I came from a small village to pursue an M.Phil. degree at a well-known university in Nepal. This journey has profoundly transformed my life. It has been marked by numerous challenges, an enduring quest for knowledge, and the courage to embrace opportunities that once seemed beyond my reach. My story is not merely about academic achievement; it is also a reflection of perseverance, personal growth, and a deep sense of purpose that has shaped my identity as a lifelong learner.
The Humble Beginnings
I was born in a remote village in Nepal, where access to schools and other essential services was limited due to the distance from major settlements. When I was a kid, a lot of families in our town did not think school was important. There were few schools, and the streets were filthy. Almost all children, particularly girls, were expected to toil in the fields or around the house rather than going to school. My parents, however, never went to school themselves, but they knew how important it was to learn, and always told me to study. My parents always pushed education but did not have much money or options. And my farmer father used to keep saying, “there is an entire world outside our village”. Learning will help you. These are the words that sustained me in the beginning. I didn’t have a lot of options or friends who leaned into my hopes for education, so my own resolve was my closest friend.
The Struggle and Spark of Early Education
The schools in my village were far from ideal. They faced persistent challenges, including a lack of qualified teachers, overcrowded classrooms, and outdated teaching materials. Despite these limitations, my desire to learn remained strong and motivated me to pursue education with determination. I sometimes had trouble understanding ideas that seemed hard at first, especially since I did not have a focused academic environment that would encourage me to ask questions and learn more. I stayed focused on my schoolwork even though these things were hard. In fourth grade, I learned new ways to learn from a teacher who had just started at the school. For example, she encouraged me to ask questions and think for myself. At this point, I wanted to know more. I began to view school not as a tedious obligation, but as an opportunity to transform my life. Even though a lot of my friends dropped out of school to help their families, this new excitement kept me going on my path to study more. I discovered during these critical years that school was not only about getting good grades but also learning to change both my life and other people’s. After that, I thought about school differently, and although it was a long way off, I knew if I wanted to get out of my neighbourhood, then I was going to have to work harder than everyone else.
A Turning Point in Secondary Education
When I moved up to high school, it was a big deal. My family did not have enough money to send me to a high school in the nearby town, so I had to go to school by myself. I had to walk for kilometres every day to get there. At that point, I started realizing how difficult it was for so many kids in rural Nepal to pull themselves out of their circumstances because of the social and economic obstacles they faced. Yet I did well in school and got good enough grades to allow me to apply for scholarships. When I received a scholarship to attend a school that was actually good and nearby, it felt like such a huge step in the right direction for me. For the first time, I was in a room with other students who wanted to learn the same things as I did, and it was a better place to be educated. Better teachers, more subjects, higher standards – it is hard but inspiring. I just really loved the environment of research and learning. At that time, I did a lot of academic competitions, science fairs and debates. They helped me get better at thinking critically, talking to people, and solving problems. These things I did outside of school not only helped me do better in school, but they also helped me become a better leader, which was important for my future studies.
University Life: The Beginning of a Scholar
I moved to the capital city after high school to go to college. I grew up in a village that did not have libraries, journals, or seminars, so this was a big change for me. The change was scary because it meant moving from the country to the city, which was a big change in culture and school. It was hard for me to get used to the city because it was so big, the pace of life was so fast, and the schools were so good. I got used to it quickly, and the university gave me more than I could have ever hoped for. This is when my love of research really started to grow. I pushed myself to the limit with the hard work of college life, but I liked the challenge. I learned that education isn’t just about memorizing facts; it is also about coming up with new ideas, testing what you already know, and helping to make discoveries. While I was in college, I took classes in the humanities, social sciences, and how to do research methods. These classes helped me understand how society changes and how education is a part of that. These years helped me figure out what I wanted to do with my M.Phil. because I became more and more interested in going back to school and doing research in the academic world.
The M. Phil. Journey: Getting Good Grades in School
The decision to pursue an M.Phil. stemmed from years of diligent effort, introspection, and a profound aspiration to effect change through research. M. Phil. has been a blend of scholastic hurdles, personal development and career progression. Amid the city’s clamour, a riot of noises fills the air, many of them clashing like squabbling musicians. Giant skyscrapers lit up with fluorescent neon light sparkle, stabbing into the night sky and casting long winter shadows. This bizarre glow blankets the city below them. A numbing crowd for pedestrian movement. In firecracker-like succession, the smell of grilling food on the street side mixes with the fumes of gaseous states. This is all a sort of overdose from the saffron aroma that lingers for plenty long time afterwards. For all this mayhem, there’s an unmistakable vitality that flows through the city. It’s a relentless heartbeat that pushes things into the night.
Thinking about the Past and the Future
I can see how far I’ve come since I went to a small village school that didn’t have many resources. I am now an M.Phil. student at a well-known school. My story demonstrates that education can change lives and the importance of continuing to push forward when things are tough. I am proud I have come this far, but I also recognize that this is not the end of the road. I will endeavour to apply what I learn from my country and community as I work through more studies. I also want to inspire others, who may be people of colour, to follow their dreams and complete their education. There are many stories like mine about students from rural Nepal who work hard and stay focused to get to the top. I am the living evidence that knowledge is power and holds the key to a brighter future. I am not even close to the end of my journey, and every new thing I learn and can do makes me feel like the quest for knowledge is an infinite process that I will continue as long as possible and it’s worth all of the struggles I encounter along the way.
Author’s Bio: Mr Arjun Jung Rayamajhi is an MPhil scholar in English Language Education at Kathmandu University. He is a secondary-level English language teacher at a community school in Nepal, where he has been actively engaged in classroom teaching, academic mentorship, workshops, and training. His research areas are ICT and ICT-based teaching. He can be reached at arayamajhi16@gmail.com.
Language is the main means of communication, and the goal of English language instruction is to provide pupils with the ability to understand and use the language orally and in writing. It also bridges the ideas and emotions of communicators. This study focuses on the difficulties Bachelor Level students at the Aadikavi Bhanubhakta Campus, Damauli, Tanahun encounter when learning English as a foreign language (EFL) in the classroom, with a particular emphasis on their reluctance to speak the language fluently. The study investigates the causes of this reluctance, including the impact of mother tongue and culture, deficiency of motivation, conventional teaching methods, and an unbalanced emphasis on particular language abilities. In-depth interviews with four bachelor-level students from various language and cultural backgrounds are conducted as part of the research’s qualitative design. The results show that the student’s reluctance to talk in English is caused by various factors, including the prevalence of their mother tongue, cultural norms at home, a lack of drive, and conventional teaching approaches that place a higher value on written than oral fluency. The participants offer strategies to deal with these issues, highlighting the necessity of peer group discussions, interactive and communicative teaching methods, and activities encouraging student autonomy. They support an adaptable method that lets students from multicultural and multilingual backgrounds express themselves freely without worrying about making grammatical or pronunciation mistakes. The study highlights how crucial it is to establish a welcoming and inclusive learning atmosphere to improve.
Language helps to exchange information, news, feelings and many more between or among conservationists. It also helps share fears, tears and cheers among speakers and listeners.Nepal is a country of cultural, religious and linguistic diversity. After the implementation of the Interim constitution in 2007 AD, the dawn of multilingualism and multiculturalism was heralded in Nepal. It states that Nepal is a secular, multilingual and multicultural country.
The constitution has stated that receiving a basic education in one’s mother tongue is a fundamental right. Subsequently, the Ministry of Education (MOE) in its 2007 National Curriculum Framework for School Education stated the need for acknowledging local knowledge, cultures, and languages in schools. According to the current Constitution, Nepal is a secular, inclusive, democratic, socialism-oriented state where we can perceive that “All the Nepalese people, with multiethnic, multilingual, multireligious, multicultural characteristics” (Part 1, Article 4). “Every Nepalese community residing in Nepal shall have the right to get education in its mother tongue and, for that purpose, to open and operate schools and educational institutes, by law.” (Article 31).
The purpose of English language education is to provide students with the capabilities to understand the language appropriately and to have good ability in written and oral (Richard, 2008). Since English is an international and global language, it works as a passport for the conversation. It bridges between or among interlocutors. Listening, speaking, reading and writing are four language skills which are divided into two skills receptive and productive. Listening and reading fall under the category of receptive skills and speaking and writing are productive skills (Saraswathi, 2004). Speaking is the primary means of communication. Speaking skills are a must at any place at any time. It enables conversational partners to express inner feelings. It also fosters the analytical, interpretive, synthetic, evaluative, creative, and critical power of the speakers and listeners. In addition, it generates, articulates, fosters, convinces, persuades and sometimes distracts the conversational partners too. In the context of Nepal, it has been geographically and administratively or politically divided into different factors. Geographically or naturally, it has been divided into the Himalayan region, the Mountainous region and the Tarai region. The majority of people from Thakali, Tamang, Lama, Gurung etc live in the Himalayan religion, Magar, Gurung, Brahmin, Chhetri and other castes live here. In addition, Danuwaar, Rai, Limbu, Lepchaa, Waaiabaa, Shah etc live in the Tarai region. They have their typical language and culture. National Education Policy 2019 states “management of multilingual education based on mother tongue, Nepali and English as a medium of instruction in addition to the mother tongue according to the linguistic diversity of Nepal, children’s interests and needs.” (Policy 10.8).
As a faculty member in the English Department, at the same aforementioned college, i.e. Aadikavi Bhnubhakta Campus , Quality Assurance and Accreditation (QAA) -certified affiliated college of Tribhuvan University, I have been teaching English to undergraduate students mainly from the Humanities and Social Science Faculty, Management and Education Faculty for 5 years. Nestled in the western part of Nepal, the campus has been the intellectual hub of English education for mainly the students of Tanahun, Lamjung, Gorkha, Nawalpur and other adjoining districts. English has been a charming subject for many aspiring students mainly female, ethnic, indigenous, Dalit and many more who are planning to go abroad and who long to be English teachers. One interesting point is they are from different linguistic, cultural and socio-economic backgrounds and abilities and have their own peculiar speaking English experience. An individual owns his/her language and culture. (Chand, 2020) stated, “Our community is mixed up with people from these diverse cultures.” So are in the classroom. Previously, i.e. before conducting this research, I guessed that there was variety and prosperity in speaking English in such a multilingual and multicultural class but it was beyond my expectations when I talked with them so I had a keen desire to research it.
However, most of them belong to lower socio-economic families and they do not have good skills in English because of their origin, i.e. the influence of mother tongue, lack of confidence, practice interaction, home environment, community school background, lack of exposure, fear, lack of motivation and feedback, teachers’ interference, fear of making mistake and poor English background. When it comes to speaking skills in English in different contexts such as delivering a speech, participating in speech contests, individual presentations and interaction, I particularly found students from bachelor-level students even who are majoring in English at the campus are unable to properly speak English fluently, and unhesitatingly communicate in different contexts. Students even majoring in English who hesitate to communicate properly in English without hesitation seem to be challenging not only for students but also for me as long as I have been teaching English over the last twenty years from the grassroots level to the Bachelors’ level in different public and private schools and colleges of Nepal.
Purpose of the Study
This research paper, ‘Learners Hesitation in Speaking English in the English Classroom in Multicultural and Multilingual Context ‘ aims to diagnose critically the scenario of English language skills mainly speaking skills from different perspectives in the aforesaid campus. The chief purpose of this research was to find out the main components that have obstructed Bachelor Level students of the aforementioned college in English EFL classrooms. The main target of this research paper was to investigate the main causes of hesitation and suitable alternatives to solve them.
In addition, it aims to explore why the students are lagging in nurturing their speaking power and how this problem can be sorted out with specific strategies or solutions with the interconnection of existing policies of multilingualism and multiculturalism. The final motto of this research is to enable students to separate whether nurture or nature is more important in speaking English. Eventually, it targets to chase perfection and pleasure in speech. If not, they are received, they are likely to bring excellence and hope. This results in a win-win situation.
Research Questions
The undivided purpose of this research is to find out the situations, components and appropriate solutions hesitation of students while communicating in an EFL classroom and outside its periphery. I designed research questions clinging or sticking to my objectives. My research purpose bound me to design my main question in the given ways:
How is the speaking scenario of their college and how do they feel while teaching or learning to speak English in multicultural and multilingual contexts?
To ease, lead, further my research and reach the knowledge construction level with step by step-by-step procedure, I designed the auxiliary questions which are listed below:
What are the problems they are facing in such a context?
How can we solve these problems?
Theories Implied
Nepal cherishes the diversity of its languages, cultures, and religions. Nepal’s Constitution has acknowledged the value of multilingualism and multiculturalism in the nation. Every Nepalese community living in Nepal is also guaranteed by the Constitution the right to receive an education in their mother tongue and the right to establish and run schools and other educational facilities for that purpose.
For pupils to have effective written and spoken communication skills, as well as proper language comprehension, English language instruction, is essential. The two categories of language skills—receptive and productive—are speaking, listening, reading, and writing. Speaking is the most important form of communication and is necessary everywhere, at all times.
In this research, I have used Constructivist and Communicative constructivism theory. Constructivist theory is a post-structuralist theory of evolution and development that deals with knowledge construction and learning. It explains how structures, language activity, and meaning are developed. According to Burleson (2007), constructivism is a general theory of communication skills that examines skilled behaviour concerning three major communication processes: social perception, message production, and message reception. The author describes some of the background factors that lead some people to emerge as highly skilful communicators and others as less skilled.
Communicative constructivism elaborates on social constructivism and links it to Habermas’ theory of communicative action. It considers knowledge, body, performance, and objects as part of communicative action. The CLT approach allows both teachers and students to transfer their traditional teaching and learning beliefs into an innovative teaching and learning approach. For example, a well-known educator (Dos Santos, 2019a; Dos Santos, 2019b) in language learning advocated that today’s students like to use technological-assisted materials and tools for language learning, such as social media platforms and internet chat groups. To meet the needs of these students, such visual and interpersonal communicative tools must be created and employed.
Methodology
I chose an interpretive research paradigm for the study. This is a qualitative research design study. Narrative inquiry is a qualitative methodology of studying the experiences of participants through a recollection and spontaneous narrative of lived stories and events. (Clandinin and Huber,2010). For this purpose, four bachelor-level students of the aforenamed campus from different language and cultural backgrounds were interviewed and information was collected. Among them, one of them was from the Muslim community, next from the Magar community, another from the Gurung community and the final one was the student who was reared in India with a different culture where Panjaabi was used as the main language. The selection of the students itself was diverse and inclusive by nature so I expected unique output or results too. For that purpose, I interviewed them in depth and collected the data. Next, I used a mobile phone and recorded the audio interview. Being an interviewer and researcher, I filtered, evaluated and analyzed the transcription. Finally, I drew out the conclusion. Besides, different sources, I visited and surfed various research sites, blogs, and websites as secondary sources for this research.
Every individual has the right to secrecy. Even the constitution of Nepal has such provision for the right to privacy. Article 28 of the Constitution of Nepal, 2072 BS, explicitly outlines the right to privacy. It stipulates that the privacy of an individual’s life, residence, property, documents, statistics, correspondence, and character-related matters shall be inviolable, except when constrained by the law. Confidentiality and ethical issues are utmost in any research. For that motto, the names of the participants are changed into pseudo-names to preserve anonymity. Among them, the first participant is named Mr A, the second one is Ms B, the third participant is Ms C and the fourth or final one is Ms D. Likewise, the original words of the participants are written to maintain the trust and originality of the research.
Discussion and Findings
Speaking skill is the buzzword and popularly demanded practical skill in today’s world. However, it has been just like a fishbone stung in the throat to those who are studying English as a second, third or fourth language in multilingual and multicultural contexts. There are reasons behind it though it needs one and all. Hesitation has been a chief hindrance to sharing inner feelings because of which the voice that is supposed to be expressed or heard always remains in a vacuum. For that, they express their problems being hesitated and have come up with specific measurements too which work as a catalyst to boost their speaking skill. With the in-depth interview of four bachelor-level students, the interpretations are made here.
Theme 1 : Influence of Mother Tongue and Culture
Home is the first school of the child because either civilized or educated culture and language or barbarous or know-nothing culture begins from home. The child learns the first language at home. The ability to communicate effectively in English exemplifies the correctness of pronunciation and intonation and directly affects the appropriate communication in conversation (Zhang & Yin, 2009). Mr A, Ms B and C belonged to Muslim, Magar and Gurung communities respectively. According to them, they were highly influenced and dominated by their mother – tongue, culture from home and dominance of teachers. Mr. A said, “I could not speak English unhesitatingly because of the influence of culture. I had to recite Quaran and Namaz instead of reading and speaking English. Not only that, they spoke Arabic, and Urdu at home instead of Nepali. When I joined in school it was too difficult to learn Nepali and English simultaneously so I was lagging in English because they were his third and fourth languages instead. Further, he added his anecdote when he was in school. He said, ” My school used to call every student one by one to deliver the speech in the class in English period but I was almost hopeless and my mind went blank. The teachers were nitpickers and only criticised grammatical errors, pronunciation, and tone. I was almost paralysed and could not express my view in the way that I expected and speak nothing due to the interference of my mother tongue and culture.” But what he now opines is that he is a little bit improving due to peer talk at college and school since he is a teacher too. He also added that the memories of those days sometimes haunt his college, and professional life.
Similarly, Ms B and C were dominated more than Mr A due to the excessive use of their mother tongue at home and even at school. Ms B said, ” I was reared in a monolingual and monocultural society where all the neighbours belong to the Magar community who only use their mother tongue and culture. When she went to school too, she found almost the same environment because more than 90 % of students and personnel of the school belonged to her community. When I was called to speak last year in the class, I was almost dumb and could speak nothing due to hesitation that was because of the interference of my mother tongue. The reason behind it was that we hardly practised English so I felt hesitant while speaking in college and public. Now I had a little bit of improvement in speaking when I started interacting with my teachers and began working as an English teacher in a private school in my locality.” The story of Ms C was also interesting who belonged to the Gurung community. She said, “Our English teacher learnt the Gurung language and taught us to translate in that language when we did not understand English. How could we speak English in school when we could not understand and speak Nepali either? It has hindered me in my college too. Now I have started teaching in public schools where English is used as the medium of instruction so I should say there is a green signal of change in my speaking ability. ” Likewise, the fourth one Ms D said,” I was reared in India. Though people thought I had good English speaking power it was not in the past and is not at present either due to the influence of Hindi and Punjabi. Our neighbors and schools focused on those languages, nevertheless English. I hesitated due to distinct accent, tone, and pronunciation in my college since Punjabi and Hindi have dominated my English”
Theme 2: Lack of Motivation
Motivation is a state of cognitive arousal or internal drive that pushes someone to do things to do something. It is the heart of learning. It reduces tension, energizes and activates the students. But the participants are far-flung which is one of the core causes of hesitation of motivation. It is mentioned in the literature that motivation is a key to students’ learning success (Chinmoy, 2007). In this sense, motivation is a key consideration in determining the preparedness of learners to communicate. Zua (2008) further adds that motivation is an inner energy. She says that no matter what kinds of motivation the learners possess it will enhance their study interest. However, I have found distinct data in this research. This is the case with one of the participants Mr. A expressed that his orthodox and strict father never allowed him to read loudly nor speak English at home, though he was too willing to learn, talk, and lead ahead. He added, ‘My family environment discouraged, demoted, and hesitated me to speak and improve my English.’ Another participant Ms B had a different version in this case. She said, “My family, school, and surroundings had hegemony of the Magar language and culture. I should say my luck was fifty-fifty and I enjoyed listening to English speaking mainly during festivals and holidays when my neighboring brothers and sisters who came to the village from the town had gone for study purposes and foreign countries for studies and jobs and conversed in English with their fellow friends. Sometimes I used to add ‘yes or no in the middle. That was that .”
Similarly, another participant, Ms C responded that teachers always used dogmatic and authoritarian styles since her school education till this date. She responded, “We were always criticized, ignored, and harassed while speaking English by our colleagues and teachers. The teachers only focused on grammar and pronunciation rather than fluency and content.” Similarly, the next participant Ms. D expressed that they never got an opportunity to share their inner feelings and opined that speaking English was a far cry from what she along with her colleagues had expected because the teachers used only teacher-centered lecture methods while teaching and they were never motivated to speak and use their feelings without hesitation. This shows that too much correction and interruption by the teacher discouraged learners and hesitation reigned over them.
Theme 3: Use of Traditional Teaching style
Teaching is an art which is to be updated according to time and situation. While doing research, I found that students hesitate to speak English because of the outdated monotonous teaching style. Mostly pedagogy is based on grammar translation and outdated theories and methods in remote areas to date. One of the participants Mr A said, “Our teachers rarely use interactive and communicative approach or true learning style to teach where students never shared their opinions because they only used chalk and talk principle though the projectors, smart TVs and multimedia devices availed in the college. It would add a cherry on the cake and we would be encouraged to express our inner desires and feelings with their proper use.” Though it is said that students are not empty pots waiting to be poured knowledge delivered by the teachers nor passive listeners rather they are to participate in the teaching and learning activities of the classroom, the teachers are still using deductive and teacher-centred lecture methods in the classroom where students can act nothing except yawning, moving limbs nonetheless uttering any English words in the forty-five-minute classroom. What can be more than this for the hesitation among students? Poorman (2002) observes that ” true learning cannot take place when students are passive observers of the process”. In addition, another participant Ms.D responded that our teachers only wrote notes on the whiteboard, which we copied and they used the grammar-translation method to make us understand but never asked us to discuss, analyse, comment, evaluate and interact on it which made us lag on speaking. This shows that students are presented as silent dummies or empty pots waiting to be filled by teacherly knowledge who do not act anything rather than considered bright sparks waiting to be ignited.
Theme 4: Biased Use of Language Skills
A vivid and effective communicative class is supposed to be the integration of the four language skills training, in which the teacher needs to establish a positive atmosphere, plan appropriate activities, encourage learners and deal with problems sensitively (Davies & Pearse, 2000; Jing, 2006). Although all four language skills, i.e. listening, speaking, reading and writing are equivalent. After researching, I found the reality a bit different. Participant Mr. A reported, “We faced hesitation to speak English because the teachers only focused on writing and reading skills nevertheless speaking and listening. We were rarely allowed to participate in peer group discussion, interaction, demonstration, speeching, even drilling, presentation, elocution, extempore, or group work which would comfort, ease, confide, explore, enrich, and ultimately enable us to express our feelings.”
Similarly, the next participant Ms. D stated, “Our exam system also has weakened and made us hesitate to speak English because it is based only on written skill. Even practical marks are often given according to written exams or class performance. The teachers also never let us involved in oral practical skills like speaking, listening, interacting and other works. To a great surprise even though all the language skills are intertwined and function like connecting the dots or chain of a bicycle, we practiced little reading. We buried our feelings deep in our hearts but never thought as potential seeds which are likely to germinate and quickly waited for the time when we could speak and express ideas but those days did not occur according to our expectations. We were instructed to write and reading as ivory tower and speaking as step- mother or sisters. We sometimes watched English movies or speaking videos on TV, YouTube etc in the classroom which was not adequate. ” This speaks that speaking classroom should never be under the teacher’s strict control where s/he uses chauvinistic dogmatism. S/he is to be dependent on what learners act or do, what they say or opine and what they realize or feel. The students deconstruct, reconstruct, reflect, experience, learn, unlearn and relearn more than tutored by the teacher.
Theme 5: Irrelevant Evaluation of Speaking Skill
Though speaking skills are the primary and productive skill of learning a language, participants B and C responded that it is illogical, irregular and irrelevant in their context. It is managed either before the annual exam once or practical marks are mostly given on a random basis where the halo effect and horn effect are likely to be practised. This sort of practice sometimes resorts to inviting dubious to find who are the goodies and who are the baddies in language skills. National Curriculum of English (2007) clearly states that all four language skills should be tested in the SLC exam. The school should conduct listening and speaking tests internally regularly, keep the records and send them to the concerned authority but it is not strictly practised from the grassroots, tertiary and upper,i.e. college or university level so that students can develop proficiency and confidence in language learning mainly speaking. Students require proper and regular feedback so they are to be given it from time to time. In a more recent study, Akter (2010) proved that giving feedback to the learner on their performance was an important aspect of effective teaching. To fulfil this purpose, a continuous speaking and listening evaluation system along with immediate and essential feedback is a must.
Solutions of Hesitation
There are no problems sans solutions. Every problem has its solutions and hesitation in speaking is no exception. Participant Mr A asserted, “Students with multilingual and multicultural knowledge should be motivated to use English easily where the language teachers are to be flexible, liberal in the class and outside.” In addition, it adds a few more stones to the foundation of speaking skills when teachers and guardians adopt a laissez-faire approach to practising English speaking because motivation triggers and inspires speakers to imagine and explore their creativity and imaginary power and speak since speaking is a production if they have nothing too in the minds. When interactive and communicative approaches based on discussion, interaction, debate, peer review, group work, speech, open free talks, elocution, and extemporisation are organised, they are bound to solve the hesitation problem of speaking English in class. Group or teamwork dramatically increases the number of talking opportunities for individual students. It is effective and achievement is more when they work together. In teamwork, the students can decentralize their work and can share views which is very interesting and full of curiosity about what will come after that. It develops the ability of patience, both hearing and sharing culture along with deep reverence for the co-conversationalist because every neighbour has a good story to tell, share, write or hear.
It also promotes learners’ autonomy by allowing students to make their own decisions in the group without being told what to do by the teacher (Harmer, 2007, P.166) His solution is when the teachers use these kinds of interactive modes, students slowly foster their speaking skills. Similarly, another participant Ms. C said, “Students from multilingual and multicultural backgrounds should be motivated to use English by applying flexible policy by the teacher rather than pointing and complaining about the small grammatical and pronunciation errors.” The unheard and untold contents, subject matters or stories from the students come on the floor if students feel comfortable and give an unhesitating ‘yes’ when they are told to speak or when they get an opportunity. Other suggestions to increase students’ motivation are shared by Liu and Huang (2010). They say that to overcome students’ lack of motivation, teachers can do activities like promoting students’ awareness of the importance of English, enhancing students’ interest in English, and developing their self-confidence They should be allowed to express the content unhesitatingly, nonetheless they are to be hurt. If so, they continue to suffer and deteriorate their speaking skill.
This shows that students feel at ease and enthused over speaking when they are free from personal, collegial, teacherly and public criticism and they have peace, energy and impulse in their minds and hearts when everybody appreciates them and their speech. As a result, students always feel completely at ease and are eager to throw their hearts and souls into the ocean of speech, speak and share ideas eventually.
Conclusions
In-depth interviews with four bachelor-level students from various language and cultural backgrounds are conducted as part of the research’s qualitative design. The results show that the student’s reluctance to talk in English is caused by a variety of factors, including the prevalence of their mother tongue, cultural norms at home, a lack of drive, conventional teaching approaches, irrelevant examination systems that place a higher value on written than oral fluency.
The participants provide solutions to these problems by emphasizing the value of peer-group conversations, communicative and interactive teaching techniques, and activities that promote student autonomy. They advocate for a flexible approach that allows kids from multiracial and multilingual backgrounds to freely express themselves without being constrained by concerns about spelling or grammar. The study emphasizes how important it is to create a friendly and inclusive learning environment to advance. The topics that arose from in-depth interviews with students are examined in the discussion section, with particular attention paid to the imbalance in language skill focus, the demotivating impacts of some educational philosophies, and the pervasive influence of mother tongue and culture. The investigation concludes with recommendations for resolving the issues that were discovered. The participants argue for a change in teaching techniques by highlighting interactive and communicative teaching approaches, stimulating peer group discussions, and fostering a flexible environment. To improve students’ speaking abilities and reduce reluctance, the need to establish a welcoming and inclusive learning atmosphere is emphasized. This adds to a thorough comprehension of the obstacles preventing pupils from speaking English successfully.
The study suggests a shift in teaching techniques, emphasizing interactive methods, peer group discussions, and a flexible environment. It emphasizes the importance of a welcoming, inclusive learning atmosphere to improve students’ speaking abilities and reduce reluctance to English language education. For that, teachers are the epitome and real leaders who are to know the route, show the route and go the route. The reason behind it is that one who always falls probably fails to tell others how to rise permanently. It strives its best to bring complete happiness and perfection. If not, it is, conversely bound to be hopeful and excellent in speaking.
Author’s Bio: Tirtha Raj Ranabhat is an MA/B.Ed. graduate from Tribhuvan University and is an M.Phil. thesis running learner in ELE at Kathmandu University. He is a life member of the Nepal English Language Teachers’ Association (NELTA) and also an assistant secretary of NELTA, Tanahun chapter. He has a wide experience of teaching English, from grassroots level to college level. Currently, he is working as an assistant lecturer at Aadikavi Bhanubhakta Campus Damauli, Tanahun which is a two-time QAA certified campus granted by UGC Nepal . He is also working as an assistant headmaster at Aadikavi Bhanubhakta Secondary School , Damauli, Tanahun , a sister institution of Aadikavi Bhanubhakta Campus Damauli, Tanahun.
References
Akter , L.(2010).Teacher talk time in ESL classroom in Bangladesh.Published M.Ed Thesis, BRAC University, Dhaka.
Chinmoy, Sri, (2007), How to Overcome Shyness. [Online] Available: http://www.srichinmoybio.co.uk/2007/07/how-to-overcomeshyness.html. (February 17, 2011)
Clandinin, D. J., & Huber, J. (2010). Narrative Inquiry. In International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 436-441).
Constitution of Nepal (2015). Nepal Government, Nepal.
Curriculum Development Centre (CDC), Nepal. (2007).Grade 10 English curriculum Sanothimi: Author.
Davies, P. and Pearse, E. (2000). Success in English Teaching, OUP Oxford.
Dos Santos, L. M. (2019a). English language learning for engineering students: Application of a visual-only video teaching strategy. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 37-44.
Dos Santos.., L. M. (2019b). Science lessons for non-science university undergraduate students: An application of visual-only video teaching strategy. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 14(1), 308–311.Available at: https://doi.org/10.36478/jeasci.2019.308.311.
Government of Nepal. (2019). Ministry of Education: National Education Policy, Nepal.
Harmer, J. (2007) The Purpose of English Language Teaching (4th edition).London: Pearson Longman.
Jing, W.U. (2006). Integrating skills for teaching EFL—Activity design for the communicative classroom. Sino-US English Teaching, 3(12).
Liu, Meihua., & Huang, Wenhong. (2010). An Exploration of Foreign Language Anxiety and English Learning Motivation. Education Research International, Volume 2011, Article ID 4931
Poorman, P.B. (2020). Biographyand role-playing: fostering empathy in abnormal psychology. Teaching of Psychology 29(12)
Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching Listening and Speaking From Theory Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Saraswathi, V. (2004). English language Teaching: Principle and Practice. Chennai: Orient Longman.
Zhang, F., & Yin, P. (2009). A Study of Pronunciation Problems of English Learners in China. Asian Social Science, 5(6). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v5n6p141
Zua, Li. (2008). Exploring the Affective Factors Influencing Teaching of Spoken English.[Online] Available: http://okarticle.com/html/Thesis/20080104/26.html (February)
English as a second language (ESL) first-year university students often face challenges with academic writing because of the linguistic, cultural, and instructional differences between the education system in the U.S. and their home countries (academic writing conventions in English and their first languages). This paper aims to present an ethnography of writing as a framework to familiarize the ESL first-year university students with the basics of academic writing, which directly speaks to the educational, social, and cultural contexts of U.S. higher education. The paper concludes that ESL students benefit immensely from using Grabe and Kaplan’s (1996) ethnography of writing as a framework to introduce academic writing in English to cope with their academic writing challenges.
Keywords: academic writing challenges; freshman ESL learners; ethnography of writing; U.S. higher education; linguistic, cultural, and instructional differences
My Tutoring and Teaching Academic Writing Experiences
I have gotten an opportunity to become an ESL educator for different aged students in different educational contexts. First, I have been an ESL teacher in Nepal. I have taught reading and writing to high school and undergraduate students. Second, I worked as a writing tutor at a regional level teaching university in the Midwestern region of the U.S. I tutored both domestic and ESL international undergraduate and graduate students. Third, I have been teaching reading, vocabulary, and writing courses in the Intensive English Language Program (IEP) at the Midwestern U.S. university for four years. Primarily, I follow a process-based approach (Zamel, 1983; White & Arndt, 1991) and the genre-based approach (Hyland, 2004; Swales, 1990; Tardy, 2008) to teach academic writing to my ESL students who come from diverse educational, linguistic, and cultural backgrounds. I guide my students by helping them explore resources, services, and contacts in and outside of the university. These learning resources are essential to alleviate their academic writing difficulties in the U.S. higher education context (Chauhan, 2021). Sharing experiences of ESL instructors’ academic journey, including coping strategies, is critical to improving their academic writing skills (Odena & Burgess, 2017). However, existing literature shows that academic writing in English is challenging for ESL students at both undergraduate and graduate levels (Chauhan, 2021) because they come from diverse social, linguistic, and cultural backgrounds (Duff & Anderson, 2015). The diversity of their backgrounds can also be an asset to acknowledge and utilize for enhancing their academic writing skills in English.
Nature and Scope of Academic Writing in Higher Education Context
Academic writing (AW) refers to the writing used in the college and university-level writing courses (Johnson, 2016). Additionally, AW has become the primary communication medium between scholars in academic subjects and disciplines in a higher education context (Greene & Lidinsky, 2015). AW is simple, clear, focused, and formal. It is also technical, objective, impersonal, concise, logical, and well-organized. An academic writer must meet genre-specific expectations and stylistic conventions (Ferris, 2018; Giltrow et al., 2014; Osmond, 2016; Starkey, 2015). AW is specific to context, task, purpose, and audience (Ferris, 2018; Grabe & Kaplan, 1996; Starkey, 2015). In parallel with these ideas, Gottlieb and Ernst-Slavit (2013) stated that“[t]he distinct purpose, audience, and context of communication result in clear differences in terms of language use in the selection of words, formality, sentence construction, and discourse patterns” (p. 2). AW is seen differently by scholars based on the features mentioned above. Osmond (2016) argued that AW projects writers’ in-depth knowledge, critical thinking skills, and analytical skills while studying different academic subjects within their disciplines and majors. It is also seen as an inquiry because writers can discover their values, beliefs, strengths, and areas to improve when they engage in the writing process (Starkey, 2015). Grabe and Kaplan (1996) recommended that each writer understands AW from the lens of an ethnographic approach. Echoing similar ideas, Ferris (2018) has summarized the features of successful academic writers and standards of writing used in academia.
Writers must have at least an adequate grasp of the content they are writing. They must understand the rhetorical situation, including the purpose of the writing and the knowledge and expectations of their audience of readers. They need to appreciate the constraints and boundaries accompanying genres, tasks, and text types. Further, writers need advanced control of the linguistic features (vocabulary, spelling, grammar, cohesive ties) and extra-linguistic features (punctuation, capitalization, formatting) appropriate for their text’s content, genre, and target audience. (p. 75)
Ethnography of Writing as a Framework to Introduce Academic Writing
As I mainly tutor and teach academic writing to freshmen ESL first-year university students, I am well acquainted with their writing challenges based on my teaching experience and research study. Current research study has also found that ESL undergraduate students faced many challenges with academic writing in the U.S. university context.
To illustrate, Chauhan (2021) concluded that ESL “undergraduate students experienced academic writing challenges [including] content (gathering information/ideas), organization, academic vocabulary, genre awareness, grammar and mechanics, and citing and referencing sources” (p. 148) because the standards and genre-specific expectations of AW in English are different from those of in ESL students’ L1s (Ferris, 2018; Giltrow et al., 2014; Osmond, 2016; Starkey, 2015).
To address the AW challenges of my ESL first-year university students, I employ Grabe and Kaplan’s (1996) ethnography of writing, which provides a theoretical framework to understand AW regarding its social and cultural contexts in U.S. higher education. Before creating any written text, all writers must ask this fundamental question: “who writes what to whom, for what purpose, why, when, where, and how?” (Cooper, 1979, as cited in Grabe & Kaplan, 1996, p. 203). They further stated that this framework considers academic writing as a combination of writer, reader, subject matter, and text as a writing triangle in which the writer persuades the readers in terms of logos (reason/text), pathos (values, beliefs/audience), and ethos (credibility/writer). Overall, the ethnography of writing is one of the best frameworks to introduce AW to the freshmen ESL students because this framework examines the text’s audience, the writer’s purpose, the genre required by the task, and the situation in which the wiring is used (Grabe & Kaplan, 1996).
Taxonomies of Ethnography of Writing
Grabe and Kaplan (1996) introduced eight types of taxonomies of ethnography of writing to discuss further how this framework operates in a broader academic context. Their framework is further explained together with how I employed this framework to teach writing to my ESL first-year students in a Midwestern U.S. university.
Who
Grabe and Kaplan (1996) state that the first parameter of ethnography of writing is a taxonomy of who, i.e., writers. Knowing the writer and their background is critical to understanding writing well. It is essential to understand whether the individual is a beginning writer or a mature writer and whether the writer is a student who will be evaluated by their teachers or an independent scholarly writer who writes for an academic journal. This background information of the writer influences the audience for whom the writing is produced.
Considering this parameter, I often emphasize the writer’s role in my writing class. As an L2 writing instructor, I know that my students come from different first language (L1) backgrounds. The writing system in their L1s works differently from the writing system in English. I am aware that they are beginner writers in L2 and need more explicit instruction, support, and encouragement from me. I do understand that they are at the initial phase of creating their identity in L2 writing. In the meantime, I am also aware that their authorial voice is critical. So, I orient my students to use academic language and concrete words that embody meaning in the academic context (Bailey, 2018; Brun-Mercer & Zimmerman, 2015; Johnson, 2016), which ultimately helps the writers to make their voices strong. Also, I ask my students to use active structures to strengthen their authorial voice.
Writes
The second taxonomy of ethnography of writing is writes, which focuses on the linguistic nature of writing. This taxonomy of ethnography considers the entire process of text construction, its different linguistic parts, and their organization (thesis statement, topic statements, coherence, cohesion, word choice, reference, transition words (Grabe & Kaplan, 1996), sequencing information (Atkinson, 1991), and overall rhetorical arrangement of information (Bruthiaux, 1993). Overall, in the process of text construction, the writer considers audience, purpose, context, and the genre requirement (Grabe & Kaplan, 1996), discipline-specificity, and disciplinarity (Christiene & Maton, 2011; Flowerdew & Costley, 2016). There are two approaches that I use to teach writing: a process-based approach and a genre-based approach.
First, I follow a process-based approach (White & Arndt, 1991; Zamel,1983) to teach writing in my class. For example, selecting topics (they select topics themselves which they are passionate about writing), gathering required information, creating an outline, preparing the first draft, seeking feedback from peers, writing center tutors, and teachers, addressing feedback, editing, and finally submitting the final draft to the instructor for evaluation (Johnson, 2016; White & Arndt, 1991). Each step in this writing process is equally important for them because my students need to undergo various stages of the writing process to write essays. Also, they will receive points for an outline, first draft, and final draft separately.
Another approach that I employ to teach writing to my students in my class is the genre-based approach (Hyland, 2004; Swales, 1990; Tardy, 2008) because genre-based instruction enhances L2 students’ knowledge in four main areas, which include “formal knowledge of target genres’ features and conventions, the process knowledge of the methods used to produce, distribute, and consume these genres, rhetorical knowledge of target genres’ functions, characteristics, strategies, and subject matter knowledge of disciplinary content and skills” (Tardy, 2009, p. 21). By recognising the usefulness of a genre-based approach to writing, past research studies emphasized the responsibility of L2 educators to develop L2 students’ genre knowledge (Ferris & Hedgcock, 2013; Hyland, 2004; Tardy, 2008, 2009). Highlighting the importance of genre, Hyland (2004) stated “to fail to provide learners with what we know about how language works… denies them the means of both communicating effectively in writing and analyzing text critically” (p. 42). As the L2 students are not much acquainted with different types of genres, it is imperative to teach them genre knowledge explicitly. Also, they need to know that written texts are specific to each academic discipline, program, and major (Christie & Maton, 2011; Hyland, 2017).
Therefore, I provide a sample essay to my students, and they are engaged to analyze and identify all parts of the essay. They include an introduction (hook, background information, and thesis statement), three body paragraphs beginning with topic sentences, supporting details (explanations, reasons, examples, data, experiences, observations, etc.), and a conclusion that summarizes the main points of the essay and restates the thesis statement. In doing so, my students internalize all parts of the essay, which will help them to create their essays later. Ferris and Hedgcock (2013) and Tardy (2008) also stress that it is crucial to train beginner writers with skills that enable them to participate in intertextual systems.
What
The third taxonomy of ethnography of writing is what, i.e., the content or message. Grabe and Kaplan (1996) emphasize that this writing parameter should be described in terms of content, genre, and register. So, this taxonomy of writing seeks to answer these questions: to what extent does the writer need to have background knowledge (content) to create a particular text, what type of texts does the writer produce, and in which fields they are used? The what aspect of writing “must take into account the phenomenological world (a theory of world knowledge), a theory of genre, and some specification of register” (Grabe & Kaplan, 1996, p. 205). In other words, the writer’s background knowledge (schema theory) is crucial in this taxonomy of writing because it provides the writer with the knowledge of the genre and the techniques to organize academic discourse for a specific purpose (Grabe & Kaplan, 1996; Swales, 1990). So, it is critical for ESL writing instructors to allow their students to choose their topics to write.
In my writing class, I do not assign any essay topics to my students. Instead, I provide them with the freedom to choose their topics themselves because I want to promote social justice in my writing class. I also encourage them to choose a topic based on their background knowledge because it is difficult for them to write on a topic that is entirely new to them. For example, the student majoring in Finance ended up choosing a topic from their field, such as Three Ways to Make Money Legally in the U.S. However, the student who is specializing in Sports Management wrote Three Strategies to Improve Cricket. Unlike these two students, the next student who is majoring in Nursing decided to write on Three Benefits of Homemade Breakfast. Besides that, I also provide them with a sample essay to follow because I follow a genre-based approach to teaching writing. This approach allows them to be acquainted with the framework of a text used in the academic context. In doing so, they can write their essays on their topics by following sample essays given to them.
To Whom
Another powerful taxonomy of writing is to whom, which refers to the audience. Grabe and Kaplan (1996) call it a theory of audience or readers because the audience is always at the center of creating a text. Also, the audience plays an essential role in the meaning-making of the text. The writer needs to ponder some of these questions regarding the audience. Are the readers known or unknown to the writer? If they are known, how close or distant are they? How much-shared knowledge exists between the readers and the writer in general? How much-shared knowledge exists between them on a particular topic. Grabe and Kaplan (1996) further state that the audience’s parameter influences the writer’s writing, including the number of persons who are expected to read the text, the extent to which the readers are known or unknown to the writer, the level of status (can be either higher, equal, or lower) between them, the extent of shared background knowledge between readers, and the extent of specific topical shared knowledge between readers and writers.
Building on Grabe and Kaplan’s (1996) framework, recent research studies also highlighted the role of the audience. Before the author writes any text, they need to consider their audience because the type of audience determines their writing (Swales & Feak, 2012). Similarly, Kirszner and Mandell (2015) argued that while writing any text, the audience should be kept in mind because they determine the purpose of the paper. While writing, academic writers envision a specific audience who share knowledge regarding a topic or issue they are writing about (Grabe & Kaplan, 1996; Singh & Lukkarila, 2017). Realizing the significance of to whom parameter, I often ask my students to decide their audience because it is critical for them to know who is going to read their essays. They know that two types of audience read their essays. They include their classmates and their instructor/s.
For What Purpose
As its name suggests, this taxonomy refers to the purpose of producing a text. Grabe and Kaplan (1996) state that every written text is created purposefully. They add that when the writer thinks of purpose, they need to ask these questions: to what extent is it possible to define purpose in a writing task? Are there single or multiple purposes in the task? How does purpose interact with genre and audience? As most writings are meant for audiences, they expect the purpose of the paper when they read them. Therefore, most writers mention their goal of writing to facilitate the readers to make better meaning of the text.
Before writing anything, the writer should be clear about the purpose of writing. Kirszner and Mandell (2015) argued that it is the purpose that limits the writer what to say and how to say it. According to Bailey (2015, 2018), there are three main reasons for writing: (i) to argue on a subject of common interest and give the writer’s view, (ii) to report on a piece of research study and create some type of new knowledge, and (iii) to synthesize research conducted by others on a topic. So, AW is unique because the writer shares inquiry-based knowledge to inform a particular academic community (Singh & Lukkarila, 2017). Considering this taxonomy, all writers need to know the purpose of the academic texts they are writing.
In keeping in mind this taxonomy, I mention to my students that each piece of writing has a certain purpose. My students mostly write five types of essays, and these are five-paragraph essays. For example, when they write a cause-and-effect essay, they show cause and effect relationship of a particular topic. However, when they write a descriptive essay, the purpose is to describe a place, person, object/thing, and process. Unlike these two essays, when my students write classification essays, the objective is to describe three main categories of a particular topic in an interesting way. For example, one of my students chose to write on Three Types of Roommates, whereas another student was interested to write on Three Types of Cell Phone Users.
Why
According to Grabe and Kaplan (1996), the notion of why people write refers to underlying intentions or motives that may or may not be revealed by functional purpose. However, if the writer’s motive is apparent, it helps the readers comprehend the text better. Therefore, genre-based texts overtly express the writer’s motive to facilitate schema instantiation. So, the why component of writing depends on the paper’s audience, topic, and purpose.
In order to make sure my students maintain the why component in their writing, I encourage them to engage in peer review. When they participate in the peer review process in different phases of their writing, they are provided with opportunities to read their course mates essays. In doing so, they not only write on only their topics but also get an opportunity to read and offer feedback on their classmates’ essays. First, they are provided with a checklist (based on a rubric) and asked to give feedback focusing on higher-order concerns such as content/ideas, organization, and vocabulary because they play an important role to convey the writers’ message to their readers. Then, they also give their feedback concentrating on lower-order concerns such as grammar, mechanics, and formatting.
When and Where
According to Grabe and Kaplan (1996), this parameter refers to text creation’s time and place. This taxonomy of writing plays a more minor role than the rest of the taxonomies. However, its relevance depends on the type of text. For example, in official emails and letters, the date and place they are sent may be more critical for both the writer and receiver (reader).
In my writing class, when the parameter is crucial for my students because every writing assignment has a fixed deadline to complete and submit to me. The deadline is clearly mentioned in my writing course which every student is provided with both printed and digital copies of the course syllabus on the first day of the class each semester. Also, the deadline for each writing assignment is also mentioned on D2L (an online learning platform used in most U.S. universities and colleges). My students strictly follow the deadline to submit each writing assignment. If students are unable to submit their writing assignments due to any unexpected circumstances, they inform me via email and request an extension of the deadline. In that case, I extend the deadline depending on each student’s situation. In that case, I also provide additional time for individual conferencing with that student to support their writing development.
How
Although this is the final parameter of the writing’s ethnography, this is probably the most important because it examines how the text is created. Therefore, this parameter is also called “a theory of online writing production … or a theory of writing process” (Grabe & Kaplan, 1996, p. 213). Mainly, there are two things this parameter emphasizes. First, writing is a recursive process because the writing process stages, namely planning, drafting, revising, editing, and sharing, do not come in a neat linear sequence. Instead, the writers move backwards and forward several times to create a text (Hyland, 2003; Zamel, 1983). Next, the cognitive mechanism remains at the center of this parameter because it “provides [the writers with] the means for exploring notions such as audience, content, and writer intension from a composing perspective” (Grabe & Kaplan, 1996, p. 213).
This parameter is crucial for my students. For each writing assignment, they must go through all writing stages. They also know each stage has its significance in terms of learning and assessment. For example, they are aware that they cannot create a good outline without gathering sufficient information on a topic. Similarly, no good first draft can be written without a good outline. Without seeking and addressing feedback on the first draft, the final draft does not turn out to be perfect. My students understand this process; therefore, they love to follow all phases of the writing process because they receive separate points for outlines, first drafts, and final drafts.
Conclusion
To sum up, I have found that Grabe and Kaplan’s (1996) ethnography of writing is a useful framework to introduce AW to my ESL first-year university students. My students have developed an understanding of the basics of AW after I employed this approach. This framework has been very effective for me for two reasons. First, this framework promotes the teaching and learning of AW by asking the ESL students to analyze the writer’s process before composing any written text. As Paltridge (2017) stated, the students are asked: “to undertake any analysis of the context in which the text they are writing occurs and consider how the situation in which they are writing impacts upon what they write and how they write it” (p. 12). Second, this approach considers the intended audience, their background knowledge, values and understanding, conventions, genre awareness, and discipline-specificity and disciplinarity (Christie & Maton, 2011; Paltridge, 2017) because of people working in the academic community share “ideas, beliefs, values, goals, practices, conventions, and ways of creating and distributing knowledge” (Flowerdew & Costley, 2016, p. 11). Therefore, the ESL writing instructor’s responsibility is to train first-year university students to familiarize themselves with these elements when writing for academic purposes.
References
Atkinson, D. (1991). Discourse analysis and written discourse conventions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,11, 57-76. doi: 10.1017/S0267190500001951
Bailey, S. (2015). The essentials of academic writing for international students (4th ed.). Routledge.
Bailey, S. (2018). The essentials of academic writing for international students (5th ed.). Routledge.
Bruthiaux, P. (1993). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. Oxford University Press.
Chauhan, P. B. (2021). Academic writing challenges experienced by international students in a Midwest U.S. university: A phenomenological inquiry [Doctoral dissertation, Minnesota State University, Mankato]. Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/etds/1129
Christie, F., & Maton, K. (2011). Disciplinarity functional linguistic and sociological perspectives. Continuum International.
Duff, P.A., & Anderson, T. (2015). Academic language and literacy socialization for second-language students. In N. Markee (Ed.), Handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp.337-352). Wiley-Blackwell.
Ferris, D. (2018). Writing in second language. In J.M. Newton, D.R. Ferris, C. C. M. Goh, W. Grabe, F. L. Stoller, & L. Vandergriff (Eds.), Teaching English to second language learners in academic context: Reading, writing, listening, and speaking (pp.75-122). Routledge.
Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. (2013). Teaching L2 composition: purpose, process, and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Flowerdew, J., & Costley, T. (2016). Introduction. In J. Flowerdew, J. & T. Costley (Eds.), Discipline-specific writing (pp. 9-40). Routledge.
Giltrow, J., Gooding, R., Burgoyne, D., & Sawatsky, M. (2014). Academic writing: An introduction (3rd ed.). Broadview Press.
Gottlieb, M., & Ernst-Slavit, G. (2013). Academic language: A centerpiece for academic success in English language arts. In M. Gottlieb & G. Ernst-Slavit, Eds.), Academic language in diverse classrooms (pp. 1-38). Corwin.
Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R.B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. Longman.
Greene, S., & Lidinsky, A. (2015). From inquiry to academic writing. A practical guide. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, K. (2017). Learning to write for academic purposes: Specificity and second language writing. In J. Bitchener, N. Storch, & R. Wette (Eds.), Teaching writing for academic purposes to multilingual students: Instructional approaches (pp. 24-41). Routledge.
Johnson, A. (2016). Academic writing: Process and product. Rowman & Littlefield.
Kirszner, L.G. & Mandell, S. R. (2015). Patterns for college writing: A rhetorical reader and guide. Bedford St. Martins.
Odena, O., & Burgess, H. (2017). How doctoral students and graduates describe facilitating experiences and strategies for their thesis writing learning process: A qualitative approach. Studies in Higher Education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 42(3), 572–590. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1063598
Osmond, A. (2016). Academic writing and grammar for students (2nd ed.). Sage.
Paltridge, B. (2017). Context and the teaching of academic writing. In J. Bitchener, N. Storch, & R. Wette (Eds.), Teaching writing for academic purposes to multilingual students: Instructional approaches (pp. 9-23). Routledge.
Singh, A.A., & Lukkarila, L. (2017). Successful academic writing: A complete guide for social and behavioral scientists. The Guilford Press.
Starkey, D. (2015). Academic writing now: A brief guide for busy students. Broadview Press.
Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J.M., & Feak, C.B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (3rd ed.). University of Michigan Press.
Tardy, C. M. (2008). Multimodality and the teaching of advanced academic writing: A genre systems perspective on speaking-writing connections. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral-literate connection: Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp. 191-208). University of Michigan Press.
Tardy, C. M. (2009). Building genre knowledge. Parlor Press.
White, R. & Arndt, V. (1991). Process writing (1st ed.). Longman.
Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly,17(2), 165-187. doi:10.2307/3586647
Author’s Bio: Dr Padam Chauhan works as a Retention Specialist for the International Center and an ESL Instructor for the IEP at Minnesota State University (MNSU), Mankato, Minnesota, USA. Prior to that, Padam worked as a Writing Consultant for MNSU’s Writing Center. He has earned MEd in English Education from T.U., Nepal, MA in TESOL, and EdD from MNSU, Mankato. Before joining MNSU, Mankato, he taught ESL at the high school level and served as a high school (10+2) principal in Nepal. Padam voluntarily served NELTA Central Committee as its member, treasurer, and general secretary. Padam has presented at the NELTA, IATEFL, TESOL, AAAL, and TESL conferences in Nepal, the UK, the USA, and Canada. His current research interests include academic reading and writing, Writing Center tutoring pedagogy, and equitable access to English language education.
This review is based on the interview which was published in April 2018 issue of ELTChoutari. Ashok Raj Khati, one of the editors of https://eltchoutari.com/ has explored significant ideas on academic writing from the interaction with scholars working in different universities of Nepal. The structured interview is centred on the university programmes which provide students with opportunities for learning skills of academic writing. It also highlights research and writing culture in the universities and publication habit of academics in their profession. The interview also raises the issue of plagiarism in Nepali academia.
The majority of academics in this interview emphasise that the formal courses they have in their universities can develop students’ academic writing skills. However, Khadka, Chairperson of English Subject Committee at Mid-Western University, Nepal, values the ELT club of students, which is a community of learning, to develop their writing skills. Students’ participation and presentation of their writing in seminars and conferences are highly focused by Gnawali and Ojha. Teachers’ feedback on students’ writing is focused to improve writing skills. However, developing students’ academic writing skills is a challenging job of university teachers in Nepali universities where the majority of students enrolled in English education come from government high schools. The students learn the English language in their schools as a subject among other subjects. Nevertheless, Negi doubts the scholarly qualification of university teachers and their learning and teaching habits who lack broad academic knowledge and extensively use diary notes to deliver lectures instead of teaching skills. Gaulee criticises university teachers for not providing feedback on students’ writing. He suggests the teachers need to value their salary for teaching life skills for students but not just for grading their level.
The academics in the interview highlight plagiarism in the works of academics and postgraduate students as a serious concern and a major issue in academic discussions in universities. Gnawali presumes that scholars plagiarise in their scholarly writing generally for two reasons: an intention to get quick promotion and lack of knowledge about how to acknowledge the sources. And the lack of enforcement of the law against the academic crime seems to be a loophole to allow the growth of plagiarism. Negi suggests the use of software to prevent plagiarism and discourage such activities in the authorship of academic publications. I believe that the academics’ arguments, ideas and suggestions signpost the demand for reformation in Nepali university programmes, the need for international standard academic writing and the development of research culture and publication.
The issues raised in the interview and the suggestions made to improve academic writings and publications in Nepal are genuine and significant if academics realise these in their professional activities. I reiterate the ideas of Gnawali and Gaulee that the honesty in knowledge and fair in sharing ideas in all kinds of academic publications should come first before thinking about earning money. However, the academic practice in Nepali universities is still based on Gurukul tradition, where chela (learners) just follow what their Guru (teacher) says. This culture is well maintained in academic writing and publications too. University lecturers and even professors compile contents from several sources based on the syllabus to prepare a book, author the book and insist undergraduate and postgraduate students to purchase their publications. None of such publications is ethical as the authors copy and paste contents without acknowledging the sources. Such publications are not standard because the information gathered in them is neither genuine nor authentic.
So far I know that the majority of standard journal articles and books in international academia are voluntarily written, reviewed and published, although few publishers charge little amount of money to cover the cost of press and distribution. Academics in Nepal need to learn about it and transform themselves before thinking to bring change in academic activities. Except rare recent graduates from local and international universities, who have been working hard to transform piracy academic culture to research-based original publication system in Nepali academia, the majority of university academics need to learn tangible academic skills and reflect their both soft and hard academic skills. Soft skills refer to social skills such as honesty in acknowledgement, fairness in information and unbiased criticality and hard skills refer to writing skills such as selection of academic language, organisation of ideas and presentation of information in an article or a book chapter.
Dr. Rana is associated with School of Teacher Education, College of Education, Health and Human Development, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Twenty-four years ago, on a fine morning, my maternal grandfather was having a conversation with one of his friends. He said, “My grandson wrote a letter in English and sent to his uncle in Okhaldhunga“. His friend replied, “It’s amazing. He has done a great job!” My grandfather felt proud of what his grandson (me) had achieved by writing a letter. This was my first piece of creative writing. The others I wrote were what I memorised. I also felt that I had achieved a great feat. I had gone through a book of local writer and followed the pattern of writing a personal letter. I have taught the English language in a community campus affiliated with Tribhuvan University for a decade. I am currently doing MPhil in English language education at Tribhuvan University. In this blog piece, I focus on how I got acquainted with academic writing during the first five months of the MPhil program.
I used to consider that the creative and academic writings are the same. Now I learned that academic writing is different from the creative ones. Academic writing is an activity of academics which requires a standard language. I got an opportunity to read what Greene and Lidinsky (2012) said: “Academic writing is what scholars do to communicate with other scholars in their fields of study, their disciplines (p.1)”. They further added that academic writers or scholars use specialised language to capture the complexity of an issue or to introduce specific ideas from their discipline. I learned that academic writing includes serious thoughts, complex sentences, specialised vocabulary, and variety in construction. Academic writing is thus authentic, objective, unambiguous, systematic and purposeful.
I have experiences of teaching, supervising masters theses and carrying out small-scale researches. I have also published a few journal articles in local journals. However, as a student of MPhil, I felt I have not been much familiar with academic writing. One day our teachers in ‘Advanced Qualitative Research’ asked us a question: “Have you ever written a daily journal in your academic career?” We did not have the answer as many of us do not have the practice of writing even a page every day. They suggested us that novice academics should write a reflective summary of an article or any readings we have gone through on that day. Listening to them what I felt that I had not done what I am supposed to do to be an academic.
After two months, our teachers gave us some assignments to do. The teachers instructed us to write an introductory part of a research-based article on any topic. I was assigned to write a report on a selected topic choosing a research paradigm, an academic article and an experience on the influential professional issue. I found myself comfortable with the first two than writing an experience.
Regarding selecting the research issue and the problem, I had to strive a lot in the beginning. I was instructed to find an important issue, mostly in language education in Nepal in which I am interested in. I was able to choose an issue after going through several books, articles and interaction with teachers. I selected the issue and wrote a concept note on it and submitted to my professors. Then they advised us to link it with a theory, theoretical grounding of the issue. This was the most difficult part for me. I took support from my teachers and I went through many research articles and books. I wrote the theoretical framework of my issues as the second step for my assignment.
In the next step, they told us to collect data selecting appropriate research methodology. I have to mention the details of the methodology part. They made us practice developing themes from the transcription of our data. Finally, as the third assignment, they asked us to prepare a complete research-based article on the issue that we have selected as the first assignment. Doing a lot of practice, visiting different websites, studying research-based journal articles and taking help from teachers I completed my final assignment.
Reflection
The narrative that I mentioned above asserts to me that I am really satisfied with five months of my MPhil class. First of all, I took initiation to write a reflection on different issues that I am interested in and summary of the text that I studied. I learnt to choose the research issues and problems from the practical life for carrying out research. I learned to develop a theoretical framework on an issue of the research. Similarly, I got ideas to collect data using audiovisual devices, transcribe the recorded data in the paper following the rules and criteria of transcription, develop themes from the transcription, analyse and interpret the themes with the voices of my research participants and related literature. In a nutshell, I received a lot of ideas to write a research-based article in the first semester. I believe, it is an example of learning to create an academic writing.
At this point,
I started the journey of my creative writing by composing a personal letter when I was studying in Grade Ten. I have been a teacher in schools and colleges for several years. However, the MPhil program taught me to create an academic article. With this five-month experience, I felt that creating an academic article is different from writing in other forms as it has distinct features to be considered.
Reference
Green, S. & Lidinsky, A. (2012). From Inquiry to Academic Writing: A Text Book and Reader. New york: Bedford/ St. Martin’s.
Mr. Ghimire teaches at Siddhajyoti Education Campus in Sindhuli. He is currently pursuing MPhil in English language education from Graduate School of Education, Tribhuvan University.
We are delighted to present the second quarterly issue (April- June) of ELT Choutari of 2018. Standing at this point and looking back, we have been able to publish 87 issues in the past 10 years, and we believe that it has been a good source of learning and a place for expressing feelings, ideas and professional experiences. This has really encouraged us to keep the ball rolling.
Why skill for doing a job? Whatever we attempt to do, it requires particular skills to accomplish the task successfully. For example, the way of dressing up for a party, driving a car, decorating a room, painting a picture, performing a dance, designing a building, speaking in a conference, writing an essay or doing so and so activities are skills. In a generic sense, skill is an ability to perform an activity systematically. Whether preparing a cup of coffee or writing a thesis for a degree, skills specific to the jobs label the quality and taste of both of them. I believe that a customer enjoys the taste of coffee in a cup but not the cup in a cafeteria. Therefore, the owner of the cafeteria employs professional barista to attract maximum customers and increase the sales. However, customers always talk about the taste of coffee but not the barista who prepares a nice cup of coffee for the customers. Does it make a difference to the barista’s job and skill? Sometimes it does but mostly not.
An academic writer perhaps needs to understand this fact. Although it is not easy to develop academic writing skills, the skills play a vital role to offer a nice piece of writing to readers. It does not matter whoever you are like a barista in a cafeteria kitchen but the taste matters- the taste of your writing matters! I have heard several gossips among teachers and academics that they would like to be an academic writer but I have never heard how they would become a writer. How many postgraduate students internalise the role of a barista? I believe that a barista must have spent a long life preparing the coffee to become a professional barista. S/he might have learned the skills from several mistakes and losses.
This issue offers reading various experiences of several academics who share their struggles, challenges they faced, skills they learned and some degree of academic knowledge. These articles focus on skills of writing an academic paper and suggest that academics learn academic skills from their writing activities similar to a barista who learns skills of preparing coffee from the workplace. I believe that teachers, students and emergent researchers will be benefited reading these writings about “writings”.
In the first post, Thesis Writing: A Hard Nut to Crack, Muna Rai shares her anxiety, process and pain, and pleasure of writing her Master’s thesis.
In the similar second post, Sharing My Experiences of Master’s Thesis Writing, Mamata Bhattarai shares her reflective journey of thesis writing.
Likewise, in our third post, A Teacher’s Journal of Teaching Writing in Community School of Nepal, Bimal Khanal shares his experiences and feeling of teaching writing in the community school and perceptions of students.
Similarly, introducing our one of the popular genres “the interactive blog post”, Ashok Raj Khati weaves the policies, practices, processes and challenges in teaching writing in English Language Education (ELE) Program in Nepali Universities with the collaboration of the faculties of different universities in Nepal.
In the same way, in an exclusive interview with the expert from our thematic area of this issue, Dr Shyam Sharma focuses on the beliefs and assumptions about writing, need of writing today, issues and challenges in our writing education, and some ways forward.
In another post, Thinh Le shares tips for composing an essay and taking academic notes effectively based on his experience.
Finally, in the last post, our Choutari editor, Jeevan Karki presents you the seven special photos from different areas that can be used in teaching language skills especially writing.
I would like to thank my dear friends: Jeevan Karki, Ashok Raj Khati and Praveen Kumar Yadav, the editors of https://eltchoutari.com/ for their support to bring this issue. To be honest, they have done much more than me on this issue and have ever put their greater effort to make this professional online magazine sustainable. The founders of this online magazine always deserve the core place of bigger thank you.
Finally, if you enjoy reading any post, please feel free to share in your circle and of course, drop your comments in the boxes below that will encourage us to keep moving. Similarly, you can send your reflective experiences, journals, best practices, book reviews, case studies, local and global perspectives on ELT, etc. You can email us your post at 2elt.choutari@gmail.com
