Introduction

English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) is the educational approach in which English is used to teach all subjects. The use of EMI involves teaching subjects from the academic curriculum, for example, Science, Maths, and History in English, where English is neither the native nor the dominant language in school, college, or university. Consequently, English becomes the medium through which a student learns, instead of being taught as a subject itself. I focus on English as a medium of teaching in language policy and planning. When I look back at the history of Nepal, the English have no colonial past. However, it has maintained a major ideological influence since the Rana dictatorship. When Rana Prime Minister Jung Bahadur Rana first visited Britain, he was drawn to the use of the English language. He brought two Englishmen, Mr. Ross and Canning, to teach English to his children. Since then, English has become widely used and popular in Nepal. It has caused societal division by reinforcing inequalities in education, opportunity, and cultural identity. At the time, Rana Prime Minister, including Jung Bahadur Rana, created a schism among his family members when he stated that he would forsake everything and teach his children English.  Nepal cannot remain unaffected by the global growth of the English language. It is included as one of the languages spoken in Nepal in the Constitution of Nepal 2015. In Nepal, English is taught as both a topic and a medium of education. Since their inception, most private schools have used English as their primary medium of instruction. Community schools are primarily Nepali medium schools, although EMI is now considered a need in many schools as well. EMI is causing friction between private and community schools in Nepal. There is a common notion that private schools celebrate good results because of EMI. However, their success is due to a variety of circumstances. As we all know, Nepal is celebrating its diverse language, religion, ethnicity, and race. Despite its modest size, the country is rich in language and culture. The documents include the Nepalese Constitution 2072, the National Curriculum Framework 2076, the Education Act 2028, the School Sector Development Plan, and the School Sector Reform Plan 2072. Multilingual education initiatives focus on mother tongue-based multilingual education, particularly at the primary level. However, these documents, notably the Basic Level Curriculum 2076 (Grade 1-3), expressly state that English can be used as the medium of instruction for subjects like as Science and Mathematics. So, these materials are confusing educators.

 Institutionalization and Socio-economic Impact of English

Institutionalization and Socio-economic Impact of English, the introduction of English into Nepal’s Schools has drastically shifted the educational and social landscape of the country. Initially introduced in Nepal during the Rana regime as a sign of elite status and modernity, today, the English language is a powerful form of social mobility and academic status (Bhattarai & Basnet, 2020; Pennycook, 2018; Saud, 2020). English is now being taught and is increasingly being used as the medium of instruction in private schools, and for teaching in public schools. This shift shows the belief that knowledge of English brings quality education, global prospects (Adhikari, 2021; Sharma & Thapa, 2022). English is a language linked with power and a similar form of status in society. Even less advantaged families like to send their children to private schools as a result of EMI opportunities. The spread of EMI in private schools happened very quickly, and now private schools are popping up everywhere. Even at the local government level, they are encouraging EMI in Dipayal, Silgadhi Municipality and Doti by making EMI compulsory at the local government level. Such efforts surely show their enthusiasm for English. The establishment of English in the institutional context of Nepal has profoundly changed the educational space and society in Nepal. English, which was introduced into the country during the Rana regime as a marker of elite status and modernity, has evolved into a powerful vehicle for social mobility and academic prestige. English is now taught and is also frequently used as the medium of instruction in private schools, and increasingly in public schools. This shift reflects an underlying belief that proficiency in English brings quality education, global opportunity, and upward social mobility. It is connected with power and distinguished status in society. Even low-income families prefer to send their children to private schools due to EMI. It has spread quickly, and private schools are mushrooming. Even the local government is encouraging the English language in Dipayal, Silgadhi Municipality and Doti, and they have made EMI compulsory at the local level. This kind of exercise certainly demonstrates a love of the English language.

Social Justice through EMI

The use of EMI in Nepal’s education system affects the potential for social justice. It creates unequal access to the quality of teaching provided by EMI. Students from urban, high backgrounds admitted in present-day private schools receive a rich education, while students from rural, i.e. low-income backgrounds have limited access to and practice with English, especially in community schools. Students from urban, high-income backgrounds who are admitted to private schools. Recently, they received a wealth of educational resources, while students from rural, low-income backgrounds have little access to and practice of English, particularly in community schools (Bhattarai & Basnet, 2020; Timsina & Rai, 2019). This is not just an academic disadvantage for community school students, but a social reproduction disadvantage. English is a vital and crucial part of employment and the upper social class (Sharma & Thapa, 2022). Likewise, EMI is associated with colonialism, Western culture. This is the disadvantage of community school students in terms of not simply academic outcomes, but also social reproduction. English is a major and essential part of employment and higher social standing. Similarly, EMI is linked with colonial influence and Western culture. Hence, EMI develops the disintegration of multiple indigenous languages and cultures, with destruction, linguistic inequality and cultural detachment of Nepalese students. Language and culture are interrelated with each other when language enters the nation; it inherently brings its culture. Not all students have the same access to English. Children from rich or urban families often go to private schools where they learn English. But many poor or rural students go to local schools where English is not taught well, or not at all. This creates a big gap in learning. I have mentioned subtopics about social injustice below.

Access and Variation in Education

Ethnic and linguistic minority students’ experiences show that the separation between private and public education in Nepal deepened by the introduction of EMI. Private schools as one of the most well-resourced and culturally competent educational forms in the country, which offer high-quality EMI programmes for wealthy and prosperous families. Community schools, in contrast, work with families representing rural, low-income people.  The inequalities linked with education lead to collected effects on the lives of oppressed families and students who cannot afford private schools and are unable to get quality education.

Neglecting people and Cultural perception

 The practice of English-only instruction in education and public life results in the social disuse of languages like Doteli, Maithili, Tamang, Newari, and others. As parents work to give their children better opportunities, they encourage their children to speak English, and younger generations are abandoning their languages altogether. These parents are unknowingly sending messages of cultural disconnection and eventually loss of language. The emphasis on individual economic advancement negates Nepal’s multilingual identity and values. The present generation is taught English, leaving their mother tongues.

Socioeconomic Stratification and Symbolic Power

 In Nepal, the ability to speak English is becoming a social marker for intelligence, achievement, and social status. Students with fluent English abilities will command a greater amount of respect and access to higher education, government work, and business opportunities in society. The symbolic power of English establishes class boundaries, because only individuals who are recognized can afford EMI-based education. Thus, another protector of advantage is language, namely, the exclusion of individuals who cannot engage.

In Nepal, the importance of English has led to the marginalization of other native languages. Marginalization means the inconsequence associated with what is not major, not central, and not powerful. In Nepal, English is preferred in every sector, including education, banking, hospitals, and so on. Private schools teach in English, and students who speak good English are often given more respect and better opportunities. Because of this, many parents want their children to learn English instead of their own mother tongue. As a result, local languages like Doteli, Newari, Maithili, Tamang, Tharu and many others are being used less, especially by young people.

In higher education, government jobs and business English are often liked. This makes it harder for people who speak only Nepali to compete. When one language becomes more powerful, others slowly lose their importance. This is how English, even without meaning to, is pushing local languages aside. The government even mandates English as a subject in the early grades. It has been made a compulsory subject from grade 1 to the bachelor’s level. It has secret power in Nepalese society. In the context of Nepal, many parents prefer to send their children to private schools. English is synonymous with high-quality education in Nepal. Privatization in education is widespread in Nepal. Private schools are proliferating and offer English-medium teaching. Such private schools reflect English culture, including Halloween. English has had a significantly greater influence on the local language, culture, and identity.

Conclusion

Overall, the article analyses the essentialist celebration of English as a neutral instrument of development. It advocates for a more critical and socially just approach to language planning that recognizes English’s potential for global utility while also protecting linguistic rights, cultural heritage, and equitable access to education. Stunning, this balance is essential in supporting Nepal as it negotiates its multifaceted identity and aspirations in a globalized landscape. In Nepal, many local schools are switching mediums of instruction from local languages to English as the medium of instruction. While Nepal is a UN state that has a language in education policy, which was developed upon recommendations to educate children in their mother tongue and promote bilingualism for better long-term learning, the policy is hardly followed in practice. The official approach, as mother tongue-based multilingual education is encoded, has been replaced with EMI, which runs counter to its intentions. The transition to EMI was fast-tracked after Nepal adopted a federal system of government in 2015, where local governments had power over local language policy. Although this national plan (2016-2023) sought to endorse local languages, almost all local governments, especially in urban areas, have chosen EMI.

 References

Adhikari, R. (2021). The impact of English as a medium of instruction on indigenous languages in Nepal. Language Policy and Society, 7(3), 210–225.

Bhattarai, M., & Basnet, J. (2020). English Language Teaching and Social Stratification in Nepal. Nepalese Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 78–95.

Kafle, N. P. (2023). Language policy and practice in Nepal: English as a medium of instruction. Journal of Language and Education, 9(1), 45–62.

Pennycook, A. (2018). The cultural Politics of English as an international language. Routledge.

Saud, M.S. (2020). English medium public schools in Nepal: A new linguistic market in education. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language, 23(2), 319-333.

Sharma, S., & Thapa, D. (2022). English-Medium education and social inequality in Nepal: A critical overview. International Journal of Multilingual Education, 14(2), 102–118.

Timsina, L., & Rai, P. (2019). Multilingual education and policy challenges in Nepal. Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 33–47.

Author’s Bio: Mr. Nar Bahadur Bist is an ELT practitioner from Doti, Nepal. He is currently pursuing an MPhil in ELT from Kathmandu University, School of Education. He is an English instructor at Seti Technical School, Rajpur, and a secondary-level teacher at Martyrs Memorial Residential Secondary School, Doti. His areas of interest include English language teaching, linguistic study, EMI and ELT study of language, and teacher professional development. He can be reached at narbist22@gmail.com.