the number of computers owned by families, especially in the rural areas of the developing countries are presumably lower than the urban areas, which can have a negative influence on the whole online education. Moreover, in the developing countries, to conduct the classes online, the cost of the internet or mobile data-pack is beyond the reach for many students as well as the institutions. So, online teaching to all the students is a far cry from what is intended in the developing countries, such as in Bangladesh.
Willingness to communicate online
Another huge challenge to online teaching is the learners’ willingness to communicate (WTC) in the extramural digital environment. As most of the students in developing countries are not familiar with digital platforms, many of them are not enthusiastic about the transition to online learning. Students’ lack of online experience may promote fear and lead to their participation uncertainty. The fear can also cause withdrawal or resistance to their online participation. Therefore, it is a huge challenge for the teachers to remove this barrier to engaging his/her students virtually for the online teaching-learning process. A teacher should know how to apply different theories on virtual interaction such as activity theory of learning. Only then teachers may be able to engage the students in an interactive mode. If teachers can do so, it can be a great opportunity for them to teach interactively online in a real-time situation.
Online collaboration
As we know that the classroom situation in developing countries is more or less is lecture-based. In most Bangladeshi schools, teachers are usually the speakers or controllers of the classroom and the students are passive recipients of the course contents. So, making a collaborative and participatory classroom in a face-to-face situation has always been a challenge for the teachers. However, at present, the teachers from the developing countries have the opportunity to create a collaborative class online as several researchers (Rana, 2018; Shaista, 2018) found that students become more participatory in digital classes than physical classes. In Bangladesh, despite various obstacles, about 80% of the students in a university have expressed interest in joining the online activities (“ [Shorkari Bisshobiddaloi] সরকারি বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়ে,” 2020).
Motivation for online learning
Teachers and students harbour their motivation for learning. So, during the COVID-19 pandemic, many students may lack the psychological readiness for online instruction. Even the teachers themselves may lack motivation for online teaching. Recently, in Bangladesh, the Education Minister pointed out that most of the teachers in the government institutions lack a positive mindset and the motivation to shift in-person classes on virtual mode during the COVID-19 pandemic (“[Shorkari Bisshobiddaloi] সরকারি বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়ে,” 2020). Students may also have misconceptions concerning online learning and its outcomes. They may consider this ‘paradigm shift’ as temporary resulting in their lack of motivation towards online learning. So, it is the responsibility of teachers to motivate the students that online instruction is necessary for collaborative learning and not a substitute to merely keep students busy until the pandemic subsides. Teachers also have to motivate students to shift focus away from the emotional consequences of COVID-19 to more personal investment in learning and achievement.
In this regard, I can share my experience. I have been running ELT classes on ZOOM since March 2020 for my students. I run three classes per week for this group. After overcoming the initial teething troubles related to technology and the new mode of teaching, participants have settled down and attended online classes regularly. I have motivated them to embrace this new teaching-learning situation. However, it is surfaced that the prevailing online mode of education (both public and private) is undergoing some teething troubles to adapt online exams and evaluation procedure for obvious reasons I have referred to. So, it is too early to comment on how successful the online teaching-learning activities have been until it continues at least for a considerable time.
Nonetheless, it has already been reported in different newspapers that there are more challenges to conduct online classes in rural schools due to the issue of urban-rural contextual dichotomy. However, my argument is that digital tools can be used as a catalyst to remove the urban-rural disparity and to put all the students on equal footing, then distance or institution won’t be a matter! The government just needs to take the initiative to create a level playing field. If we can ensure the internet for everyone with a digital device and train up the primary and secondary teachers to pick up digital literacy, more than half of the work will be done to transform our education online. Other petty technical barriers can be dealt with accordingly. Moreover, third world countries like Bangladesh, where face-to-face education is considered as a reliable but hefty medium, can take the current situation as a good opportunity to change its typical lecture-based classroom into a collaborative online classroom.
The upcoming world is going to based on digital platforms so do the educational skills. Without digital literacy, it may be difficult for students to survive in the academic arena. Therefore, after the post-pandemic reality, all schools should be equipped with digital support so that face-to-face teaching can be underpinned by the online learning scope. Without access to the world of websites, it is not possible to enter into the ocean of unlimited knowledge. By ensuring access to the body of world knowledge, there is a possibility to make a knowledgeable and techno-savvy generation to transform the country.
So, it is necessary to train the teachers with different online learning models (such as TPACK framework) as they are the main players to implement the process. The training should prepare the teachers so that they can interweave the three essential sources of knowledge ̶ technology, pedagogy and content to facilitate synchronous online learning to the students through a collaborative approach. All the students should be ensured a digital device with better internet connectivity so that they can have the access to the internet to browse any particular academic site related to their course contents or course lessons anytime and in anyplace. Therefore, the learning will be ubiquitous, no matter a student stays in rural areas or urban areas, and learners will be able to learn at their own pace. However, the major challenge is left with the policymakers as they need to figure out how to reach each of the student irrespective of rural and urban contexts. On the one hand, the COVID-19 has stagnated the whole world, and on the other hand, it allows us to think about the transformation of our education system for the future.
S M Akramul Kabir is an Assistant Professor of English under the Directorate of Secondary and Higher Education, Bangladesh. He has just completed his Doctoral journey and is waiting to be a graduate of the University of Canterbury with a PhD degree. He has taught English to both local and international students for more than 12 years. His areas of research interest include listening skill for language education, discourse analysis, learning theories, and ICT in language education.
References
Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Adaptations to a face-to-face initial teacher education course
Shaista, R. (2018). The effect of training in Mobile Assisted Language Learning on attitude, beliefs and practices of tertiary students in Pakistan (Doctoral dissertation). https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/457
COVID-19 has been one of the critical human crises ever recorded after Plague of Justinian (541-542), the Black Death (1346-53), Spanish flu (1818-1819), Asian flu (1957-1958), HIV/ AIDS (2005) and Swine Flu (2009). Following the advice of WHO about maintaining physical distance to control the possible spread of the virus, the government of Nepal had announced the nation-wide lock down, and the four-month long lockdown has been recently waived though the educational institutions seem to shut down for some more weeks. During the ongoing crisis, the venture taken by some of the proactive teachers to continue teaching-learning activity to the extent possible for them and to engage themselves in continuous professional development is appreciable.
It was, undoubtedly painful for me to be detached from my students and the classroom for a long time. However, what made me satisfied was the constant contact with the students and colleagues via different digital means. Although the online classes were not as effective as the physical classes in the beginning, they remained a useful alternative to practise teaching-learning activity during the lockdown period. So, in this article, I have attempted to explore the ground reality of teaching learning from a survey and critically reflect on my teaching-learning and professional development practices including my feelings during the lockdown.
Digital divide deteriorating teaching-learning activity
Problem with the technology more or less exists in every nook and cranny of the world but the digital divide in our context seems bigger. For example, Sharma (2020) reports that only 8% of households and 12% of total schools have broadband internet facility in Nepal. Although 90% of the population use mobile phones, the majority of them do not have the internet facility. Similarly, Rana, Greenwood and Fox‐Turnbull (2019) show that only 72% of the total population of Nepal have the internet access and the majority of them (95%) are mobile data users, and mobile data is too expensive to use for educational purpose. Moreover, the urban dwellers have better access to the internet facility (not in the reach of all though). Indeed, this kind of disparity is present in the online classes that I have been taking at present, where there is the presence of less than 50% students. The condition is even worse in the case of the rural part of Nepal, which is waiting for the development of the internet infrastructures and access to web technology.
Professional development in the crisis
Although teachers are not physically present in the classrooms, some of the active teachers are busy taking the online classes or continuing teaching-learning via other alternative means. On the other hand, during the lockdown period, various national and international organisations were active in organising e-conferences and webinars for teachers’ professional development. I also participated in some of the webinars organised by Cambridge University Press, Webinar Series: British Council and NELTA, Continuous Proficiency Development Institute (CPDI), Thailand and TESOL Virtual Convention and English Language Expo 2020.
Having got opportunities to participate in these webinars and conferences, I was acquainted with new trends and ideas of English language teaching. So, they proved to be highly insightful for me to gain and share new knowledge and skills. I have used the learnt knowledge and skills in making the lessons interactive while teaching in the online environment. Moreover, I also utilised the crisis for creative writing and reflections, and also used them in my online classes to encourage my students to compose creative writing. History shows that there has always been the emergence of new literary figures and a new field to work with by the established figures due to the situation created during and post crises. So, as a teacher, we can encourage and support our students to express their emotions, feelings and experiences through creative writing or other forms of arts, which can help them to release their tensions and have a sense of achievement in the form of creation.
Teaching-learning practice during the crisis
Exploring the ground reality
Like other teachers, I always enjoy having students around me, but the ongoing health crisis caused havoc in teaching-learning activity with the temporary closure of the educational institutions globally, where Nepal couldn’t be exception. Some of the schools in Nepal, especially in the urban setting, have run the online classes by using different digital apps where there is internet facility and parents are capable enough to manage basic technologies for online classes. However, student participation in such online classes are observed low.
It is commonly reported that there is less student participation in the online classes and the delivery of lesson also has not been as effective as the face-to-face mode. Therefore, I wanted to understand if other teachers have similar problems. I conducted a survey by using the Google form about teaching-learning activity during the pandemic, where 48 teachers participated. The data showed that the majority of teachers faced the problem of low students’ participation. Additionally, some other problems mentioned by them were related to technology and learning environment like unstable or lack of the internet access, frequent power cut and learners’ unfavourable learning environment at home. Likewise, lack of apt digital contents were reported as another challenge. Similarly, challenges were reported on students’ involvement and learning facilitation like lack of students’ attention, disturbances at the students’ end, low participation in English course and lack of student-centred activities. In addition, the teachers also reported to have challenges in assessment including the lack of immediate feedback to students.
The responses of this brief survey indicate that online teaching cannot replace the physical classroom in Nepal immediately as there exist major challenges like technological preparedness, online pedagogical innovation, lack of digital contents and assessment. In such situation, the government in collaboration with public and private sector should come up with immediate strategies to reach students and also should envision to bridge the digital gaps in future.
Facing the crisis as a teacher following alternative ways
While some of us are taking initiative to run online classes to the limited number of students having with access to the stable internet and digital devices, Dawadi, Giri and Simkhada (2020) argue there exists a huge challenge to give equitable access to e-learning to all the students in Nepal and a swift move to e-learning will further widen the disparity gaps, depriving a large number of students from inclusion. This study, therefore, indicates that we need to adopt different modalities to reach to different students based on the means of connection they have. For instance, we can provide offline materials to students having mobile phones and computers without the internet connection. On the other hand, for the students having neither the internet nor the digital devices, we should reach via radios and televisions as some of the teachers have already taken this initiative. For example, the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology and local bodies are telecasting and broadcasting educational programmes via radios and TVs though people are skeptical about the effectiveness of such teaching-learning. On the other hand, to reach the students of difficult topography, we should deliver the print materials in coordination with local government. Moreover, teachers can also reach them and engage in teaching-learning by maintaining physical distance in their own locality.
Crisis and some food for thought on our practices
The present health catastrophe, I believe, is questioning our education system and has compelled us to rethink the way we are delivering public services like education and health. Our existing education system emphasises more on competition, i.e. producing a successful person is getting priority over helping a person become a good human being. With the same token, society gives value to the rich and this has led them to achieve more power. The existing gap between the rich and the poor is constantly increasing, which is visible during the crisis, where the poor suffered the most and the marginalised and minority people were much more affected. Education and health services are highly dominated by the private sector, which were already out of the access of the working-class people, seemed more unwelcoming during the crisis for many private hospitals denied treating the patients suffering from the corona virus. This was the failure of the present neoliberal society which emphasise privatisation, marketisation, and deregulation in various services including education and health sectors diminishing the nation’s role in these sectors of fundamental necessities.
Summing up
Similar to English proverb “there is a silver lining in every black cloud”, I also tried to make the best ultilisation of the time I had in the crisis. I first focused on my professional development, especially ways to teach students online effectively. Then, I have been using the new knowledge, ideas and skills I gained from it in my own online classes. Now, my students in the online classes are no more passive listeners but the active co-participants of the teaching-learning activity. I use Easy Class and Google Classroom to manage my online classes. Likewise, to make the online lessons interactive, I use various digital apps and tools, such as online quiz using quizizz, Kahoot, ProProfs, Mentimeter, interactive videos using playposit and padlet to ensure learners’ participation in the online class and Google forms for feedback and for online test. After lockdown, I am confident that I am going to make visible changes in the lesson delivery in the physical class and the blended mode of teaching and evaluation. Moreover, I feel that the crisis in general has taught us an important lesson that Nepal also should envision alternative ways of teaching-learning by using various digital technologies.
Pushpa Raj Paudel, an M. Phil scholar at Nepal Open University, is a faculty in Sainik Mahavidyalaya, Bhaktapur. Mr. Paudel has interests in creative writing, teachers’ professional development, critical pedagogy and translation. Mr. Paudel, a life member of NELTA, has presented papers in various national and international conferences and webinars, and has published articles in various magazines and newspapers.
References
Dawadi, S., Giri, R. A., & Simkhada, P. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on the education sector in Nepal: Challenges and coping strategies. Sage Submissions. Preprint. doi:https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.12344336.v1
Rana, K., Greenwood, J., & Fox‐Turnbull, W. (2019). Implementation of Nepal’s education policy in ICT: Examining current practice through an ecological model. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries,86(2), 1-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12118
“Children learn what they live”. It is one of my favourite poems written by Dorothy Law Nolte. Throughout my 15 years of work in education field in Nepal, this poem always reminds me of my ongoing quest, which is to understand what children should experience at home. Facilitating children’s learning at home and empowering parents to support in their children’s learning is proved to be more important at the moment where the schools are closed. Therefore, this article offers some practical ways to bridge the gap between what theoretical knowledge children acquire inside four walls of the classrooms and what experiential learning opportunities parents can offer at home. It discusses the importance of educating parents regarding how they can contribute to their children’s learning at home and school.
Importance of parent education: My reflection
Academic achievement of a child in Nepal is mostly based on theoretical knowledge. However, some exceptional schools provide students with good environment and ample opportunities for experiential learning. In any case, schools alone cannot help individuals achieve success in life. As a teacher educator, I have visited more than twenty districts across Nepal where I got opportunities to work with various primary and secondary schools. During my visit, I was interested to explore the relationship between parents and schools, and parents involvement in their children’s learning. Most school communities understood that parents involvement means forming a Parent Teacher Association (PTA) that holds meetings sometimes only to have general discussions regarding students’ assignments, stationary, school infrastructure and so on. It was disheartening to notice that most of the schools did not pay any attention to the fact that parents can play an important role contributing to their children’s learning and overall growth at home and at school and learning can go beyond school boundary. All parents including those who are illiterate can be trained to be the ideal contributor.
While working for Rato Bangala Foundation some years ago, I was involved in a five-year long child-centred teacher training programme implemented in around six hundred schools in far- western Nepal. At the end of the project, we visited many cluster schools for monitoring and evaluation purposes. Many teachers in those schools expressed their concerns that it was challenging to improve children’s learning outcomes without the parents’ support. They reported that the children who were irregular at school were either busy in household chores, for example looking after their siblings, or working in the field. There were times when students stayed absent for a week or more even on occasions such as a distant relative’s wedding or a minor ritual in their neighbourhood. The teachers further complaint that many parents did not care about their children’s dress up, regular diet, health and hygiene. To our surprise, some children, especially girls, even used to bring their younger siblings to their classrooms to look, which would distract the whole class. What a teacher shared with me about a parent’s view, still hovers around my mind, “What’s the significance of sending my child to school? He can rather be a helping hand at home!” It was evident that many parents were illiterate and immature for good parenting and taking responsibilities of their children. That trend of parents to be irresponsible was not just because of poverty, child marriage, family break ups and lack of education but mainly because it sadly became part of the community culture. An important lesson learnt from that experience was that parents education and involvement in children’s learning plays a vital role in the learning achievement of children. In response to the findings of the monitoring and evaluation process, our organization then began to work intensively to run series of workshops for educating parents. To the best of my knowledge, there is a limited attention paid to educating parents to support Nepal government’s initiation of parent involvement and I feel proud to be a part of that movement.
In yet another experience, while working for an organization, we managed to incorporate parent education as a component in our training programme run in a mountainous district in the eastern region. I found it challenging to motivate headteachers and teachers to spare time to run workshops for parents on good parenting and involving parents in their children’s learning. However, once we did start working with parents, we were amazed to see the result. Parents easily accepted the change and happily began to participate in various school activities. For example, some parents visited their child’s classroom and shared the skills they knew. They set up a trend to read with their children at home and even those parents who could not read began to listen to their children reading to them or have meaningful interactions with them. It was a successful practice that helped to improve the parents’ relationship with the schools. Consequently, children began to take library books back home regularly, fill in the reading logs, try bringing healthy snacks to school, and most importantly they began to look quite clean, happy, and cheerful. Moreover, they looked very proud when their parents made an effort to visit their classrooms and shared any of their life skills ranging from the skill of brewing tea to kitchen gardening.
Parents’ contribution at home while schools remain closed
Finally, building upon my learning about the significance of parents’ involvement in children’s education and addressing to the current scenario of school closure due to the pandemic, our team have developed a set of guidelines for parents for our partner schools. Here, I have briefly shared some of the steps that I think parents can take away to guide their children:
Raising awareness about ecology: Parents can explain with an example, how human actions affect the environment and living organisms around them giving an example how throwing rubbish in a clean river can pollute water and poison fish which in turn can lead to various diseases such as cancer, when consumed. They should teach children how they can contribute to save mother earth from home by engaging them in the process of:
practicing to reduce wastage
making compost from food waste, and planting trees and flowers
recycling, reusing or reducing plastics
loving and caring animals in their surrounding
Boosting a child’s social skills:These tips can help parents to develop the social skills in their children. Therefore, parents can be requested to;
Spend about 15 minutes of quality time with their kids, telling them stories and biographies, reading aloud and trying to use good words at home learning to teach new words.
Try to interact with their children in their mother tongue.
Always listen to their child and acknowledge what he/she has to say.
Showcase good social behaviour such as showing respect and speaking politely to others as the children are good at imitating us.
Raising physical awareness:Parents can follow these simple instructions to help their children achieve overall physical wellness:
Prepare healthy food as much as possible for children avoiding regular junk food. A balanced diet is important for wellness.
Teach them good personal hygiene such as washing hands regularly using soap, brushing teeth, wearing clean clothes, and keeping nails trimmed.
Teach them basic movement skills such as catching, hitting, jumping, throwing, and running. They can actively play games with their children and make them practice focusing more on participation and enjoyment rather than winning.
Help children grow spiritually and emotionally:Parents can focus on these tips to attain proper spiritual and emotional growth:
Spend some quiet time with their children in nature and meditate with them.
Teach them to express love and gratitude to nature and the community.
Demonstrate how to solve issues without becoming violent and teach that we should control our emotions.
Teach them various acts from a young age such as making their bed after waking up, thanking someone for their kindness or service. This is to help them develop good habits for their future.
Parents should always try and identify their child’s strengths, abilities and interests in particular areas of learning, i.e. sports, music, arts, language, nature, mathematics, society, culture, and so on. Also, they can work with the people in the community to improvise their daily activities to incorporate in their child’s learning when needed. One can always consult elderly people from their community how various skills, culture, and traditions were passed being transferred from their ancestors and see how they can adapt the ideas to their teaching.
Conclusion
The present havoc created by pandemic and the closure of educational institutions around the world has compelled us to redesign the school-centred teaching learning and institutionalize the role of parents particularly in facilitating children’s learning at home. The joint effort of schools and parents will definitely produce better learning outcomes of the children. Therefore, it is a prime time to work on parents education so that children can get better academic support at home too. Moreover, the aware parents can also equip their children with important life skills, which can help them to fit well in this century. Although these aspects are addressed across the school curriculum, in the present context, children’s learning inside the classrooms is not connected with what they experience at home. The educators, on the other hand, should create and make a meaningful connection between teaching learning in the classroom and activities at home. Likewise, apart from contributing at home, parents’ regular participation in the school programmes is very crucial and they should be encouraged to spare some participating in the schools events, interaction and activities. Parents are the best educators who can provide their children with an opportunity to learn by experiencing above mentioned fundamental skills.
Babita Sharma Chapagain is associated with Integrative Education Research and Recreation Centre and also works part time in Himalayan Trust Nepal. She earned her MA in ELT from Kathmandu University and completed another degree from the University of Warwick as a Hornby Scholar. She is interested to work in the areas of classroom based research and integrated education.
In this write-up, I reflect on my experience of shifting my academic activities from office to home, and from a face-to-face mode of delivery to a virtual one. When the Government of Nepal announced a complete lockdown on 23 March 2020 to prevent the people from the spread of Corona virus infection (Pradhan, 2020), all my academic activities came to a standstill. I am teaching three courses this semester; working as a member of the editorial board for Journal of Education and Research; supervising dissertations of Master of Philosophy students; and performing other administrative duties mostly related to the University Grants Commission, Nepal and my institution. A sudden change from free and independent being on the 23rd of March to a captive like one on the 24th of March with the inception of lockdown completely changed my physical as well as mental activities. Like all my fellow human beings across the globe, I also started living with unknown fear and anxiety.
We are locked down. The streets are deserted. Departmental stores are closed. A few corner shops are still open. People rush to these shops. Everyone has a long list to buy. People buy rice, pulses, flour, etc. Everyone standing there is not sure to get what he/she wants. Stocks are running out. It has been about a week since we had our vegetables. Everyone is masked. You do not recognize even your neighbour. People do not talk to each other. They have forgotten to smile. Everybody is in a hurry. Uncertainty is there. I remembered the medicines. I had to procure essential medicines. I rushed to the hospital pharmacy. I sanitized my hands. I showed the prescription to the pharmacist; he had a snap of it with the camera of his mobile phone. He showed me the amount in his calculator. I asked for the usual 10% discount on life-saving medicines. He looked at me as if I just arrived from the Mars.
Lockdown completely affected my daily activities. I began to wake up late. I changed the way of life. I gradually got adjusted to the lockdown style. I revived regular television watching after fifteen years. Watching television became my everyday routine. The harrowing news of Italy, Spain often terrified me. The focus gradually shifted to the USA, not because the situation in Italy and Spain were improving but because the conditions in the USA were getting worse with the 45000 + death tolls. I do not know much about this virus; I am not a medical professional. I am now familiar with COVID-19 Pandemic vocabulary like ‘social distancing’, ‘washing hands’, ‘flattening the curve’, ‘quarantine’ , ‘isolation’, etc. and many dos and don’ts. While writing this, many more people are being infected and more are dying. I do not know how many more will get infected and lose their life by the time I conclude this write up.
In a situation like this, along with my university colleagues, I decided to go for online classes. I am concerned with how we teachers are adjusting to new environment posed by this virus shifting our mode of delivery from face-to-face mode to ‘hopping online’ to use Tse’s term (Tse, 2020). This is the time we are passing through. Although lockdown was implemented from 24th of March 2020, regular university activities got affected from the third week of March. We stopped thumb signature and started signing attendance in a register. The canteen was almost empty. We already started getting terrifying news of deadly virus. The Government asked to close everything but essential services. Our university closed regular face-to-face classes. And the news from across the globe became scary the week before the lockdown. We sensed the situation would get worse. Some of my colleagues tested online classes and we shared our experience with each other in a virtual meeting through https://meet.google.com/_meet on Saturday afternoon. After sharing the experience of test classes, we decided to continue the classes online.
Moving from face-to-face to ‘hopping online’ delivery mode
Teaching online has not been completely new for me. My training as a linguist and, particularly using computer software for analyzing linguistic data, taught me handle the situations of teaching online with minimum of adjustment. I have been teaching students through both face-to-face and online and distance learning (ODL) modes for five years now. Before the COVID-19 Pandemic, my university used the MOODLE portal for the delivery of ODL mode; the learning materials were uploaded and the students used the materials wherever they were. The MOODLE has limitations; mostly its activities are asynchronous i.e., the students do not meet the teacher in the same time. Teachers rarely have direct discussion with the students. In our context, the students who were delivered through MOODLE hardly completed the courses. All my courses were uploaded on the MOODLE portal but students rarely visited them. However, I was planning something different from the MOODLE. I had my first online class with Masters of English Language Teaching students. This semester I am teaching the course Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis. My usual face-to-face class begins with the presentation from one of the students. Each student is assigned a particular topic to present to the class on the very first day of session. We were still learning all the features of https://meet.google.com/_meet and my student presented her paper without sharing to everyone. However, she did well.
My experience of teaching students through ODL mode informed me that students are more expressive in online mode than in face-to-face mode. However, the challenge is to provide opportunity to speak to each student. Therefore, I tried to ensure everyone participate in the discussion as much as possible. For 22nd March 2020, I planned to teach Speech Event, a topic closely related to Speech Act Theory (Austin, 1962), the topic I took up previous week. The first thing that I had to do was to prepare my students to recapitulate what we discussed the week before. I shared the PowerPoint slides and asked them to concentrate on two sentences there: I christen this ship the Joseph Stalin; I now pronounce you man and wife.
I asked them to do two things with these sentences; first change the tense of the verb into past and change the subject from first person singular to second or third person. After that I asked each of them to observe the effect on semantics. Unmuting the microphone button in meet.google, my students shared that changing the verbs into past tense and replacing the subject with second or third person would have completely different effect. Recollecting the class previous week, they also shared that ‘christen’ acts as ‘naming’ and ‘pronounce’ acts as ‘giving the bride and groom the status of husband and wife’. I told them that verbs like ‘christen’ and ‘declare’ not only say something but also refer to certain kinds of acts and such verbs are called ‘performatives’ (Austin, 1962).
After sharing their first ever-online learning experience, I asked them to identify appropriate context for each of the sentences. After a while, they came up the ideas that the appropriate context for the sentence could be; the ship is manufactured and yet to make her maiden voyage, a respectable person like mayor of the city or owner of the company is giving the name to the ship in a special function.
The appropriate context for the second sentence is: a wedding ceremony is taking place in a church and, most probably, the priest declares the bride and the groom as man and wife. These contexts refer to speech events in which individual speech acts perform various functions. In this way, in our almost two-hour class, my students analyzed several conversations between a doctor and a patient in a hospital, between a waiter and a customer in a restaurant and between a host and a guest at dinner in former’s house. Finally, each of them reflected their experience on the first ever-online class. One of them said that she lost her internet connection for a while and lost some of strands of the discussion. Others expressed they were excited as they found it very much similar to face-to-face mode of delivery. On 31 March, I had second online class with these students and we all were more equipped than before.
On 24th of March 2020, I met with third semester students of MPhil in English Language Education at five in the afternoon. I have been teaching a course on Contemporary Thoughts on English Language Education this semester. From my experience with master students, I understood that my presentation needs to be redesigned to fit in online mode of delivery. Unlike in face-to-face mode, each student is not seen on the screen, getting engaged throughout the class time is a big challenge in an online class. I redesigned my teaching items. As we competed the Module one that discussed the theoretical aspects of Post-Colonialism through face-to-face to mode, Module two was to apply the theoretical insights of Post-Colonialism to English studies. I started the class with three questions:
How many varieties of English can you think of? Can you name a few?
What particular variety of English do you speak?
What variety or varieties do you think should be considered “proper” and “correct”?
I asked them to ponder over five minutes; after five minutes I asked them to speak one minute each on any one of the questions. This made me assured that everyone is connected and participates in the discussion. I intended two major areas to cover that day: the spread of English over the ages and the concentric circles of Kacharu (Kacharu, 1985). When each of them spoke, I asked them to mute the microphone as the background noise caused disturbances. Then we discussed the spread of English in four phases: within the geographical region of present United Kingdom; America, Canada, Australia and New Zealand where majority of people speak English as first language; in the third phase, after the 17th century onwards English speakers took English to their colonies where a large number of people speak English as an additional language; and , the fourth phase, English spread because of technology, globalization and education to the countries that English speaking people never colonized. Most of the interactions concentrated the discussion on the phase III and phase IV because these two phases had direct link to our discussion on Post-Colonialism. Students enthusiastically participated in the discussion on the impact of English in our education and socio-cultural life.
Majority of the students were aware of concentric circles of Kacharu. They initiated the discussion and I intervened only when there were digressions. When the fundamental concept of Kacharu’s notion was established, I gave them ten minutes to find out three advantages and disadvantages of Kacharu’s circles in the study of varieties of English like English in Nepal. In these ten minutes they googled, discussed with each other and came up with ideas to discuss with the class. Each of them got two minutes to talk share their ideas. In this way class ended.
I spent an entire week teaching the second module of the course Trends in Applied Linguistics to the students of MPhil in English Language Education doing through block mode. The lessons were redesigned to fit in two hour teaching/ discussion sessions and one hour student’s presentation.
Students’ response on ‘hopping online’ delivery mode
Students have mixed reactions on the online classes that I have been delivering so far. In an unanimous voice, my students take these online classes very useful considering the difficult situation that the Pandemic has created. Many of them are happy that shifting to ‘hopping online’ mode of delivery saves them maintain the academic calendar without losing the academic year. Some of them took the online classes as ‘exciting’ as they are getting familiarized with the technology and enhancing ‘the virtual communication skills’. These online classes keep them ‘in track’; provide opportunities for ‘uninterrupted learning’; they are ‘as effective as face-to-face classes’; and they are ‘wonderful’ and ‘energizing’.
On the other hand, these online classes also have other side of the coin. One frequent issue that students encounter is the intermittent internet connections. Many of them get lost because very often they get disconnected to the internet and lose the flow of discussion. One of the students felt that discussing something serious without feeling the presence of the interlocutor puts him in an awkward situation. Getting used to new mode of learning from face-to-face to complete online mode needs to make them accept psychologically. They are tuned to learning in front of teachers and peers in the physical classroom and sudden shift to ‘hopping online’ mode of delivery causes them to ‘get distracted’, and these distractions lead to ‘mess up assignment’ and online mode offers ‘limited opportunities for interaction’ i.e., online classes means ‘reduced interactions’. One of the greatest disadvantages of online classes is to miss the original charm of meeting teachers and peers, the process of socialization and feeling the physical presence of someone when we are engaged in academic discussion.
In spite of these issues, reflecting on their experience on online classes, they consider these online classes are best possible options for the current situation. They also believe that they will overcome the trauma, anxiety and unknown fear and psychological state will accept the condition leading to more active learning. One of my students says that he finds difficult to concentrate on the topic while attending online classes but he thinks as time passes his nerves will align with the tune of the situation.
Conclusion
These online classes taught me several things. The way I used to get prepared for a face-to-face class is not sufficient and many things of my face-to-face class are completely irrelevant in an online class. I prepared my online classes, tested several times and reached my students. I also realized that using videos or other forms of materials require to ensure whether the tool supports these materials. Shifting from one tool to another always creates a havoc and we end up in a mess. The usual way of going to the class with a reading material and make the students read and discuss simply does not work in an online class; teachers have no way to monitor the active participation of students in the activity. In this particular area, I would love to listen from the experience of colleagues.
In these two weeks of intensive online teaching, my interactions with my students made me realize that, as a teacher, I learnt from the collective conversation with my students. To be honest, I have learned more from my students than I have taught. The questions, comments, critiques and insights of my students reshaped and challenged my academic position and such activities contributed to knowledge building. This shift to online mode has almost killed these opportunities; it may have new offers but it is too early to realize.
I deeply distressed with the ideas of some paranoids that post-corona era is the era of the death of physical classrooms and an era of revolution in online classrooms. I do not expect such radical changes in our educational system because physical contact is equally important, not only for education, but also for living. At this difficult juncture of life, I went for online because I, as a teacher, have to facilitate my students to the maximum and I did not have any other better option than going online. In the present state, I agree with young lawyer of Anton Chekhov’s story ‘The Bet’ ‘It’s better to live somehow than not to live at all’(Chekhov, 2015).
[Note: since you have come up to here reading it, please share your feeling, feedback or any question related to it in the comment box below, which will encourage the author. Thank you!]
The Author: Educated in India, Nepal and Germany, Dr Tikaram Poudel currently teaches at the Department of Language Education, School of Education Kathmandu University, Nepal. Dr Poudel is well-known for his studies on morpho-syntax and semantics of case, tense, aspect and field linguistics of South Asian languages. His studies on the interface between ergativity and individual level predication, cumulative and separative morphology and affix suspension have been well received. Recently, Dr Poudel has been concentrating on the socio-cultural impact of English on contemporary Nepalese society.
References
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Chekhov, A. (2015). The bet and other stories. (S. Koteliansky, & J. M. Murry, Trans.) Boston: John W. Luce & Co.
Kacharu, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification, and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk, & H. Widdowson, English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and the literature (pp. 11-30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pradhan, T. R. (2020, March 23). Nepal goes under lockdown for a week starting 6 am Tuesday. Kathmandu. Retrieved April 7, 2020, from https://kathmandupost.com
Tse, J. (2020, March 19). Letter to students past and present. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/42264494: https://www.academia.edu
Dr. Karna Rana is an Academic Coordinator [MPhil in English] at Open University Nepal and Lecturer of English at Gramin Adarsha Multiple Campus. Dr Rana facilitates teacher training for teachers and students in and about online classes and resources. He earned his PhD degree in ICT in Education at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand. He did an MA in Education (E-based learning; Inclusive education; Managing teaching and learning; Research Methodology), from the University of Bedfordshire, UK. He is one of the members of the editorial board of ELT Chourati. He has authored and co-authored several academic papers and research articles nationally and internationally. He has launched different online-based training and workshop to contribute to Nepal’s ICT enhancement procedure. His interest areas include ICT in education, digital literacy, research and education.
Our Choutari editor, Ganesh Kumar Bastola, has talked to Dr Rana about COVID-19, pandemic pedagogy and its impact in and around Nepal specifically in education and explored some useful strategies to enhance online classes and resources during pandemic. Now, here is the exclusive interview for you.
1. What can be the impact of COVID-19 pandemic in our education system?
Well, if we review the history of educational development and the impact of such crisis like World War I and II on social transformation, the rise of industrial education value dominated neo-classical education value and it gradually resulted in capitalism. Before these wars, work efficiency used to be valued more than what education qualification someone had. The current industrial education system that came out of British and American neoliberal ideologies seems to be outdated as it is eventually failing to fix issues of this crisis. If the pandemic continues throughout this year, the world will be in an economic and humanitarian crisis. Many schools and universities will be shut down. Nepal will also experience it if the situation lasts long.
2. Since the educational institutions are shut down and the ‘face-to-face’ mode is put to halt. What can be the alternatives to reach students, especially school students in this crisis?
Since the world is in lockdown, several universities and schools mostly in developed countries have switched their traditional physical classrooms to online classes or distance learning mode. Unfortunately, the majority of schools and universities might not be prepared for it. Let’s observe the context of Nepal. Except for Nepal Open University, an online university, all other universities are not fully prepared to go online. It is unlikely to move schools to online in this situation as the majority of people live outside the range of broadband internet. However, we can utilise a few potential technologies like television and radio to deliver limited courses and engage students in possible projects.
3. How can we ensure and track the learning of school students if we adopt alternatives to educate them?
Let me share how schools before 2028 BS used to educate children in villages. Even the government did not know the number of schools across Nepal but these schools had their own curriculum to meet individual as well as social needs. The majority of schools particularly primary ones were never connected with the national examination system but they were efficient to educate millions of children. It does not mean to revive the system but we can explore such efficient local schooling ideas to make schools resilient and self-efficient. That was the time when there were few literate members of the community, but now we have educated or at least literate family members who can be teachers of their children. We have municipalities to follow micro strategies to engage teachers and students from their home. Probably flexible curriculum may provide schools with opportunities for developing own learning programmes, learning materials and outcomes. Of course, national education policy can provide them guidelines to maintain the education standard. Municipalities can be a focal point to manage local resources like teacher trainers, experts, teachers, learning materials and other essential materials. The wise use of ICT in education may develop our schools and education for the growing generation. FM radios and local televisions can be utilised to reach out children and their parents can be engaged with them. In cities and towns, internet facilities can be more productive. There may be challenges for ICT illiterate teachers to gather digital content and materials for teaching and learning but they can be shortly trained through radio or television to use smart mobile or personal computer to explore online materials.
4. What are the differences between online teaching-learning materials and face-to-face teaching-learning materials? As the academic session is going to kick off soon, how can we use the existing materials and resources for teaching via online, radio, TV or so on?
Teachers can bring some laboratory works and concrete materials in the traditional physical classroom but digital learning materials can be animated or real videos, audios and audio-visual. For many learners, online materials can be more productive than what they can read in library books. Unfortunately, such online materials cannot be shared without the internet. As I said earlier, the Education Unit at municipalities can look for ICT experts across the country to train local teachers on how to use digital devices and digital materials in teaching and learning. At least local authorities can train few teachers to plan and deliver lessons on TV lively and even students can be allowed to talk to the teacher over phone. It can go live on the radio too. By listening to the radio, students can work with pen and paper. In cities and towns, teachers and students can be shortly trained to use free apps like Skype, Messenger and Viber, and to communicate through emails. Teachers can utilise these free apps and emails to share learning materials and go to live interaction. Teachers need to have minimum ICT skills to operate these technologies. Unfortunately for many teachers, these advanced technologies may be intimidating. In that case, local teachers can be allowed to choose local learning materials for students. It can develop local autonomy and students’ independent skills. Both students and teachers can use print materials as a source of content. School and local libraries can be developed as a learning hub.
5. You have been facilitating the graduates at Open University, Nepal. What particular strategies do you employ for an online-based classroom to make the students engaged and make teaching-learning activities effective?
We have basic ICT infrastructure to plan and deliver lessons. We basically use MOODLE to share digital content with students, give feedback on students’ regular works and assess their works. Microsoft Teams connects students and teachers and they have a regular video conference on it. It is a dynamic tool to share screen and present works. I can create teams of any number and schedule meeting for the team. This application is highly advanced for online teaching and learning which allows us to share heavy contents like movies or large size videos and digital books. The whole class can be recorded and students can download it whenever they want to. Students from their home or comfortable place can join the class and share ideas. Actually, everyone works on their devices while they are in an online class with their teacher and friends. I teach a research course and it requires students to work on their area of research. I provide live feedback on their works and they actually work with my feedback. It is really effective, interactive and productive as we work while we discuss. I don’t go for a lecture.
6. As the pandemic hit us, we do not seem ‘prepared’ to deliver teaching-learning using alternative means. Firstly, the majority of teachers themselves do not seem to be well-equipped to employ alternative means. So, what skills should the teachers acquire to run alternative teaching-learning and how can we develop their capacity?
Yes, we may be immature to think about moving all schools online in this situation. As I explained earlier, the majority of schools don’t have ICT infrastructure and teachers may not have minimum ICT skills. We cannot expect students to have expensive internet and computers, particularly in rural remote villages. I have reported several challenges including a lack of ICT infrastructure, teachers’ ICT literacy and government preparedness in my research publications (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/KarnaRana). I wish the government would have enacted its educational policy in ICT and plan itself without relying on I/NGOs for the past two decades. If the government has a proper plan to equip teachers with ICT, the local governments can be involved in the project. In a cluster of many teachers at the local level, they can be trained to operate a computer and use internet facilities. Teachers basically need minimum computer skills, ICT literacy, information literacy, digital literacy, media literacy and communication literacy. Unfortunately, it is unlikely to train all the teachers across the country now. The educational crisis is apparently caused by unpredicted pandemic COVID-19 and such crisis may turn up time and again. Can we think a new way of schooling much more resilient than just internet-based school?
7. People also have started speculating that the online means can replace the face-to-face mode of teaching-learning in future. To what extent is there gravity in this speculation in terms of Nepal? And to what extent do we need online means?
I don’t think so. Internet can be used as a means but not as a replacement. There are predictable challenges like network crash, piracy and cyber-attack. Internet is based on the ideology of a few developed countries and they can hold the power of it. Let’s not imagine the worst but who knows if they destroy all the mechanisms of the majority of the countries. From my knowledge in this area, I would never suggest totally going to online. Of course, we can utilise internet facilities and develop the mechanism of e-learning to complement social learning strategies. Thinking about absolutely online school in Nepal may be an immature idea. The landscape of the country, weak national economic condition and expensive technology will be great barriers ahead. Poor people cannot afford such an expensive education. There are practical issues like how we can conduct actual laboratory works, how children learn to socialise and what kind of world we expect to be. I would rather think about how to develop the best practice that suits our local context.
Note: Now the floor is open for you. We encourage you to drop your comments in the box below after reading the interview. Your constructive feedback and questions inspire the interviewee. Thank you!
